IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jis/ejistu/y2012i01id359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Requirements for Participatory Framework on Governmental Policy Level

Author

Listed:
  • MIKULSKIENE Birute
  • PITRENAITE Birute

Abstract

The article seeks to specify the requirements of the framework for public participation in policy making on the governmental level aiming to elaborate a substantial content of the participatory policy. The research methodology engages both qualitative and quantitative approaches based on document analysis and interviews. We analysed a range of documents, issued by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Lithuania, where participatory groups are nominated for the annual terms of 2007 and 2010. Results of the research testify that, notwithstanding the considerable number of participatory facts, public administrators hold more than a half of the places in the participatory groups. Stakeholders other than public administrators are considered to be rather consultants than partners in policy development. We suggest that for a substantial, effective and efficient participation framework, several requirements should be met including a correct arena for stakes’ expression; completeness of the stake representation; balanced stake representation; sensitivity to research based evidence; monitoring and evaluation of participation quality.

Suggested Citation

  • MIKULSKIENE Birute & PITRENAITE Birute, 2012. "Requirements for Participatory Framework on Governmental Policy Level," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2012:i:01:id:359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejist.ro/files/pdf/359.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ejist.ro/abstract/359/Requirements-for-Participatory-Framework-on-Governmental-Policy-Level.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie L. Ozanne & Bige Saatcioglu & Canan Corus, 2009. "The Philosophy and Methods of Deliberative Democracy: Implications for Public Policy and Marketing," Post-Print hal-00491678, HAL.
    2. Corus, Canan & Ozanne, Julie L., 2012. "Stakeholder engagement: Building participatory and deliberative spaces in subsistence markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1728-1735.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srinivas Venugopal, 2021. "Envisioning a community‐centric approach to impact assessments in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 118-133, March.
    2. Ionel JIANU, 2015. "The Role of Food Companies in Consumer Protection Through the Sustainable Reporting," The Journal of Accounting and Management, Danubius University of Galati, issue 3, pages 75-84, December.
    3. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Bigné, Enrique, 2018. "The determinants of stakeholder engagement in digital platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 404-410.
    4. Mingers, John, 2011. "Soft OR comes of age--but not everywhere!," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 729-741, December.
    5. Ferraris, Alberto & Belyaeva, Zhanna & Bresciani, Stefano, 2020. "The role of universities in the Smart City innovation: Multistakeholder integration and engagement perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 163-171.
    6. Linda D. Hollebeek & V. Kumar & Rajendra K. Srivastava & Moira K. Clark, 2023. "Moving the stakeholder journey forward," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 23-49, January.
    7. Corus, Canan & Ozanne, Julie L., 2012. "Stakeholder engagement: Building participatory and deliberative spaces in subsistence markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1728-1735.
    8. Sandra Moog & André Spicer & Steffen Böhm, 2015. "The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 469-493, May.
    9. Scott, Inara, 2017. "A business model for success: Enterprises serving the base of the pyramid with off-grid solar lighting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 50-55.
    10. Scandelius, Christina & Cohen, Geraldine, 2016. "Achieving collaboration with diverse stakeholders—The role of strategic ambiguity in CSR communication," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3487-3499.
    11. Clark, Moira K. & Lages, Cristiana Raquel & Hollebeek, Linda D., 2020. "Friend or foe? Customer engagement’s value-based effects on fellow customers and the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 549-556.
    12. Silvia Biraghi & Rossella Gambetti & Stefania Romenti, 2017. "Stakeholder Engagement beyond the Tension between Idealism and Practical Concerns," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Barić, Andrija & Omazić, Mislav Ante & Aleksić, Ana, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholders’ Management of Export Companies in Foreign Markets," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 160-167, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    14. Cristina Neesham & Jun Gu, 2015. "Strengthening Moral Judgment: A Moral Identity-Based Leverage Strategy in Business Ethics Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 527-534, October.
    15. Nair, Suja R., 2020. "The link between women entrepreneurship, innovation and stakeholder engagement: A review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 283-290.
    16. Joseph L. Scarpaci & Benjamin K. Sovacool & Ronnie Ballantyne, 2016. "A Critical Review of the Costs of Advertising: a Transformative Consumer Research Perspective," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 119-140, June.
    17. Martina Hutton & Canan Corus & Joshua Dorsey & Elizabeth Minton & Caroline Roux & Christopher P. Blocker & Jonathan Z. Zhang, 2022. "Getting real about consumer poverty: Deep processes for transformative action," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1332-1355, September.
    18. Gurău, Călin & Dana, Léo-Paul, 2018. "Environmentally-driven community entrepreneurship: Mapping the link between natural environment, local community and entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 221-231.
    19. Mark Alan Heuer & Usman Khalid & Stefan Seuring, 2020. "Bottoms up: Delivering sustainable value in the base of the pyramid," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1605-1616, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    interest representation; stakeholders; participatory framework; policy making;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jis:ejistu:y:2012:i:01:id:359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alina Popescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.