IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v199y2025i3d10.1007_s10551-024-05883-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judging in the Dark: How Delivery Riders Form Fairness Perceptions Under Algorithmic Management

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Xiang

    (Wuhan University)

  • Jing Du

    (Wuhan University)

  • Xue Ni Zheng

    (Wuhan University)

  • Li Rong Long

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Huan Yan Xie

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

The application of algorithms in organizations is becoming more widespread. Previous research has aimed to enhance employees’ perceptions of algorithmic fairness by focusing on technical features. However, individuals often struggle to observe and comprehend these features, hindering their ability to form rational fairness judgments. Drawing upon fairness heuristic theory, this study explores how individuals perceive algorithmic fairness when technical features are invisible because of algorithmic opacity. Research conducted with food delivery riders in China suggests that, in the absence of transparent algorithmic information, riders heuristically form perceptions of algorithmic fairness based on more salient and accessible distributive fairness information. These heuristic perceptions of algorithmic fairness further predict outcomes such as task performance and helping behavior. We also found that different distributive fairness information holds varying importance in the process of shaping heuristic perceptions of algorithmic fairness and that algorithmic transparency perceptions and tenure moderate this process. The findings extend fairness heuristic theory and have practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Xiang & Jing Du & Xue Ni Zheng & Li Rong Long & Huan Yan Xie, 2025. "Judging in the Dark: How Delivery Riders Form Fairness Perceptions Under Algorithmic Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 199(3), pages 653-670, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:199:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05883-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05883-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05883-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05883-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    2. Romain Cadario & Chiara Longoni & Carey K. Morewedge, 2021. "Understanding, explaining, and utilizing medical artificial intelligence," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1636-1642, December.
    3. Marion Fortin & I Cojuharenco & D Patient & H German, 2016. "It is time for justice: How time changes what we know about justice judgments and justice effects," Post-Print halshs-01520971, HAL.
    4. Christian Fieseler & Eliane Bucher & Christian Pieter Hoffmann, 2019. "Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 987-1005, June.
    5. Shin, Donghee & Zhong, Bu & Biocca, Frank A., 2020. "Beyond user experience: What constitutes algorithmic experiences?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trautwein, Yannik & Zechiel, Felix & Coussement, Kristof & Meire, Matthijs & Büttgen, Marion, 2025. "Opening the ‘black box’ of HRM algorithmic biases – How hiring practices induce discrimination on freelancing platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Xiaochuan Song & Graham H. Lowman & Peter Harms, 2020. "Justice for the Crowd: Organizational Justice and Turnover in Crowd-Based Labor," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-37, November.
    3. Chen, Changdong, 2024. "How consumers respond to service failures caused by algorithmic mistakes: The role of algorithmic interpretability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Celiktutan, Begum & Klesse, Anne-Kathrin & Tuk, Mirjam A., 2024. "Acceptability lies in the eye of the beholder: Self-other biases in GenAI collaborations," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 496-512.
    5. Niki Panteli & Andriana Rapti & Dora Scholarios, 2020. "‘If He Just Knew Who We Were’: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 476-494, June.
    6. Yao, Qiongrui (Missy) & Baker, LaKami T. & Lohrke, Franz T., 2022. "Building and sustaining trust in remote work by platform-dependent entrepreneurs on digital labor platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 327-339.
    7. Arab ul Mateen & Qasim Ali Nisar & Samia Jamshed & Sumaira Rehman & Muhammad Ali, 2025. "HRM Effectiveness as an Outcome of Big Data: The Role of Big Data–Driven HR Practices and Electronic HRM," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11339-11373, September.
    8. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu, 2020. "The Mirage of Procedural Justice and the Primacy of Interactional Justice in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 495-512, December.
    9. Deriu, Valerio & Pozharliev, Rumen & De Angelis, Matteo, 2024. "How trust and attachment styles jointly shape job candidates’ AI receptivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Dirk Lindebaum & Christine Moser & Gazi Islam, 2024. "Big Data, Proxies, Algorithmic Decision‐Making and the Future of Management Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(6), pages 2724-2747, September.
    11. Melinda Timea Fülöp & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Dan Ioan Topor, 2025. "Digital business world and ethical dilemmas: a systematic literature review," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 23-41, March.
    12. Yang, Hui & Li, Dan & Hu, Peng, 2024. "Decoding algorithm fatigue: The role of algorithmic literacy, information cocoons, and algorithmic opacity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Maurizio Atzeni & Lorenzo Cini, 2024. "New theories and politics for working class organizing in the gig and precarious world of work," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(3), pages 937-958, August.
    14. Wenhao Luo & Yuelin Zhang & Maona Mu, 2025. "Why might AI-enabled interviews reduce candidates’ job application intention? The role of procedural justice and organizational attractiveness," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Qinhai Ma & Mengyi Li & Guanghui Shi & Tianshu Zhou, 2023. "The promotional effect of interpersonal attraction of service employees on customer engagement in the S-D logic," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(11), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Yang, Yikai & Zheng, Jiehui & Yu, Yining & Qiu, Yiling & Wang, Lei, 2024. "The role of recommendation sources and attribute framing in online product recommendations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Suen, Hung-Yue & Hung, Kuo-En, 2024. "Revealing the influence of AI and its interfaces on job candidates' honest and deceptive impression management in asynchronous video interviews," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    18. Brad Greenwood & Idris Adjerid & Corey M. Angst & Nathan L. Meikle, 2022. "How Unbecoming of You: Online Experiments Uncovering Gender Biases in Perceptions of Ridesharing Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 499-518, January.
    19. Matthew O. Jackson & Qiaozhu Me & Stephanie W. Wang & Yutong Xie & Walter Yuan & Seth Benzell & Erik Brynjolfsson & Colin F. Camerer & James Evans & Brian Jabarian & Jon Kleinberg & Juanjuan Meng & Se, 2025. "AI Behavioral Science," Papers 2509.13323, arXiv.org.
    20. Hai Lan & Xiaofei Tang & Yong Ye & Huiqin Zhang, 2024. "Abstract or concrete? The effects of language style and service context on continuous usage intention for AI voice assistants," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:199:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05883-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.