IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v54y2020i4p882-896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Air Traffic Control Capacity Planning Under Demand and Capacity Provision Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Starita

    (Sasin School of Management, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand;)

  • Arne K. Strauss

    (WHU–Otto Beisheim School of Management, 56179 Vallendar, Germany;)

  • Xin Fei

    (Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom;)

  • Radosav Jovanović

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;)

  • Nikola Ivanov

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;)

  • Goran Pavlović

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;)

  • Frank Fichert

    (Faculty of Tourism and Transport, Worms University of Applied Sciences, 67549 Worms, Germany)

Abstract

In air traffic management, a fundamental decision with large cost implications is the planning of future capacity provision. Here, capacity refers to the available man-hours of air traffic controllers to monitor traffic. Airspace can be partitioned in various ways into a collection of sectors, and each sector has a fixed maximum number of flights that may enter within a given time period. Each sector also requires a fixed number of man-hours to be operated; we refer to them as sector-hours. Capacity planning usually takes place a long time ahead of the day of operation to ensure that sufficiently many air traffic controllers are available to manage the flow of aircrafts. However, at the time of planning, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the number and spatiotemporal distribution of nonscheduled flights and capacity provision, the former mainly due to business aviation, and the latter usually stemming from the impact of weather, military use of airspaces, etc. Once the capacity decision has been made (in terms of committing to a budget of sector-hours per airspace to represent long-term staff scheduling), on the day of operation, we can influence traffic by enforcing rerouting and tactical delays. Furthermore, we can modify which sectors to open at a given time (the so-called sector-opening scheme) subject to the fixed capacity budgets in each airspace. The fundamental trade-off is between reducing the capacity provision cost at the expense of potentially increasing displacement cost arising from rerouting or delays. To tackle this, we propose a scalable decomposition approach that exploits the structure of the problem and can take traffic and capacity provision uncertainty into account by working with a large number of traffic scenarios. We propose several decision policies based on the resulting pool of solutions and test them numerically using real-world data.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Starita & Arne K. Strauss & Xin Fei & Radosav Jovanović & Nikola Ivanov & Goran Pavlović & Frank Fichert, 2020. "Air Traffic Control Capacity Planning Under Demand and Capacity Provision Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 882-896, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:54:y:2020:i:4:p:882-896
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2019.0962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2019.0962
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2019.0962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sarah Stock Patterson, 1998. "The Air Traffic Flow Management Problem with Enroute Capacities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 406-422, June.
    2. Majumdar, Arnab & Ochieng, Washington Yotto & Bentham, James & Richards, Martyn, 2005. "En-route sector capacity estimation methodologies: An international survey," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 375-387.
    3. Hanif D. Sherali & Raymond W. Staats & Antonio A. Trani, 2006. "An Airspace-Planning and Collaborative Decision-Making Model: Part II---Cost Model, Data Considerations, and Computations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 147-164, May.
    4. Hanif D. Sherali & Raymond W. Staats & Antonio A. Trani, 2003. "An Airspace Planning and Collaborative Decision-Making Model: Part I—Probabilistic Conflicts, Workload, and Equity Considerations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 434-456, November.
    5. Qin, Yan & Wang, Ruoxuan & Vakharia, Asoo J. & Chen, Yuwen & Seref, Michelle M.H., 2011. "The newsvendor problem: Review and directions for future research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 361-374, September.
    6. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel A. Nunez & Xue Bai & Linna Du, 2021. "Leveraging Slack Capacity in IaaS Contract Cloud Services," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 883-901, April.
    2. Künnen, Jan-Rasmus & Strauss, Arne K., 2022. "The value of flexible flight-to-route assignments in pre-tactical air traffic management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 76-96.
    3. Guglielmo Lulli & Amedeo Odoni & Bruno F. Santos, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Section: Air Transportation Systems Planning and Operations Under Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 855-857, July.
    4. Luis Delgado & G'erald Gurtner & Tatjana Boli'c & Lorenzo Castelli, 2021. "Estimating economic severity of Air Traffic Flow Management regulations," Papers 2112.11263, arXiv.org.
    5. Bolić, Tatjana & Castelli, Lorenzo & Corolli, Luca & Scaini, Giovanni, 2021. "Flexibility in strategic flight planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Liu, Wenjing & Zhao, Qiuhong & Delahaye, Daniel, 2022. "Research on slot allocation for airport network in the presence of uncertainty," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Silvia Zaoli & Giovanni Scaini & Lorenzo Castelli, 2021. "Community Detection for Air Traffic Networks and Its Application in Strategic Flight Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Marta Rojo, 2020. "Evaluation of Traffic Assignment Models through Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    2. Pellegrini, Paola & Rodriguez, Joaquin, 2013. "Single European Sky and Single European Railway Area: A system level analysis of air and rail transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 64-86.
    3. David Rey & Christophe Rapine & Rémy Fondacci & Nour-Eddin El Faouzi, 2016. "Subliminal Speed Control in Air Traffic Management: Optimization and Simulation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 240-262, February.
    4. Zhe Liang & Wanpracha Art Chaovalitwongse & Elsayed A. Elsayed, 2014. "Sequence Assignment Model for the Flight Conflict Resolution Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 334-350, August.
    5. Dimitris Bertsimas & Guglielmo Lulli & Amedeo Odoni, 2011. "An Integer Optimization Approach to Large-Scale Air Traffic Flow Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 211-227, February.
    6. Agustı´n, A. & Alonso-Ayuso, A. & Escudero, L.F. & Pizarro, C., 2012. "On air traffic flow management with rerouting. Part II: Stochastic case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 167-177.
    7. Hanif Sherali & Justin Hill, 2013. "Configuration of airspace sectors for balancing air traffic controller workload," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 3-31, March.
    8. Hanif D. Sherali & Justin M. Hill & Michael V. McCrea & Antonio A. Trani, 2011. "Integrating Slot Exchange, Safety, Capacity, and Equity Mechanisms Within an Airspace Flow Program," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 271-284, May.
    9. Sun, D. & Clinet, A. & Bayen, A.M., 2011. "A dual decomposition method for sector capacity constrained traffic flow optimization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 880-902, July.
    10. Neyshabouri, Saba & Berg, Bjorn P., 2017. "Two-stage robust optimization approach to elective surgery and downstream capacity planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 21-40.
    11. Wei, P. & Cao, Y. & Sun, D., 2013. "Total unimodularity and decomposition method for large-scale air traffic cell transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-16.
    12. David A. Goldberg & Martin I. Reiman & Qiong Wang, 2021. "A Survey of Recent Progress in the Asymptotic Analysis of Inventory Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1718-1750, June.
    13. van der Laan, Niels & Teunter, Ruud H. & Romeijnders, Ward & Kilic, Onur A., 2022. "The data-driven newsvendor problem: Achieving on-target service-levels using distributionally robust chance-constrained optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    14. Giovanni Andreatta & Lorenzo Brunetta & Guglielmo Guastalla, 2000. "From Ground Holding to Free Flight: An Exact Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 394-401, November.
    15. Cambier, Adrien & Chardy, Matthieu & Figueiredo, Rosa & Ouorou, Adam & Poss, Michael, 2022. "Optimizing subscriber migrations for a telecommunication operator in uncertain context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 308-321.
    16. Moon, Ilkyeong & Feng, Xuehao, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with a single supplier and multiple retailers considering customer arrival times and route selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 78-97.
    17. Mofidi, Seyed Shahab & Pazour, Jennifer A. & Roy, Debjit, 2018. "Proactive vs. reactive order-fulfillment resource allocation for sea-based logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 66-84.
    18. Madhukar Nagare & Pankaj Dutta & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, 2016. "Optimal ordering policy for newsvendor models with bidirectional changes in demand using expert judgment," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(3), pages 620-647, September.
    19. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Alonso-Ayuso, Antonio & Escudero, Laureano F. & Teresa Ortuno, M., 2003. "BFC, A branch-and-fix coordination algorithmic framework for solving some types of stochastic pure and mixed 0-1 programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 503-519, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:54:y:2020:i:4:p:882-896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.