IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jeczfn/v112y2014i2p115-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New technology adoption in a Cournot oligopoly with spillovers

Author

Listed:
  • Yanfang Zhang
  • Shue Mei
  • Weijun Zhong

Abstract

In a two-stage Cournot oligopoly where a subset of firms first make a choice between two alternative production technologies independently and then all firms compete in quantity, the effect of information spillovers is analyzed when the outcome of R&D is uncertain. It is shown that the range of parameter values that support heterogeneous firms in equilibrium will diminish as information spillovers become larger. Particularly, when the spillover effect is so strong that the investment by one firm is beneficial to its R&D active rivals, all active firms will choose the same technology. A similar result can be derived from a socially desirable point of view except that the cut-off magnitude of spillovers is different. By introducing a positive success probability to characterize the uncertainty of the R&D outcome, it is found that when information spillovers are not too small, there will be underinvestment in equilibrium relative to the social optimum. Copyright Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Yanfang Zhang & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2014. "New technology adoption in a Cournot oligopoly with spillovers," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 115-136, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jeczfn:v:112:y:2014:i:2:p:115-136
    DOI: 10.1007/s00712-013-0353-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00712-013-0353-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00712-013-0353-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jensen, Richard, 1992. "Innovation Adoption and Welfare under Uncertainty," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 173-180, June.
    2. Zhao, Jingang, 2001. "A characterization for the negative welfare effects of cost reduction in Cournot oligopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 455-469, March.
    3. Qiu, Larry D., 1997. "On the Dynamic Efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot Equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 213-229, July.
    4. Mills, David E. & Smith, William, 1996. "It pays to be different: Endogenous heterogeneity of firms in an oligopoly," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 317-329, May.
    5. Jeroen Hinloopen & Jan Vandekerckhove, 2009. "Dynamic efficiency of Cournot and Bertrand competition: input versus output spillovers," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 98(2), pages 119-136, November.
    6. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    7. Jeroen Hinloopen, 2000. "More on subsidizing cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 295-308, October.
    8. De Bondt, Raymond & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 1991. "Strategic investment with spillovers," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 345-366, October.
    9. Michael L. Katz, 1986. "An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(4), pages 527-543, Winter.
    10. Elberfeld, Walter, 2003. "A note on technology choice, firm heterogeneity and welfare," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 593-605, April.
    11. Hauenschild, Nils, 2003. "On the role of input and output spillovers when R&D projects are risky," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 1065-1089, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hattori, Masahiko & Tanaka, Yasuhito, 2016. "License or entry in oligopoly," MPRA Paper 73547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2016. "Subsidizing New Technology Adoption in a Stackelberg Duopoly: Cases of Substitutes and Complements," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 2(2), pages 197-215, July.
    3. X. Henry Wang & Chenhang Zeng, 2014. "A Note on Endogenous Heterogeneity in a Duopoly," SDU Working Papers 2015-02, School of Economics, Shandong University.
    4. Yanfang Zhang & Qianwen Tan & Yuchang Ji, 2023. "Input subsidy versus output subsidy for green R&D in a supply chain," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 97-126, January.
    5. Xing Gao & Ying Wang, 2023. "Competitive analysis of R&D investment with R&D budget constraint and R&D uncertainty," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2438-2456, June.
    6. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2017. "Competitiveness of Firm Behavior and Public Policy for New Technology Adoption in an Oligopoly," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 135-151, June.
    7. Yanfang Zhang & Weijun Zhong, 2015. "Are Public Firms Always Less Innovative than Private Firms?," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 66(3), pages 393-407, September.
    8. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2017. "Competitiveness and Subsidy or Tax Policy for New Technology Adoption in Duopoly," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 18-32, January.
    9. Zhang, Yanfang, 2019. "To enter or not to enter? A competitive analysis with minimum quality standards," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 508-527.
    10. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2016. "License or entry with vertical differentiation in duopoly," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 17-29.
    11. John C. Strandholm, 2020. "Promotion of Green Technology under Different Environmental Policies," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Yanfang Zhang & Yuchang Ji & Qianwen Tan, 2023. "Endogenous spillovers in a non‐tournament R&D duopoly under uncertainty," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 208-214, January.
    13. Xing Gao & Xifan Wang & Weijun Zhong & Ying Wang, 2023. "R&D subsidy and output subsidy in a duopoly: The role of technology spillover and R&D budget," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 524-538, September.
    14. Zhang, Yanfang, 2020. "When should firms choose a risky new technology? An oligopolistic analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 687-693.
    15. Carroni, Elias & Delogu, Marco & Pulina, Giuseppe, 2023. "Technology adoption and specialized labor," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 249-259.
    16. Masahiko Hattori & Yasuhito Tanaka, 2015. "Subsidy or tax policy for new technology adoption in duopoly with quadratic and linear cost functions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(2), pages 1423-1433.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie‐Laure Cabon‐Dhersin & Romain Gibert, 2020. "R&D cooperation, proximity and distribution of public funding between public and private research sectors," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(6), pages 773-800, December.
    2. Raymond De Bondt & Jan Vandekerckhove, 2012. "Reflections on the Relation Between Competition and Innovation," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 7-19, March.
    3. Karbowski Adam, 2016. "The Elasticity-Based Approach to Enterprise Innovation," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 49(1), pages 58-78, March.
    4. Hinloopen, Jeroen, 2000. "Strategic R&D Co-operatives," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 153-185, June.
    5. Rabah Amir & Filomena Garcia & Christine Halmenschlager & Joana Pais, 2011. "R&D As A Prisoner'S Dilemma And R&D‐Avoiding Cartels," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 79(1), pages 81-99, January.
    6. Adam Karbowski & Jacek Prokop, 2018. "R&D activities of enterprises, product market leadership, and collusion," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(2), pages 735-753.
    7. Jacek, Prokop & Adam, Karbowski, 2016. "Pozioma współpraca badawczo-rozwojowa a kartelizacja gałęzi [Horizontal R&D cooperation and market cartelization]," MPRA Paper 73605, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Zhang, Yanfang, 2020. "When should firms choose a risky new technology? An oligopolistic analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 687-693.
    9. Dirk Czarnitzki & Bernd Ebersberger & Andreas Fier, 2007. "The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(7), pages 1347-1366.
    10. Kaiser, Ulrich, 2002. "An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 747-774, June.
    11. Amir, Rabah, 2000. "Modelling imperfectly appropriable R&D via spillovers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(7), pages 1013-1032, October.
    12. Burr, Chrystie & Knauff, Malgorzata & Stepanova, Anna, 2013. "On the prisoner’s dilemma in R&D with input spillovers and incentives for R&D cooperation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 254-261.
    13. Paul Belleflamme & Valeria Forlin, 2020. "Endogenous vertical segmentation in a Cournot oligopoly," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 181-195, October.
    14. Jacco Thijssen & Kuno Huisman & Peter Kort, 2006. "The effects of information on strategic investment and welfare," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 28(2), pages 399-424, June.
    15. Peter-J. Jost, 2021. "Endogenous formation of entrepreneurial networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 39-64, January.
    16. Jiaqi Chen & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2023. "Cournot–Bertrand comparisons under R&D competition: Output versus R&D subsidies," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 19(1), pages 77-100, March.
    17. Yannis Caloghirou & Stavros Ioannides & Nicholas S. Vonortas, 2003. "Research Joint Ventures," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(4), pages 541-570, September.
    18. E. Bacchiega & P. G. Garella, 2018. "Niche vs. central firms: Technology choice and cost-price dynamics in a differentiated oligopoly," Working Papers wp1126, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    19. STUART McDONALD & JOANNA POYAGO-THEOTOKY, 2017. "Green Technology and Optimal Emissions Taxation," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 19(2), pages 362-376, April.
    20. Marco Orecchia, 1994. "Scelte cooperative in attività di ricerca e sviluppo," CERIS Working Paper 199402, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cournot oligopoly; Uncertainty; Technology choice ; Spillovers; D21; D43; L13; O31;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jeczfn:v:112:y:2014:i:2:p:115-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.