IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2016v3p149-168.html

Assessing National Environmental Performance In The Eastern Partnership Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin-Marius APOSTOAIE

    (CERNESIM Environmental Research Center, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Romania)

Abstract

Since the launch of the Eastern Partnership and up to the latest Summit, in May 2015, notable progress has been registered within the framework in various areas, especially in issues related to climate change, environment and energy. Nevertheless, significant environmental problems still linger and require urgent tailor-made solutions. The paper seeks to highlight the environmental status quo as well as the main environmental challenges that the six Eastern European partner countries are faced with, in the context of their intention of alignment to the EU environmental requirements. An understanding of how environmental protection is tackled within these countries may help identify specific models of action for approaching environmental degradation and climate change issues in Eastern Europe. Furthermore, the pressing nature of some environmental problems emphasized here may encourage policy makers to take specific actions towards reversing the troubling trends in environmental degradation and building a healthier society.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin-Marius APOSTOAIE, 2016. "Assessing National Environmental Performance In The Eastern Partnership Countries," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3, pages 149-168.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2016:v:3:p:149-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cse.uaic.ro/eurint/proceedings/index_htm_files/EURINT%202016_APO.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike W. Peng & Yuan Li & Longwei Tian, 2016. "Tian-ren-he-yi strategy: An Eastern perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 695-722, September.
    2. Ludmila BORTA, 2015. "The Eu’S Neighbourhood Trade Arrangements," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(4), pages 840-850, December.
    3. Isabel Gallego-Alvarez & Mª Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mª Purificación Galindo-Villardón & Miguel Rodríguez-Rosa, 2014. "Environmental Performance in Countries Worldwide: Determinant Factors and Multivariate Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Chao, Chi-Chur & Ee, Mong Shan & Laffargue, Jean-Pierre & Yu, Eden S.H., 2016. "Environmental migration and capital mobility," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 430-441.
    5. ., 2016. "The impact of development on the environment," Chapters, in: Economic Reform in Asia, chapter 9, pages 158-172, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Gomaa, Mohamed & Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran & Mestelman, Stuart & Shehata, Mohamed, 2015. "Exercising empowerment in an investment environment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 33-41.
    7. Alexandru Maxim & Costică Mihai & Constantin-Marius Apostoaie & Cristian Popescu & Costel Istrate & Ionel Bostan, 2016. "Implications and Measurement of Energy Poverty across the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-20, May.
    8. ., 2014. "Natural Environment," Chapters, in: Common Innovation, chapter 17, pages 144-152, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Oecd, 2012. "Green Growth and Environmental Governance in Eastern Europe, Caucasus, and Central Asia," OECD Green Growth Papers 2012/2, OECD Publishing.
    10. ., 2014. "Socio-Economic Environment," Chapters, in: Common Innovation, chapter 18, pages 153-164, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Curran, Giorel, 2017. "Social licence, corporate social responsibility and coal seam gas: framing the new political dynamics of contestation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 427-435.
    2. Kuznetsov, Andrei & Dinwoodie, John & Gibbs, David & Sansom, Mark & Knowles, Harriet, 2015. "Towards a sustainability management system for smaller ports," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 59-68.
    3. Worthington, Thomas A. & Zhang, Tianjiao & Logue, Daniel R. & Mittelstet, Aaron R. & Brewer, Shannon K., 2016. "Landscape and flow metrics affecting the distribution of a federally-threatened fish: Improving management, model fit, and model transferability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 1-18.
    4. Rigod, Boris & Tovar, Patricia, 2019. "Indonesia–Chicken: Tensions between International Trade and Domestic Food Policies?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 219-243, April.
    5. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    6. Roberto Cascante-Yarlequé & Purificación Galindo-Villardón & Fabricio Guevara-Viejó & José Luis Vicente-Villardón & Purificación Vicente-Galindo, 2025. "HJ-BIPLOT : A Theoretical and Empirical Systematic Review of Its 38 Years of History, Using Text Mining and LLMs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-35, June.
    7. Muhammad Sharif & Farzana Naheed Khan, 2023. "Unveiling the Implications of Energy Poverty for Educational Attainments in Pakistan: A Multidimensional Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 472-483, September.
    8. BOSTAN, Ionel, 2018. "If It Is The Topic Of The Research Of The Informal Economy," LawRxiv fy3g9, Center for Open Science.
    9. Na Zhao & Ming Zhao & Han Long & Liang Yuan, 2025. "Facing or evading? The impact of environmental taxes on the migration of heavily polluting enterprises in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 11773-11796, May.
    10. ARTENE, Alin, 1915. "Focusing economic research on the issues of sustainability and environmental protection," LawRxiv g7hpy, Center for Open Science.
    11. Bihong Huang & Yining Xu, 2019. "Environmental Performance in Asia: Overview, Drivers, and Policy Implications," ADBI Working Papers 990, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    12. BOSTAN, Ionel, 2018. "If It Is The Topic Of The Research Of The Informal Economy," LawArchive fy3g9_v1, Center for Open Science.
    13. George E. Halkos & Panagiotis-Stavros C. Aslanidis, 2023. "Addressing Multidimensional Energy Poverty Implications on Achieving Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, April.
    14. Dohyung Kim & Sun Go, 2020. "Human Capital and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2015. "Improving Australia's renewable energy project policy and planning: A multiple stakeholder analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 128-141.
    16. Phoumin, Han & Kimura, Fukunari, 2019. "Cambodia's energy poverty and its effects on social wellbeing: Empirical evidence and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 283-289.
    17. Anna Murawska & Patrycja Sieg & Szymon Stereńczak, 2025. "Environmental Safety and Self-Perceived Quality of Life and Health: The Example of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-32, September.
    18. Domguia, Edmond Noubissi & Ngounou, Borice Augustin & Pondie, Thierry Messie & Bitoto, Fabrice Ewolo, 2024. "Environmental tax and energy poverty: An economic approach for an environmental and social solution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    19. ARTENE, Alin, 2018. "Focusing economic research on the issues of sustainability and environmental protection," SocArXiv jc6f5, Center for Open Science.
    20. Pacudan, Romeo & Hamdan, Mahani, 2019. "Electricity tariff reforms, welfare impacts, and energy poverty implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 332-343.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2016:v:3:p:149-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.