Author
Abstract
A comprehensive and recent exploration into the relationship between Social Media Platforms (SMP) usage and Social Media Disorders (SMD) is currently investigated as a topic of increasing importance given the surge in SMP use over the last two decades. The approach of analyzing data from 479 individuals across various SMP using clustering is particularly noteworthy for identifying the risk profile of the users and understanding the diverse impacts of SMP on mental health. In this paper, a multiple-option descriptive-predictive framework for assessing the impact of the SMP on the psychological well-being is proposed. This method effectively categorizes mental health states into distinct groups, each indicating different levels of need for professional intervention. Out of 5 clustering algorithms, K-prototypes proved to bring the best results with a silhouette score of 0.596, whereas for predicting clusters, Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) outperformed K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Support Vector Classifier (SVC), providing the highest accuracy and F1 score (0.993). Moreover, we analyze the connectedness between each SMP, anxiety and depression. Two distinct clusters emerged: Cluster 0 “Stable Professionals”, Cluster 1 “Vibrant Students”, and new instances are seamlessly predicted. While Youtube is the most popular platform among the respondents, Instagram shows a relatively higher correlation with both anxiety (0.256) and depression (0.186), indicating a stronger association with these disorders compared to other platforms.
Suggested Citation
Simona-Vasilica Oprea & Adela Bâra, 2025.
"Assessing the Dual Impact of the Social Media Platforms on Psychological Well-being: A Multiple-Option Descriptive-Predictive Framework,"
Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(1), pages 377-404, July.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:compec:v:66:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10717-y
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-024-10717-y
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:66:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10717-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.