IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00491678.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Philosophy and Methods of Deliberative Democracy: Implications for Public Policy and Marketing

Author

Listed:
  • Julie L. Ozanne

    (R.B. Pamplin College of Business - Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University [Blacksburg])

  • Bige Saatcioglu

    (GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Canan Corus

    (Tobin College of Business - St. John's University)

Abstract

Urgent social problems increasingly arise at the intersection of the interests of business leaders, policy makers, and consumers. The authors argue that deliberative democracy offers a fruitful approach for understanding marketing¿s impact on society by revealing the complex and often conflicting network of interests among stakeholders. Deliberative methods hold promise for easing constraints on civic engagement and increasing consumer empowerment. The authors explore the historical and philosophical underpinnings of deliberative democracy. Specifically, they evaluate popular methods and applications of deliberative democracy and examine the implications for public policy and marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie L. Ozanne & Bige Saatcioglu & Canan Corus, 2009. "The Philosophy and Methods of Deliberative Democracy: Implications for Public Policy and Marketing," Post-Print hal-00491678, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00491678
    DOI: 10.1509/jppm.28.1.29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. MIKULSKIENE Birute & PITRENAITE Birute, 2012. "Requirements for Participatory Framework on Governmental Policy Level," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    2. Mingers, John, 2011. "Soft OR comes of age--but not everywhere!," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 729-741, December.
    3. Martina Hutton & Canan Corus & Joshua Dorsey & Elizabeth Minton & Caroline Roux & Christopher P. Blocker & Jonathan Z. Zhang, 2022. "Getting real about consumer poverty: Deep processes for transformative action," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1332-1355, September.
    4. Joseph L. Scarpaci & Benjamin K. Sovacool & Ronnie Ballantyne, 2016. "A Critical Review of the Costs of Advertising: a Transformative Consumer Research Perspective," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 119-140, June.
    5. Srinivas Venugopal, 2021. "Envisioning a community‐centric approach to impact assessments in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 118-133, March.
    6. Corus, Canan & Ozanne, Julie L., 2012. "Stakeholder engagement: Building participatory and deliberative spaces in subsistence markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1728-1735.
    7. Sandra Moog & André Spicer & Steffen Böhm, 2015. "The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 469-493, May.
    8. Cristina Neesham & Jun Gu, 2015. "Strengthening Moral Judgment: A Moral Identity-Based Leverage Strategy in Business Ethics Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 527-534, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00491678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.