IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v14y2025i2p35.html

Academic Fraud in the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for Faculty Promotion and Tenure

Author

Listed:
  • Julio Muniz Perez
  • Timothy Scott Mattison

Abstract

Since its emergence in 2022 through OpenAI, generative artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has represented a major technological breakthrough with the potential to revolutionize higher education systems. However, in addition to being a potentially helpful work tool, GenAI can also enable academic fraud. The purpose of this manuscript is to propose the foundations of a legal framework for addressing academic fraud in university faculty promotion and tenure that is facilitated by the use of GenAI. This manuscript begins with an introduction outlining how current GenAI capabilities could be used to engage in academic fraud. The manuscript then examines the underlying ethical systems in higher education that underpin decisions to utilize GenAI broadly, as well as more specifically in the creative process of scholarship. This discussion is followed by a section that explains the incentives to engage in academic fraud caused by national policies and university systems governing the promotion and tenure of faculty members in the United States (U.S.) and Spain/Europe. The legal framework at the end of this manuscript provides policymakers in government and university administration with interrelated concepts to guide the drafting of new policies that would govern the use of GenAI in academic scholarship. As stated in the concluding section, the authors have designed an empirical study to test the response to their proposed legal framework among faculty researchers, considering their systems of ethics and incentives that undergird temptations to engage in academic fraud. The authors present this manuscript as a primer for that future study.

Suggested Citation

  • Julio Muniz Perez & Timothy Scott Mattison, 2025. "Academic Fraud in the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) for Faculty Promotion and Tenure," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(2), pages 1-35, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/27497/16913
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/27497
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter Kickert, 2007. "Public Management Reforms in Countries with a Napoleonic State Model: France, Italy and Spain," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Christopher Pollitt & Sandra Thiel & Vincent Homburg (ed.), New Public Management in Europe, chapter 3, pages 26-51, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Ted I. K. Youn & Tanya M. Price, 2009. "Learning from the Experience of Others: The Evolution of Faculty Tenure and Promotion Rules in Comprehensive Institutions," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(2), pages 204-237, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amani M. Taylor & Arien J. Hernandez & Aysha K. Peterson & Sikina Jinnah, 2022. "Faculty diversity in California environmental studies departments: implications for student learning," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 490-504, September.
    2. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    3. Celeste Suart & Kaitlyn Neuman & Ray Truant, 2022. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived publication pressure among academic researchers in Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Tony Ross-Hellauer & Thomas Klebel & Petr Knoth & Nancy Pontika, 2024. "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(3), pages 337-351.
    5. Mark D Lindner & Richard K Nakamura, 2015. "Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Pierre Boutros & Ali Fakih & Sara Kassab & Zeina Lizzaik, 2022. "Does the Number of Publications Matter for Academic Promotion in Higher Education? Evidence from Lebanon," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Adriana Bruno & Martina Dal Molin, 2022. "The implementation of PMS in Italian universities: A longitudinal analysis," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 59-78.
    8. Peter V. Schaeffer & Scott Loveridge, 2009. "Regional Science and State Rural Policy Research," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 32(4), pages 509-522, October.
    9. Elissa L. Perry & Carol T. Kulik & David B. Mendelsohn & DaHee Shon, 2022. "Faculty Gender Diversity, Institutional Performance, and the Role of Diversity Climate," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(7), pages 1204-1236, November.
    10. Mussari Riccardo & Sorrentino Daniela, 2017. "Italian Public Sector Accounting Reform: A Step Towards European Public Sector Accounting Harmonisation," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 137-153, July.
    11. Cruz-Castro, Laura & Sanz-Menendez, Luis, 2021. "What should be rewarded? Gender and evaluation criteria for tenure and promotion," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0234912 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Meredith T Niles & Lesley A Schimanski & Erin C McKiernan & Juan Pablo Alperin, 2020. "Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.