IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v28y2026i2p496-516.html

On the Supply of Autonomous Vehicles in Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Freund

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

  • Ilan Lobel

    (Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012)

  • Jiayu (Kamessi) Zhao

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

Abstract

Problem definition : The ongoing large-scale deployment of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology has the potential to fundamentally change the transportation landscape. Due to the high cost of AV hardware, the most likely path to widespread AV use is via platforms that can sustain high utilization, such as ride-hailing and delivery services. Our work studies the incentives of stakeholders in such deployments, possible misalignments, and contracting solutions to overcome them. Methodology/results : We consider four potential operational models to commercialize AVs, which we model as a supply chain game between a platform, an AV supplier, and human individual contractors (ICs), including (1) an open platform in which the AV supplier and ICs bring their own vehicles to the system, (2) an AV-supplier operated platform without ICs, (3) a platform that sources AVs through leasing contracts, and (4) an integrated supply chain. We find that except for the AV-only platform, all deployment models are subject to a risk of AV underutilization due to the need to maintain the ICs’ utilization sufficiently high to ensure ICs remain engaged. As AV underutilization propagates in a nonintegrated supply chain, an open platform can become arbitrarily worse than supply chain integration, and careful usage commitments are needed to overcome the efficiency loss. Managerial implications : This paper identifies a new kind of supply chain misalignment that is likely to emerge as AVs become deployed technology, which both platform operators and AV suppliers should be mindful of. Moreover, we demonstrate the value of usage commitment in the deployment of AVs through an open platform, which makes it more efficient than AV-only/AV leasing platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Freund & Ilan Lobel & Jiayu (Kamessi) Zhao, 2026. "On the Supply of Autonomous Vehicles in Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 496-516, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:496-516
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2024.1175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2024.1175
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2024.1175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard P. Cachon & Kaitlin M. Daniels & Ruben Lobel, 2017. "The Role of Surge Pricing on a Service Platform with Self-Scheduling Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 368-384, July.
    2. Jing-Sheng Song & Li Xiao & Hanqin Zhang & Paul Zipkin, 2017. "Optimal Policies for a Dual-Sourcing Inventory Problem with Endogenous Stochastic Lead Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 379-395, April.
    3. Terry A. Taylor & Erica L. Plambeck, 2007. "Simple Relational Contracts to Motivate Capacity Investment: Price Only vs. Price and Quantity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 94-113, January.
    4. Severance, Craig A., 2011. "A Practical, Affordable (and Least Business Risk) Plan to Achieve "80% Clean Electricity" by 2035," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 8-26, July.
    5. Varun Krishnan & Ramon Iglesias & Sebastien Martin & Su Wang & Varun Pattabhiraman & Garrett Van Ryzin, 2022. "Solving the Ride-Sharing Productivity Paradox: Priority Dispatch and Optimal Priority Sets," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 433-445, September.
    6. Aadhaar Chaturvedi & Elena Katok & Damian R. Beil, 2019. "Split-Award Auctions: Insights from Theory and Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 71-89, January.
    7. Schmitz, Patrick W, 2001. "The Hold-up Problem and Incomplete Contracts: A Survey of Recent Topics in Contract Theory," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. William P. Rogerson, 1992. "Contractual Solutions to the Hold-Up Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 59(4), pages 777-793.
    9. Kostas Bimpikis & Ozan Candogan & Daniela Saban, 2019. "Spatial Pricing in Ride-Sharing Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 744-769, May.
    10. Joseph J. Spengler, 1950. "Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(4), pages 347-347.
    11. Jing Dong & Rouba Ibrahimb, 2020. "Managing Supply in the On-Demand Economy: Flexible Workers, Full-Time Employees, or Both?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1238-1264, July.
    12. Manlu Chen & Ming Hu & Jianfu Wang, 2022. "Food Delivery Service and Restaurant: Friend or Foe?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6539-6551, September.
    13. Linwei Xin & David A. Goldberg, 2018. "Asymptotic Optimality of Tailored Base-Surge Policies in Dual-Sourcing Inventory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 437-452, January.
    14. Siddhartha Banerjee & Daniel Freund & Thodoris Lykouris, 2022. "Pricing and Optimization in Shared Vehicle Systems: An Approximation Framework," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1783-1805, May.
    15. Bharat Chandar & Ali Hortacsu & John List & Ian Muir & Jeffrey Wooldridge, 2019. "Design and Analysis of Cluster-Randomized Field Experiments in Panel Data Settings," Natural Field Experiments 00681, The Field Experiments Website.
    16. Eric Maskin & Jean Tirole, 1999. "Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 66(1), pages 83-114.
    17. Saif Benjaafar & Zicheng Wang & Xiaotang Yang, 2025. "The Impact of Automation on Workers When Workers Are Strategic: The Case of Ride-Hailing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1571-1586, September.
    18. R. G. Lipsey & Kelvin Lancaster, 1956. "The General Theory of Second Best," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 24(1), pages 11-32.
    19. Auyon Siddiq & Terry A. Taylor, 2022. "Ride-Hailing Platforms: Competition and Autonomous Vehicles," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 1511-1528, May.
    20. Anton Braverman & J. G. Dai & Xin Liu & Lei Ying, 2019. "Empty-Car Routing in Ridesharing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1437-1452, September.
    21. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    22. Martin A. Lariviere & Evan L. Porteus, 2001. "Selling to the Newsvendor: An Analysis of Price-Only Contracts," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 293-305, May.
    23. Brian Tomlin, 2003. "Capacity Investments in Supply Chains: Sharing the Gain Rather Than Sharing the Pain," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 317-333, November.
    24. Omar Besbes & Francisco Castro & Ilan Lobel, 2022. "Spatial Capacity Planning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 1271-1291, March.
    25. Pnina Feldman & Andrew E. Frazelle & Robert Swinney, 2023. "Managing Relationships Between Restaurants and Food Delivery Platforms: Conflict, Contracts, and Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 812-823, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen Lian & Garrett van Ryzin, 2025. "Capturing the Benefits of Autonomous Vehicles in Ride Hailing: The Role of Market Configuration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(7), pages 5491-5510, July.
    2. Jaelynn Oh & Chloe Kim Glaeser & Xuanming Su, 2026. "Food Ordering and Delivery: How Platforms and Restaurants Should Split the Pie," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1748-1768, March.
    3. Pfeiffer, Thomas, 2016. "A comparison of simple two-part supply chain contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 114-124.
    4. Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz & Catarina Pinto & Pedro Amorim, 2022. "Driving Supply to Marketplaces: Optimal Platform Pricing When Suppliers Share Inventory," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 2367-2386, July.
    5. Ju Myung Song & Yao Zhao, 2022. "Supply Chain Coordination for E-Commerce: Risk Penalty vs. Flat Rate," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 1110-1127, March.
    6. Saif Benjaafar & Zicheng Wang & Xiaotang Yang, 2025. "The Impact of Automation on Workers When Workers Are Strategic: The Case of Ride-Hailing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1571-1586, September.
    7. Onur Kaya & Serra Caner, 2018. "Supply chain contracts for capacity decisions under symmetric and asymmetric information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 67-92, March.
    8. Philipp Afèche & Zhe Liu & Costis Maglaras, 2023. "Ride-Hailing Networks with Strategic Drivers: The Impact of Platform Control Capabilities on Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1890-1908, September.
    9. Guangju Wang & Hailun Zhang & Jiheng Zhang, 2024. "On-Demand Ride-Matching in a Spatial Model with Abandonment and Cancellation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1278-1297, May.
    10. Junyu Cao & Wei Qi, 2023. "Stall Economy: The Value of Mobility in Retail on Wheels," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 708-726, March.
    11. Mahsa Hosseini & Joseph Milner & Gonzalo Romero, 2025. "Dynamic Relocations in Car-Sharing Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(4), pages 2010-2025, July.
    12. Martin, Layla & Minner, Stefan & Pavone, Marco & Schiffer, Maximilian, 2025. "It’s All in the Mix: Technology choice between driverless and human-driven vehicles in sharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(3), pages 969-980.
    13. De Munck, Thomas & Chevalier, Philippe & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2023. "Managing priorities on on-demand service platforms with waiting time differentiation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    14. Terry A. Taylor & Erica L. Plambeck, 2007. "Simple Relational Contracts to Motivate Capacity Investment: Price Only vs. Price and Quantity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 94-113, January.
    15. Ilan Lobel & Sébastien Martin, 2025. "Detours in Shared Rides," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1716-1736, February.
    16. Chen Jin & Kartik Hosanagar & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2026. "Welfare Impact of Bilateral Rating Display in Ride-Sharing Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 610-623, March.
    17. Arya, Anil & Löffler, Clemens & Mittendorf, Brian & Pfeiffer, Thomas, 2015. "The middleman as a panacea for supply chain coordination problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 393-400.
    18. Milena Bieniek & Tomasz Szapiro, 2024. "Supply chain coordination and decision-making under revenue sharing and cost-revenue sharing contracts with returns," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(3), pages 15-39.
    19. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2008. "Incomplete contracts, the hold-up problem, and asymmetric information," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 119-122, April.
    20. Saif Benjaafar & Ming Hu, 2020. "Operations Management in the Age of the Sharing Economy: What Is Old and What Is New?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 93-101, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:496-516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.