IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v28y2026i3p742-761.html

Order Ahead for Pickup: Promise or Peril?

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Sun

    (Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5, Canada; and College of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey)

  • Yunan Liu

    (Supply Chain Optimization Technology, Amazon, New York, New York 10001; and Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695)

  • Luyi Yang

    (Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720)

Abstract

Problem definition : Mobile technologies have increasingly enabled remote customers to order ahead at quick-service restaurants. As customers travel to the service facility to pick up their orders, their orders also advance in the food preparation queue. It is widely believed that the ability to order ahead reduces customers’ total delay and, therefore, allows restaurants to attract more orders and achieve higher throughput than if customers must order onsite. Methodology/results : We build a queueing game–theoretic model to study a mixed ordering scheme in which some customers order ahead and some order on-site. Our analysis shows that the common practice of accepting all orders as they come in and requiring all orders to be irrevocable can cause a mixed ordering scheme to surprisingly achieve lower throughput than an on-site–only ordering scheme. The throughput shortfall can persist even when the service provider freely chooses whether to share queue-length information with remote customers. However, if remote customers who order ahead are allowed to cancel unprepared orders when they arrive at the service facility, then such a mixed ordering scheme with cancellation achieves higher throughput than the on-site–only ordering scheme even though it does not uniformly dominate the original mixed ordering scheme (without cancellations). We then study a capped ordering scheme in which the service provider stops accepting new remote orders if the number of outstanding orders reaches a certain threshold. When the service provider optimally sets the cap, the mixed–capped ordering scheme outperforms both the mixed ordering scheme without capping and the on-site–only ordering scheme in throughput but not necessarily the cancellation scheme. Finally, we propose an optimal mechanism in which the service provider determines both the capping and cancellation thresholds subject to customers’ individual rationality constraints. Managerial implications : Our paper highlights the unintended consequences of ordering ahead and provides prescriptive guidance for managing such a service system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Sun & Yunan Liu & Luyi Yang, 2026. "Order Ahead for Pickup: Promise or Peril?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 742-761, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:3:p:742-761
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2024.0865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2024.0865
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2024.0865?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    2. Fei Gao & Xuanming Su, 2018. "Omnichannel Service Operations with Online and Offline Self-Order Technologies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3595-3608, August.
    3. Manlu Chen & Ming Hu & Jianfu Wang, 2022. "Food Delivery Service and Restaurant: Friend or Foe?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6539-6551, September.
    4. Shiliang Cui & Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang, 2020. "The Economics of Line-Sitting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 227-242, January.
    5. Terry A. Taylor, 2018. "On-Demand Service Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 704-720, October.
    6. Baris Ata & Xiaoshan Peng, 2018. "An Equilibrium Analysis of a Multiclass Queue with Endogenous Abandonments in Heavy Traffic," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 163-183, January.
    7. Hassin, Refael, 1986. "Consumer Information in Markets with Random Product Quality: The Case of Queues and Balking," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(5), pages 1185-1195, September.
    8. Mehdi H. Farahani & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman, 2022. "Order Now, Pickup in 30 Minutes: Managing Queues with Static Delivery Guarantees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2013-2031, July.
    9. Opher Baron & Xiaole Chen & Yang Li, 2023. "Omnichannel Services: The False Premise and Operational Remedies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 865-884, February.
    10. Pnina Feldman & Andrew E. Frazelle & Robert Swinney, 2023. "Managing Relationships Between Restaurants and Food Delivery Platforms: Conflict, Contracts, and Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 812-823, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jinting & Guo, Pengfei & Wang, Yilin & Zhang, Lingjiao, 2024. "How should restaurants operate in the omnichannel era? A queueing game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Liron Ravner & Ran I. Snitkovsky, 2024. "Stochastic Approximation of Symmetric Nash Equilibria in Queueing Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(6), pages 2698-2725, November.
    3. Opher Baron & Xiaole Chen & Yang Li, 2023. "Omnichannel Services: The False Premise and Operational Remedies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 865-884, February.
    4. Tim S. G. van Eck & Pieter Kleer & Johan S. H. van Leeuwaarden, 2026. "Distributionally Robust Monopoly Pricing: Switching from Low to High Prices in Volatile Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 1248-1265, July.
    5. Li, Zhong-Ping & Perera, Sandun C. & Wang, Jian-Jun & Cheng, T.C.E., 2025. "Impacts of competitive and collaborative online channels on dual-channel healthcare supply chain operations: A patient loss aversion perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Sun, Ke, 2024. "Strategic responses to the aggregator platform: Pricing and information sharing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Mingliu Chen & Ming Hu, 2024. "Courier Dispatch in On-Demand Delivery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3789-3807, June.
    8. Manlu Chen & Ming Hu & Jianfu Wang, 2022. "Food Delivery Service and Restaurant: Friend or Foe?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6539-6551, September.
    9. Zhao, Chen & Wang, Zhongbin, 2023. "The impact of line-sitting on a two-server queueing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 782-800.
    10. Chenguang (Allen) Wu & Chen Jin & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2023. "Designing professional services: Pricing and prioritization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(8), pages 2578-2595, August.
    11. Xuefeng Gao & Junfei Huang & Jiheng Zhang, 2024. "Technical Note—Asymptotically Optimal Control of Omnichannel Service Systems with Pick-up Guarantees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(4), pages 1739-1748, July.
    12. Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang & Shiliang Cui & Jinting Wang, 2021. "In-queue priority purchase: a dynamic game approach," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 343-381, April.
    13. Geng Sun & Yeongin Kim & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2024. "Dinner at Your Doorstep: Service Innovation via the Gig Economy on Food Delivery Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1216-1234, September.
    14. Niels Agatz & Soo-Haeng Cho & Hao Sun & Hai Wang, 2024. "Transportation-Enabled Services: Concept, Framework, and Research Opportunities," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Ran Snitkovsky & Ricky Roet-Green & Jingwei Ji, 2026. "Foresee the Next Line: Customer Strategies and Information Disclosure in Tandem Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 682-699, March.
    16. Na Zhang & Anand Paul & Xu Sun, 2026. "Managing Service Systems with Overconfident Customers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 308-325, January.
    17. Liu, Minjian & Dong, Qi & Li, Yunbing & Du, Shaofu, 2026. "Navigating trade-offs in online food delivery: The interplay of buy-online-and-pick-up-in-store and delay insurance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    18. Jaelynn Oh & Chloe Kim Glaeser & Xuanming Su, 2026. "Food Ordering and Delivery: How Platforms and Restaurants Should Split the Pie," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1748-1768, March.
    19. Zhuoxin Li & Gang Wang, 2025. "On-Demand Delivery Platforms and Restaurant Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(7), pages 5788-5804, July.
    20. Jiaqi Zhou & Ilya O. Ryzhov, 2021. "Equilibrium analysis of observable express service with customer choice," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 99(3), pages 243-281, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:3:p:742-761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.