IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/buseco/v60y2025i2d10.1057_s11369-025-00393-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating the web of corporate dealings: related-party transactions, earnings management, and audit committee oversight

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Hoor

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Farzaneh Nassirzadeh

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

  • Davood Askarany

    (The University of Auckland)

  • Mohsen Tavakoli Shandiz

    (Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to contribute to a deeper understanding of the economic consequences of related-party transactions (RPTs) and earnings management on firm performance, market efficiency, and investment decisions by investigating how critical characteristics of audit committees—such as gender diversity, financial expertise, and independence—moderate the relationship between RPTs and earnings management, the research provides insights into the mechanisms that can safeguard the integrity of financial reporting. This study aims to bridge the gap in the existing literature by offering empirical evidence of how audit committee oversight can mitigate managerial opportunism, thus ensuring that financial reports accurately reflect a firm’s economic activities, which is critical for efficient capital markets and informed decision-making by business economists. This paper explores the intricate dynamics of related-party transactions, a distinctive facet of business dealings with implications for shareholder interests. The study meticulously examines the nuanced relationship between related-party transactions and both accrual and real earnings management, shedding light on potential mechanisms through which managerial opportunism may manifest. Additionally, the research delves into the moderating influence of key audit committee characteristics—gender diversity, financial expertise, committee size, and member independence—on the relationship mentioned above. Leveraging data from 1683 year-company observations spanning 2016 to 2020, the study employs a multivariate regression model, panel data analysis, and RStudio statistical software. The findings affirm a significant association between related-party transactions and both accrual and real earnings management. Moreover, the study reveals that gender diversity, financial expertise, and independence of audit committee members serve as influential moderators in this relationship. However, audit committee size does not significantly impact the connection between related-party transactions and earnings management. The research’s innovative approach lies in concurrently considering accrual and real earnings management in the context of related-party transactions and exploring the interactive effects of audit committee characteristics—an unexplored aspect. These findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between corporate transactions, earnings management, and the regulatory oversight provided by audit committees.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Hoor & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Davood Askarany & Mohsen Tavakoli Shandiz, 2025. "Navigating the web of corporate dealings: related-party transactions, earnings management, and audit committee oversight," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 99-115, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:buseco:v:60:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1057_s11369-025-00393-7
    DOI: 10.1057/s11369-025-00393-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s11369-025-00393-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s11369-025-00393-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570210441440 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Palmrose, Zv, 1986. "Audit Fees And Auditor Size - Further Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 97-110.
    3. Klein, April, 2002. "Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 375-400, August.
    4. Roychowdhury, Sugata, 2006. "Earnings management through real activities manipulation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 335-370, December.
    5. Dan Dhaliwal & Vic Naiker & Farshid Navissi, 2010. "The Association Between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Experts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 787-827, September.
    6. Park, Jihwon & Sani, Jalal & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2019. "Disclosure incentives when competing firms have common ownership," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 387-415.
    7. Nikos Vafeas, 2005. "Audit Committees, Boards, and the Quality of Reported Earnings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1093-1122, December.
    8. Kim Ittonen & Emma-Riikka Myllymäki & Per Christen Tronnes, 2019. "Banks’ audit committees, audit firm alumni and fees paid to audit firm," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(7), pages 783-807, June.
    9. Serrano-Cinca, Carlos & Gutiérrez-Nieto, Begoña & Bernate-Valbuena, Martha, 2019. "The use of accounting anomalies indicators to predict business failure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 353-375.
    10. Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Davood Askarany & Solmaz Arefi-Asl, 2023. "The Relationship between Changes in Corporate Governance Characteristics and Intellectual Capital," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, February.
    11. McCahery, J.A. & Vermeulen, E.P.M., 2005. "Does the European company prevent the 'Delaware-effect'?," Discussion Paper 2005, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    12. Azam Pouryousof & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Reza Hesarzadeh & Davood Askarany, 2022. "The Relationship between Managers’ Disclosure Tone and the Trading Volume of Investors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Zakaria Ali Aribi & Philip Kostov & Emhemmed Aghab, 2021. "Does female human capital constrain earning management: The case of the United Kingdom," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 588-603, October.
    14. Habib, Ahsan & Muhammadi, Abdul Haris & Jiang, Haiyan, 2017. "Political Connections and Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Indonesia," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 45-63.
    15. Xiao, Jianqiang & Sun, Sunny Li & Weng, David H., 2021. "The unfriendly board: Antecedents and consequences of board dissent," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 135-146.
    16. Jones, Jj, 1991. "Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 193-228.
    17. repec:eme:maj000:maj-01-2018-1766 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Mohsen Tavakoli Shandiz & Farzaneh Nassir Zadeh & Davood Askarany, 2022. "The Interactive Effect of Ownership Structure on the Relationship between Annual Board Report Readability and Stock Price Crash Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Akanksha Jalan & S. Badrinath & Bakr Al‐gamrh, 2020. "Women on audit committees and the relationship between related party transactions and earnings management," Post-Print hal-02898150, HAL.
    20. Patricia M. Dechow & Amy P. Hutton & Jung Hoon Kim & Richard G. Sloan, 2012. "Detecting Earnings Management: A New Approach," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 275-334, May.
    21. Abbas Ali Daryaei & Yasin Fattahi & Davood Askarany & Saeed Askary & Mahdad Mollazamani, 2022. "Accounting Comparability, Conservatism, Executive Compensation-Performance, and Information Quality," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-28, October.
    22. Richard A. Bernardi & David F. Bean & Kristen M. Weippert, 2002. "Signaling gender diversity through annual report pictures," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 609-616, October.
    23. El-Helaly, Moataz & Georgiou, Ifigenia & Lowe, Alan D., 2018. "The interplay between related party transactions and earnings management: The role of audit quality," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 47-60.
    24. Habib, Ahsan & Muhammadi, Abdul Haris & Jiang, Haiyan, 2017. "Political connections, related party transactions, and auditor choice: Evidence from Indonesia," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2022. "Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management: The Moderating Effect of ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Muhammad Asad & Saeed Akbar & Sabur Mollah, 2024. "The role of independent directors’ tenure and network in controlling real-earnings management practices," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1251-1279, November.
    3. Mao, Yaping & Renneboog, Luc, 2015. "Do managers manipulate earnings prior to management buyouts?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 43-61.
    4. Ujkan Bajra & Simon Cadez, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Quality on Earnings Management: Evidence from European Companies Cross†listed in the US," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(2), pages 152-166, June.
    5. Zalata, Alaa Mansour & Tauringana, Venancio & Tingbani, Ishmael, 2018. "Audit committee financial expertise, gender, and earnings management: Does gender of the financial expert matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 170-183.
    6. Benjamin T. Albersmann & Daniela Hohenfels, 2017. "Audit Committees and Earnings Management – Evidence from the German Two-Tier Board System," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(2), pages 147-178, May.
    7. Ioannis Dokas & Christos Leontidis & Nicolaos Eriotis & Konstantinos Hazakis, 2021. "Earnings Management. An overview of the relative literature," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 25-55.
    8. Abbasi, Kaleemullah & Alam, Ashraful & Bhuiyan, Md. Borhan Uddin, 2020. "Audit committees, female directors and the types of female and male financial experts: Further evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 186-197.
    9. Ramesh Chandra Das & Chandra Sekhar Mishra & Prabina Rajib, 2017. "Real Versus Accrual-based Earnings Management," Paradigm, , vol. 21(2), pages 156-174, December.
    10. Dichev, Ilia D. & Graham, John R. & Harvey, Campbell R. & Rajgopal, Shiva, 2013. "Earnings quality: Evidence from the field," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 1-33.
    11. Ghafran, Chaudhry & O'Sullivan, Noel & Yasmin, Sofia, 2022. "When does audit committee busyness influence earnings management in the UK? Evidence on the role of the financial crisis and company size," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    12. Ali, Ashiq & Zhang, Weining, 2015. "CEO tenure and earnings management," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 60-79.
    13. Sarfraz Khan & John K. Wald, 2015. "Director Liability Protection, Earnings Management, and Audit Pricing," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 781-814, December.
    14. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    15. Theodore E. Christensen & Adrienna Huffman & Melissa F. Lewis‐Western & Rachel Scott, 2022. "Accruals earnings management proxies: Prudent business decisions or earnings manipulation?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3-4), pages 536-587, March.
    16. Bajra, Ujkan & Čadež, Simon, 2018. "Audit committees and financial reporting quality: The 8th EU Company Law Directive perspective," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 151-163.
    17. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    18. Marwan Altarawneh & Mohammad Abedalrahman Alhmood & Ala’a Zuhair Mansour & Aidi Ahmi, 2023. "Comprehensive Bibliometric Mapping of Publication Trends in Earnings Management," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 179-203.
    19. Badar Nadeem Ashraf & Ningyu Qian, 2021. "The Impact of Board Internationalization on Real Earnings Management: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    20. Li, Chunyu & Lou, Chenxin & Luo, Dan & Xing, Kai, 2021. "Chinese corporate distress prediction using LASSO: The role of earnings management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:buseco:v:60:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1057_s11369-025-00393-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.