IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v65y2025i6d10.1007_s10614-024-10694-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations

Author

Listed:
  • Omer Burak Akgun

    (Fibabanka R & D Center)

  • Emrah Gulay

    (Dokuz Eylul University)

Abstract

The modeling and forecasting of return volatility for the top three cryptocurrencies, which are identified by the highest trading volumes, is the main focus of the study. Eleven different GARCH-type models were analyzed using a comprehensive methodology in six different distributions, and deep learning algorithms were used to rigorously assess each model’s forecasting performance. Additionally, the study investigates the impact of selecting dynamic parameters for the forecasting performance of these models. This study investigates if there are any appreciable differences in forecast outcomes between the two different realized variance calculations and variations in training size. Further investigation focuses on how the use of expanding and rolling windows affects the optimal window type for forecasting. Finally, the importance of choosing different error measurements is emphasized in the framework of comparing forecasting performances. Our results indicate that in GARCH-type models, 5-minute realized variance shows the best forecasting performance, while in deep learning models, median realized variance (MedRV) has the best performance. Moreover, it has been determined that an increase in the training/test ratio and the selection of the rolling window approach both play important roles in achieving better forecast accuracy. Finally, our results show that deep learning models outperform GARCH-type models in volatility forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Omer Burak Akgun & Emrah Gulay, 2025. "Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 65(6), pages 3971-4013, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:65:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10694-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lahmiri, Salim, 2018. "Minute-ahead stock price forecasting based on singular spectrum analysis and support vector regression," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 444-451.
    2. Inoue, Atsushi & Jin, Lu & Rossi, Barbara, 2017. "Rolling window selection for out-of-sample forecasting with time-varying parameters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 55-67.
    3. Andersen, Torben G. & Dobrev, Dobrislav & Schaumburg, Ernst, 2012. "Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbor truncation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 75-93.
    4. Dyhrberg, Anne Haubo, 2016. "Bitcoin, gold and the dollar – A GARCH volatility analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 85-92.
    5. Nelson, Daniel B, 1991. "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 347-370, March.
    6. Mengxi He & Xianfeng Hao & Yaojie Zhang & Fanyi Meng, 2021. "Forecasting stock return volatility using a robust regression model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1463-1478, December.
    7. Bouoiyour, Jamal & Selmi, Refk, 2015. "Bitcoin Price: Is it really that New Round of Volatility can be on way?," MPRA Paper 65580, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Erdinc Akyildirim & Ahmet Goncu & Ahmet Sensoy, 2021. "Prediction of cryptocurrency returns using machine learning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 297(1), pages 3-36, February.
    9. Bollerslev, Tim, 1987. "A Conditionally Heteroskedastic Time Series Model for Speculative Prices and Rates of Return," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 69(3), pages 542-547, August.
    10. Christian Gillitzer & Martin McCarthy, 2019. "Does global inflation help forecast inflation in industrialized countries?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), pages 850-857, August.
    11. Fung, Kennard & Jeong, Jiin & Pereira, Javier, 2022. "More to cryptos than bitcoin: A GARCH modelling of heterogeneous cryptocurrencies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    12. Patton, Andrew J., 2011. "Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 160(1), pages 246-256, January.
    13. Andersen, Torben G & Bollerslev, Tim, 1998. "Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models Do Provide Accurate Forecasts," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 39(4), pages 885-905, November.
    14. Zhang, Yaojie & Ma, Feng & Liao, Yin, 2020. "Forecasting global equity market volatilities," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1454-1475.
    15. Liu, Lily Y. & Patton, Andrew J. & Sheppard, Kevin, 2015. "Does anything beat 5-minute RV? A comparison of realized measures across multiple asset classes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 293-311.
    16. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    17. Abeer ElBahrawy & Laura Alessandretti & Anne Kandler & Romualdo Pastor-Satorras & Andrea Baronchelli, 2017. "Evolutionary dynamics of the cryptocurrency market," Papers 1705.05334, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2017.
    18. Wang, Yijun & Andreeva, Galina & Martin-Barragan, Belen, 2023. "Machine learning approaches to forecasting cryptocurrency volatility: Considering internal and external determinants," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Andrés García-Medina & Ester Aguayo-Moreno, 2024. "LSTM–GARCH Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Volatility in Cryptocurrency Portfolios," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1511-1542, April.
    20. Ewees, Ahmed A. & Elaziz, Mohamed Abd & Alameer, Zakaria & Ye, Haiwang & Jianhua, Zhang, 2020. "Improving multilayer perceptron neural network using chaotic grasshopper optimization algorithm to forecast iron ore price volatility," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    21. Kate Murray & Andrea Rossi & Diego Carraro & Andrea Visentin, 2023. "On Forecasting Cryptocurrency Prices: A Comparison of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Ensembles," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, January.
    22. Jamal Bouoiyour & Refk Selmi, 2016. "Bitcoin: a beginning of a new phase?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(3), pages 1430-1440.
    23. Leandro Maciel, 2021. "Cryptocurrencies value‐at‐risk and expected shortfall: Do regime‐switching volatility models improve forecasting?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4840-4855, July.
    24. Viviane Naimy & Omar Haddad & Gema Fernández-Avilés & Rim El Khoury, 2021. "The predictive capacity of GARCH-type models in measuring the volatility of crypto and world currencies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    25. Engle, Robert F, 1982. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 987-1007, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trucíos, Carlos, 2019. "Forecasting Bitcoin risk measures: A robust approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 836-847.
    2. Mehmet Sahiner, 2022. "Forecasting volatility in Asian financial markets: evidence from recursive and rolling window methods," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(10), pages 1-74, October.
    3. Hassanniakalager, Arman & Baker, Paul L. & Platanakis, Emmanouil, 2024. "A False Discovery Rate approach to optimal volatility forecasting model selection," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 881-902.
    4. N. Antonakakis & J. Darby, 2013. "Forecasting volatility in developing countries' nominal exchange returns," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(21), pages 1675-1691, November.
    5. Nikolaos A. Kyriazis, 2021. "A Survey on Volatility Fluctuations in the Decentralized Cryptocurrency Financial Assets," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-46, June.
    6. McAleer, Michael & Medeiros, Marcelo C., 2008. "A multiple regime smooth transition Heterogeneous Autoregressive model for long memory and asymmetries," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 104-119, November.
    7. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & Zekokh, Timur, 2019. "Modelling volatility of cryptocurrencies using Markov-Switching GARCH models," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 143-155.
    8. Lyócsa, Štefan & Molnár, Peter & Výrost, Tomáš, 2021. "Stock market volatility forecasting: Do we need high-frequency data?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1092-1110.
    9. Yusui Tang & Feng Ma & Yaojie Zhang & Yu Wei, 2022. "Forecasting the oil price realized volatility: A multivariate heterogeneous autoregressive model," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4770-4783, October.
    10. Robert Ślepaczuk & Grzegorz Zakrzewski, 2009. "High-Frequency and Model-Free Volatility Estimators," Working Papers 2009-13, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    11. Lyócsa, Štefan & Plíhal, Tomáš & Výrost, Tomáš, 2021. "FX market volatility modelling: Can we use low-frequency data?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    12. Yaming Chang, 2025. "Improving volatility forecasts of the Nikkei 225 stock index using a realized EGARCH model with realized and realized range-based volatilities," Papers 2502.02695, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    13. Liang, Chao & Li, Yan & Ma, Feng & Wei, Yu, 2021. "Global equity market volatilities forecasting: A comparison of leverage effects, jumps, and overnight information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    14. Marcelo C. Carvalho & Marco Aurélio S. Freire & Marcelo Cunha Medeiros & Leonardo R. Souza, 2006. "Modeling and Forecasting the Volatility of Brazilian Asset Returns: a Realized Variance Approach," Brazilian Review of Finance, Brazilian Society of Finance, vol. 4(1), pages 55-77.
    15. Ma, Feng & Li, Yu & Liu, Li & Zhang, Yaojie, 2018. "Are low-frequency data really uninformative? A forecasting combination perspective," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 92-108.
    16. Jun Lu & Shao Yi, 2022. "Reducing Overestimating and Underestimating Volatility via the Augmented Blending-ARCH Model," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 48-59, May.
    17. Harry Vander Elst, 2015. "FloGARCH : Realizing long memory and asymmetries in returns volatility," Working Paper Research 280, National Bank of Belgium.
    18. Ñíguez, Trino-Manuel & Perote, Javier, 2017. "Moments expansion densities for quantifying financial risk," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 53-69.
    19. Marcin Fałdziński & Piotr Fiszeder & Witold Orzeszko, 2020. "Forecasting Volatility of Energy Commodities: Comparison of GARCH Models with Support Vector Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Tomáš Plíhal, 2021. "Scheduled macroeconomic news announcements and Forex volatility forecasting," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1379-1397, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:65:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10694-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.