IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i4p2010-2028.html

Learning Personalized Product Recommendations with Customer Disengagement

Author

Listed:
  • Hamsa Bastani

    (Operations Information and Decisions, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

  • Pavithra Harsha

    (IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598)

  • Georgia Perakis

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Divya Singhvi

    (Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York 10012)

Abstract

Problem definition : We study personalized product recommendations on platforms when customers have unknown preferences. Importantly, customers may disengage when offered poor recommendations. Academic/practical relevance : Online platforms often personalize product recommendations using bandit algorithms, which balance an exploration-exploitation trade-off. However, customer disengagement—a salient feature of platforms in practice—introduces a novel challenge because exploration may cause customers to abandon the platform. We propose a novel algorithm that constrains exploration to improve performance. Methodology : We present evidence of customer disengagement using data from a major airline’s ad campaign; this motivates our model of disengagement, where a customer may abandon the platform when offered irrelevant recommendations. We formulate the customer preference learning problem as a generalized linear bandit, with the notable difference that the customer’s horizon length is a function of past recommendations. Results : We prove that no algorithm can keep all customers engaged. Unfortunately, classical bandit algorithms provably overexplore, causing every customer to eventually disengage. Motivated by the structural properties of the optimal policy in a scalar instance of our problem, we propose modifying bandit learning strategies by constraining the action space up front using an integer program. We prove that this simple modification allows our algorithm to perform well by keeping a significant fraction of customers engaged. Managerial implications : Platforms should be careful to avoid overexploration when learning customer preferences if customers have a high propensity for disengagement. Numerical experiments on movie recommendations data demonstrate that our algorithm can significantly improve customer engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamsa Bastani & Pavithra Harsha & Georgia Perakis & Divya Singhvi, 2022. "Learning Personalized Product Recommendations with Customer Disengagement," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 2010-2028, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:2010-2028
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.1047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.1047
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.1047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sam Aflaki & Ioana Popescu, 2013. "Managing Retention in Service Relationships," Post-Print hal-00960794, HAL.
    2. Hamsa Bastani, 2021. "Predicting with Proxies: Transfer Learning in High Dimension," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2964-2984, May.
    3. Hamsa Bastani & Mohsen Bayati & Khashayar Khosravi, 2021. "Mostly Exploration-Free Algorithms for Contextual Bandits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1329-1349, March.
    4. Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar, 2016. "Optimization of Recommender Systems Based on Inventory," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(4), pages 593-608, April.
    5. Vivek F. Farias & Andrew A. L, 2019. "Learning Preferences with Side Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 3131-3149, July.
    6. Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine & Lorin Hitt, 2017. "Is Tom Cruise Threatened? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Product Variety on Demand Concentration," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 643-660, September.
    7. Gavan J. Fitzsimons & Donald R. Lehmann, 2004. "Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 82-94, September.
    8. Daniel Russo & Benjamin Van Roy, 2014. "Learning to Optimize via Posterior Sampling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 1221-1243, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hangcheng Zhao & Ron Berman, 2025. "Algorithmic Collusion of Pricing and Advertising on E-commerce Platforms," Papers 2508.08325, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    2. Li, Xiaochuan & Li, Guo & Wu, Huamin & Tang, Ou, 2025. "Service portfolio design for ship-then-shop subscription in online retailing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Xin, Jie & Qin, Peng & Li, Tingting & Yang, Zhihao, 2026. "Shopping goal specificity matters: How algorithmic recommendations influence adoption intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Gad Allon & Joseph Carlstein & Yonatan Gur, 2025. "Leveraging Consensus Effect to Optimize Ranking in Online Discussion Boards," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 1701-1720, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamsa Bastani & David Simchi-Levi & Ruihao Zhu, 2022. "Meta Dynamic Pricing: Transfer Learning Across Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1865-1881, March.
    2. Ruohan Zhan & Zhimei Ren & Susan Athey & Zhengyuan Zhou, 2024. "Policy Learning with Adaptively Collected Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(8), pages 5270-5297, August.
    3. Debjit Roy & Eirini Spiliotopoulou & Jelle de Vries, 2022. "Restaurant analytics: Emerging practice and research opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3687-3709, October.
    4. Anand Kalvit & Aleksandrs Slivkins & Yonatan Gur, 2024. "Incentivized Exploration via Filtered Posterior Sampling," Papers 2402.13338, arXiv.org.
    5. Mohammad Zhalechian & Esmaeil Keyvanshokooh & Cong Shi & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2023. "Data-Driven Hospital Admission Control: A Learning Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 2111-2129, November.
    6. Esmaeil Keyvanshokooh & Mohammad Zhalechian & Cong Shi & Mark P. Van Oyen & Pooyan Kazemian, 2025. "Contextual Learning with Online Convex Optimization: Theory and Application to Medical Decision-Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(12), pages 10442-10464, December.
    7. Saeid Delshad & Amin Khademi, 2022. "Adaptive Design of Personalized Dose-Finding Clinical Trials," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 273-291, December.
    8. Darima Fotheringham & Michael A. Wiles, 2023. "The effect of implementing chatbot customer service on stock returns: an event study analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 802-822, July.
    9. Sanjith Gopalakrishnan & Moksh Matta & Mona Imanpoor Yourdshahy & Vivek Choudhary, 2023. "Go Wide or Go Deep? Assortment Strategy and Order Fulfillment in Online Retail," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 846-861, May.
    10. David Simchi-Levi & Rui Sun & Huanan Zhang, 2022. "Online Learning and Optimization for Revenue Management Problems with Add-on Discounts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7402-7421, October.
    11. Xiang, Pengcheng & Zhou, Ling & Tang, Lu, 2024. "Transfer learning via random forests: A one-shot federated approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Rong Jin & David Simchi-Levi & Li Wang & Xinshang Wang & Sen Yang, 2021. "Shrinking the Upper Confidence Bound: A Dynamic Product Selection Problem for Urban Warehouses," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4756-4771, August.
    13. Kan Xu & Hamsa Bastani, 2025. "Multitask Learning and Bandits via Robust Statistics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7752-7773, September.
    14. Nasim Mousavi & Panagiotis Adamopoulos & Jesse Bockstedt, 2023. "The Decoy Effect and Recommendation Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1533-1553, December.
    15. Caldieraro, Fabio & Cunha, Marcus, 2022. "Consumers’ response to weak unique selling propositions: Implications for optimal product recommendation strategy," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 724-744.
    16. Chaeyoung Lim & Jongchang Ahn, 2021. "Social Overload and Discontinuance Intention on Facebook: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Adel Javanmard & Jingwei Ji & Renyuan Xu, 2024. "Multi-Task Dynamic Pricing in Credit Market with Contextual Information," Papers 2410.14839, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    18. Victor F. Araman & René A. Caldentey, 2022. "Diffusion Approximations for a Class of Sequential Experimentation Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5958-5979, August.
    19. Janice Y. Jung & Barbara A. Mellers, 2016. "American attitudes toward nudges," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 62-74, January.
    20. Neetu Singh & Sandeep Kumar Singh, 2024. "A systematic literature review of solutions for cold start problem," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(7), pages 2818-2852, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:4:p:2010-2028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.