IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v4y2015i4p69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Transfers from Management Earnings Forecasts: Irrational Underreaction and Subsequent Correction

Author

Listed:
  • Wu-Lung Li
  • Kenneth Zheng

Abstract

Prior literature has documented intra-industry information transfers from earnings announcements and management forecasts. The underlying cause of these observations is that a firm’s earnings announcements or forecasts contain information about earnings prospects of other firms in the same industry. While a majority of papers in this line of literature focuses on peer firms’ stock movements in response to the earnings reports or forecasts of the announcing or forecasting firms, respectively, we examine specifically whether investors’ reaction to information transfers from management earnings forecasts is rational. For nonforecasting firms, we find that investors consistently underreact to information transfers from peer firms’ management forecasts. Further, the underreaction is corrected when nonforecasting firms subsequently make earnings announcements. For late forecasting firms, the underreaction is only partly corrected when they release earnings forecasts subsequent to early forecasters, presumably due to the credibility concerns of management forecasts. The underreaction is further corrected when late forecasting firms later announce earnings. Finally, we partition forecast news based on whether the news implies industry commonalities or competitive shifts. We find evidence of underreaction to both the news containing industry commonalities and that containing competitive shifts.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Wu-Lung Li & Kenneth Zheng, 2015. "Information Transfers from Management Earnings Forecasts: Irrational Underreaction and Subsequent Correction," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-69, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/8029/5201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/8029
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongtae Kim & Michael Lacina & Myung Seok Park, 2008. "Positive and Negative Information Transfers from Management Forecasts," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 885-908, September.
    2. John Eshleman & Peng Guo, 2014. "The market’s use of supplier earnings information to value customers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 405-422, August.
    3. Baginski, Sp, 1987. "Intraindustry Information Transfers Associated With Management Forecasts Of Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 196-216.
    4. Brown, P, 1989. "Ball And Brown [1968]," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27, pages 202-217.
    5. Ray Ball & Lakshmanan Shivakumar, 2008. "How Much New Information Is There in Earnings?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 975-1016, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Eshleman & Peng Guo, 2014. "The market’s use of supplier earnings information to value customers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 405-422, August.
    2. Qiu, Jiayue & Wu, Hai & Zhang, Lijuan, 2021. "In name only: Information spillovers among Chinese firms with similar stock names during earnings announcements," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Cox, Raymond A.K. & Dayanandan, Ajit & Donker, Han, 2016. "The Ricochet Effect of Bad News," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 385-401.
    4. Clare Wang, 2014. "Accounting Standards Harmonization and Financial Statement Comparability: Evidence from Transnational Information Transfer," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 955-992, September.
    5. Ole-Kristian Hope & Wuyang Zhao, 2018. "Market reactions to the closest peer firm’s analyst revisions," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 345-372, June.
    6. Liu, Beibei & Tan, Keqi & Wong, Sonia M.L. & Yip, Rita W.Y., 2022. "Intra-industry information transfer in emerging markets: Evidence from China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Samuel B. Bonsall & Zahn Bozanic & Paul E.. Fischer, 2013. "What Do Management Earnings Forecasts Convey About the Macroeconomy?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 225-266, May.
    8. Hu, Ting & Chi, Yanzhe, 2019. "Can short selling activity predict the future returns of non-shortable peer firms?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 165-185.
    9. Richard A. Schneible Jr & Neil Fargher, 2016. "Information transfer and firm-level strategy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(4), pages 1119-1148, December.
    10. Tiantian Gu & Anand Venkateswaran, 2018. "Firm-supplier relations and managerial compensation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 621-649, October.
    11. Beaver, William H. & McNichols, Maureen F. & Wang, Zach Z., 2020. "Increased market response to earnings announcements in the 21st century: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1).
    12. Karel Janda, 2019. "Earnings Stability and Peer Company Selection for Multiple Based Indirect Valuation," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 37-75, February.
    13. Nakazono, Yoshiyuki & Koga, Maiko & Sugo, Tomohiro, 2020. "Private information and analyst coverage: Evidence from firm survey data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 284-298.
    14. Ravenscroft, Sue & Williams, Paul F., 2009. "Making imaginary worlds real: The case of expensing employee stock options," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 770-786, August.
    15. Jeffrey J. Coulton & Tami Dinh & Andrew B. Jackson & Tom Smith, 2016. "The impact of sentiment on price discovery," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(3), pages 669-694, September.
    16. Fernandes, Marcelo & Igan, Deniz & Pinheiro, Marcelo, 2020. "March madness in Wall Street: (What) does the market learn from stress tests?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    17. Roy Cerqueti & Francesca Pampurini & Annagiulia Pezzola & Anna Grazia Quaranta, 2022. "Dangerous liasons and hot customers for banks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 65-89, July.
    18. Matsumoto, Dawn A. & Shaikh, Sarah, 2017. "Discussion of “When does the peer information environment matter?”," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 215-220.
    19. Stephen Taylor & Alex Tong, 2020. "How efficient is the market for Australian firms’ earnings information?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 4225-4255, December.
    20. Ivan E. Brick & Oded Palmon & Dilip K. Patro, 2007. "Stock Price Response to Calls of Convertible Bonds: Still a Puzzle?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 36(2), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.