IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isp/journl/v11y2017i1p499-509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact Of Demography, Institutional Solutions And Fiscal Incentives On The Level Of Participation And Investment Efficiency Of Occupational Pension Schemes In Central And Eastern Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Brzęczek
  • Marek Szczepański

Abstract

Investment efficiency of a pension system depends on economy, demography and capital market in a country. Those determinants were similar for Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia in the period 2009-2011. On the other hand, they differ in selected institutional factors and in the level of fiscal incentives. Hungary and Poland had systems arranged by employers, but Polish occupational pension schemes enjoyed the smallest fiscal stimulation. Czechia had an individual system, which was significantly financed by employers. Slovakia had a mixed, employer-individual system. Czech subsidies were among the highest in the world and Slovakian ones were very small. The objective is to estimate the influence of fiscal and institutional factors on investment efficiency and risk. The main result shows that the greater the subsidies, the lower the investment efficiency, but the higher the coverage rate. We argue for long term fiscal stimulation of employers that run voluntary occupational schemes. Occupational plans bear higher market risk than individual ones, but they invest in domestic enterprises and economy. Moreover, fiscal stimulation of individual plans redistributes income towards rich employees and financial institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Brzęczek & Marek Szczepański, 2017. "The Impact Of Demography, Institutional Solutions And Fiscal Incentives On The Level Of Participation And Investment Efficiency Of Occupational Pension Schemes In Central And Eastern Europe," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 11(1), pages 499-509.
  • Handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:499-509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scientific-publications.net/get/1000025/1508430223789134.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Banks & Carl Emmerson, 2000. "Public and private pension spending: principles, practice and the need for reform," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 1-63, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Laibson, 1997. "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 443-478.
    2. Afrika Ndongozi-Nsabimana, 2020. "Recettes fiscales et financement de la protection sociale dans les pays africains et d’Amérique Latine," Post-Print hal-03098710, HAL.
    3. Sheila Rose Darmaraj & Suresh Narayanan, 2019. "The Long-Term Financial Sustainability of the Civil Service Pension Scheme in Malaysia," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 18(1), pages 155-178, Winter/Sp.
    4. Krueger, Alan B. & Meyer, Bruce D., 2002. "Labor supply effects of social insurance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 33, pages 2327-2392, Elsevier.
    5. Richard Disney & Carl Emmerson & Sarah Smith, 2004. "Pension Reform and Economic Performance in Britain in the 1980s and 1990s," NBER Chapters, in: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980–2000, pages 233-274, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Richard Disney & Carl Emmerson, 2002. "Choice of pension scheme and job mobility in Britain," IFS Working Papers W02/09, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    7. Richard Blundell & Costas Meghir & Sarah Smith, 2004. "Pension Incentives and the Pattern of Retirement in the United Kingdom," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: Micro-Estimation, pages 643-690, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Orazio Attanasio & Susanne Rohwedder, 2001. "Pension wealth and household saving: evidence from pension reforms in the UK," IFS Working Papers W01/21, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    9. Nicholas Burton & Peter Galvin, 2022. "The effect of technology and regulation on the co-evolution of product and industry architecture," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(4), pages 1056-1085.
    10. Burton, Nicholas & Galvin, Peter, 2022. "Modularity, value and exceptions to the mirroring hypothesis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 635-650.
    11. Lei He & Zhengqi Wang, 2023. "The interaction effects of rising life expectancy and the public pension burden on aggregate savings and economic growth," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 22(2), pages 229-250, May.
    12. Afrika Ndongozi-Nsabimana, 2020. "Tax revenues and social protection financing in African and Latin American countries," Post-Print hal-03098695, HAL.
    13. Feldstein, Martin & Liebman, Jeffrey B., 2002. "Social security," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 32, pages 2245-2324, Elsevier.
    14. Paul van den Noord & Chistopher Heady, 2001. "Surveillance of Tax Policies: A Synthesis of Findings in Economic Surveys," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 303, OECD Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:499-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Svetoslav Ivanov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scientific-publications.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.