IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v64y2024i1d10.1007_s10614-023-10435-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Non-additivity Valuations, Cash Flows and Sales Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Maryam Eghbal

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Farzaneh Nassirzadeh

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Davood Askarany

    (The University of Auckland)

Abstract

This study examines the effects of non-additivity valuations on cash flows and sales growth by using the Choquet fuzzy approach as a pooled non-additive integral. The study targets 62 parent companies with 322 subsidiaries in the Tehran stock market from 2011 to 2019. The study divides firms' assets into four categories (inventories, receivables, fixed, and long-term investments). It uses the Choquet integral's properties to determine the firms' total non-additivity values. The Choquet integral approach used in this study considers the synergy of a set's componential factors in different measurements by considering and implementing the weights and coefficients of the elements. The results indicate that while the market valuation of companies (based on non-additivity valuations) has no significant correlation with their operating cash flows, it has a positive correlation with their sales growth, which could be attributed to the synergy created by the business combination of the parent companies with their subsidiaries. Moreover, the findings show a significant correlation between sales growth and the market price-to-book ratio as a simple approach to measuring a company's performance. However, the results suggest that non-additivity valuations offer a better estimation in measuring the efficiency of companies than market price-to-book ratio-based approaches. Indeed, the valuations of companies are determined based on their abilities in using their resources compared to similar companies in the same industry when they use non-additivity valuations. These findings are expected to be very helpful for potential investors and shareholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Maryam Eghbal & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Davood Askarany, 2024. "The Relationship Between Non-additivity Valuations, Cash Flows and Sales Growth," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 429-459, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:64:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-023-10435-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-023-10435-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-023-10435-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-023-10435-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Lazzati & Amilcar A. Menichini, 2018. "A Dynamic Model of Firm Valuation," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 53(3), pages 499-531, August.
    2. Grabisch, Michel & Kojadinovic, Ivan & Meyer, Patrick, 2008. "A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 766-785, April.
    3. Beliakov, Gleb, 2022. "Knapsack problems with dependencies through non-additive measures and Choquet integral," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 277-286.
    4. Sudipta Basu & Gregory Waymire, 2008. "Has the importance of intangibles really grown? And if so, why?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 171-190.
    5. Holthausen, Robert W. & Watts, Ross L., 2001. "The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 3-75, September.
    6. Core, John E. & Guay, Wayne R. & Buskirk, Andrew Van, 2003. "Market valuations in the New Economy: an investigation of what has changed," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-3), pages 43-67, January.
    7. Iris Bergmann & Wolfgang Schultze, 2018. "Accounting based valuation: a simultaneous equations model for forecasting earnings to proxy for ‘other information’," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1057-1091, May.
    8. Luca Anzilli & Silvio Giove, 2020. "Multi-criteria and medical diagnosis for application to health insurance systems: a general approach through non-additive measures," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 559-582, December.
    9. Altekin, F. Tevhide & Bukchin, Yossi, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization approach for exploring the cost and makespan trade-off in additive manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 235-253.
    10. Salima Yassia Paul & Cherif Guermat & Susela Devi, 2018. "Why do firms invest in accounts receivable? An empirical investigation of the Malaysian manufacturing sector," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 166-184, May.
    11. Perederieieva, Olga & Raith, Andrea & Schmidt, Marie, 2018. "Non-additive shortest path in the context of traffic assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 325-338.
    12. Cláudia Custódio, 2014. "Mergers and Acquisitions Accounting and the Diversification Discount," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 219-240, February.
    13. Jeremy Andrew Nicholls, 2020. "Integrating financial, social and environmental accounting," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(4), pages 745-769, February.
    14. George Wu & Richard Gonzalez, 1999. "Nonlinear Decision Weights in Choice Under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 74-85, January.
    15. Sheraz Ahmed, 2015. "Determinants of the quality of disclosed earnings and value relevance across transitional Europe," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 325-349, August.
    16. Mohsen Tavakoli Shandiz & Farzaneh Nassir Zadeh & Davood Askarany, 2022. "The Interactive Effect of Ownership Structure on the Relationship between Annual Board Report Readability and Stock Price Crash Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Abbas Ali Daryaei & Yasin Fattahi & Davood Askarany & Saeed Askary & Mahdad Mollazamani, 2022. "Accounting Comparability, Conservatism, Executive Compensation-Performance, and Information Quality," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, October.
    18. Omid Mehri Namakavarani & Abbas Ali Daryaei & Davood Askarany & Saeed Askary, 2021. "Audit Committee Characteristics and Quality of Financial Information: The Role of the Internal Information Environment and Political Connections," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Gerami, Javad & Mozaffari, Mohammad Reza & Wanke, Peter F. & Correa, Henrique L., 2022. "Improving information reliability of non-radial value efficiency analysis: An additive slacks based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 967-978.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    2. Luc Paugam & Jean‐François Casta & Hervé Stolowy, 2018. "Non‐additivity in Accounting Valuation: Theory and Applications," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(3), pages 381-416, September.
    3. Mahla Afghahi & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Davood Askarany, 2024. "Exploring the impact of customer concentration on stock price crash risk," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Jean-François Casta & Luc Paugam & Hervé Stolowy, 2011. "Non-additivity in accounting valuation: Internally generated goodwill as an aggregation of interacting assets," Post-Print halshs-00541525, HAL.
    5. Wen He & Ki Hoon Hong & Eliza Wu, 2020. "Does Investor Sentiment Affect the Value Relevance of Accounting Information?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(4), pages 535-560, December.
    6. Luc Paugam & Pierre Astolfi & Olivier Ramond, 2015. "Accounting for business combinations: Do purchase price allocations matter?," Post-Print hal-01277376, HAL.
    7. Gijs van de Kuilen & Peter P. Wakker, 2011. "The Midweight Method to Measure Attitudes Toward Risk and Ambiguity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 582-598, March.
    8. Douglas Skinner, 2008. "Accounting for intangibles – a critical review of policy recommendations," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 191-204.
    9. Jamal Barzegari Khanagha, 2011. "Value Relevance of Accounting Information in the United Arab Emirates," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 1(2), pages 33-45, June.
    10. Pierre Astolfi & Luc Paugam & Olivier Ramond, 2012. "Purchase Price Allocations: Do they Matter?," Post-Print halshs-00671611, HAL.
    11. Samudhram, Ananda & Stewart, Errol & Wickramanayake, Jayasinghe & Sinnakkannu, Jothee, 2014. "Value relevance of human capital based disclosures: Moderating effects of labor productivity, investor sentiment, analyst coverage and audit quality," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 338-353.
    12. Kothari, S. P. & Shanken, Jay, 2003. "Time-series coefficient variation in value-relevance regressions: a discussion of Core, Guay, and Van Buskirk and new evidence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-3), pages 69-87, January.
    13. Mihaela Alina ROBU, 2014. "The Level Of Knowledge In The Value Relevance Literature," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(4), pages 122-135, December.
    14. Schaberl, Philipp D., 2016. "Beyond accounting and back: An empirical examination of the relative relevance of earnings and “other” information," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 98-113.
    15. P. Astolfi & Luc Paugam & Olivier Ramond, 2012. "Purchase Price Allocations: Do they Matter?," Post-Print hal-00934973, HAL.
    16. Zhaoyang Gu, 2007. "Across‐sample Incomparability of R2s and Additional Evidence on Value Relevance Changes Over Time," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7‐8), pages 1073-1098, September.
    17. Stanley C. W. Salvary, 2003. "Financial accounting information and the relevance/irrelevance issue," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 140-175.
    18. Diecidue, Enrico & Wakker, Peter P, 2001. "On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 281-298, November.
    19. Sebastian Kronenberger & Volker Laux, 2022. "Conservative Accounting, Audit Quality, and Litigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2349-2362, March.
    20. Lam, Kevin C.K. & Sami, Heibatollah & Zhou, Haiyan, 2013. "Changes in the value relevance of accounting information over time: Evidence from the emerging market of China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 123-135.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:64:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-023-10435-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.