IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i3p1437-1456.html

Consumer Equilibrium, Demand Effects, and Efficiency in Group Buying

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Ming

    (School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Hong Kong)

  • Tunay I. Tunca

    (Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)

Abstract

Problem definition : We explore consumer equilibrium and efficiency in group buying events, in which the unit price for a good or service decreases with higher number of consumer sign-ups. Specifically, we study the following questions: (i) How does the dynamic consumer sign-up equilibrium evolve during these events? (ii) Is there empirical evidence that employing group buying increases demand? If so, by how much? (iii) Are there profit gains from employing this mechanism and how can they be improved? Academic/practical relevance : Group buying events are becoming increasingly popular in certain markets, especially in China. Our study contributes to better understanding of this innovative pricing mechanism and its effects on demand and profits, and can help with more effective implementation in practice. Methodology : We build a continuous-time dynamic game theoretical model to study consumer behavior and solve for its equilibrium. We then apply it to data obtained from group buying events employed by a large retailer and use structural regression methods and data clustering to estimate and evaluate demand and profit effects. Results : We demonstrate that our theoretical equilibrium is a good fit for the observed consumer behavior. We empirically show that group buying discounts are not very effective in boosting demand for very low and very high base demand levels but can significantly improve demand for intermediate levels. We estimate that employing group buying improved the retailer’s product demand and profits by 16.6% and 11.1%, respectively, and with better price and discount selections, it can improve profits by more than 30% on average. Managerial implications : Our theoretical model provides insights into dynamic consumer behavior during group buying events and can be a basis for researchers and practitioners in studying and designing these events. Our findings provide concrete support for managers on benefits of employing the mechanism, and our data-based method and analysis provide guidance for improving performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Ming & Tunay I. Tunca, 2022. "Consumer Equilibrium, Demand Effects, and Efficiency in Group Buying," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 1437-1456, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:3:p:1437-1456
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1083
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cameron,A. Colin & Trivedi,Pravin K., 2013. "Regression Analysis of Count Data," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107667273, Enero-Abr.
    2. Krishnan S. Anand & Ravi Aron, 2003. "Group Buying on the Web: A Comparison of Price-Discovery Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1546-1562, November.
    3. Hui Li & Qiaowei Shen & Yakov Bart, 2018. "Local Market Characteristics and Online-to-Offline Commerce: An Empirical Analysis of Groupon," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1860-1878, April.
    4. Bester, Helmut & Petrakis, Emmanuel, 1996. "Coupons and oligopolistic price discrimination," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 227-242.
    5. Liang, Xiaoying & Ma, Lijun & Xie, Lei & Yan, Houmin, 2014. "The informational aspect of the group-buying mechanism," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 331-340.
    6. Ming Hu & Jingchen Liu & Xin Zhai, 2021. "Intertemporal Segmentation via Flexible-Duration Group Buying," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1157-1174, September.
    7. Tunay I. Tunca & Weiming Zhu, 2018. "Buyer Intermediation in Supplier Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(12), pages 5631-5650, December.
    8. Zike Cao & Kai-Lung Hui & Hong Xu, 2018. "When Discounts Hurt Sales: The Case of Daily-Deal Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 567-591, September.
    9. R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), 1989. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    10. Xiaoqing Jing & Jinhong Xie, 2011. "Group Buying: A New Mechanism for Selling Through Social Interactions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(8), pages 1354-1372, August.
    11. Chakravarthi Narasimhan, 1984. "A Price Discrimination Theory of Coupons," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 128-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jie & Ma, Benedict Jun & Yang, Yanyi & Cheng, Chun-Hung & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2025. "Group buying with consumer disappointment at failed deals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Du, Shaofu & Sun, Xiahui & Hu, Li & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2025. "Does the quantity discount mechanism offer a loophole for retailer collusion? Impacts and responses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 999-1012.
    3. Shu, Lingli & Liang, Xuedong & Wu, Pengkun, 2026. "Values of private traffic for community group-buying platform: A game-theoretic model of subsidy strategy choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. He, Huan & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Huo, Baofeng & Zhang, Yufeng & Shi, Xiaojie, 2025. "The impact of national centralized drug procurement policy on firm performance: Evidence from Chinese pharmaceutical firms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jie & Ma, Benedict Jun & Yang, Yanyi & Cheng, Chun-Hung & Kuo, Yong-Hong, 2025. "Group buying with consumer disappointment at failed deals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Imke Reimers & Claire (Chunying) Xie, 2019. "Do Coupons Expand or Cannibalize Revenue? Evidence from an e-Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 286-300, January.
    3. Yao Tang & Xu Guan, 2022. "Seller Organization and Percentage Fee Design in the Daily Deal Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1287-1302, December.
    4. Du, Shaofu & Sun, Xiahui & Hu, Li & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2025. "Does the quantity discount mechanism offer a loophole for retailer collusion? Impacts and responses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 999-1012.
    5. Bi, Gongbing & Geng, Botao & Liu, Lindong, 2019. "On the fixed and flexible funding mechanisms in reward-based crowdfunding," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(1), pages 168-183.
    6. Amedeo Piolatto, 2015. "Online booking and information: competition and welfare consequences of review aggregators," Working Papers 2015/11, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    7. Oksana Loginova & Andrea Mantovani, 2019. "Price competition in the presence of a web aggregator," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 43-73, January.
    8. O. Loginova & A. Mantovani, 2015. "Information and Online Reviews," Working Papers wp996, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    9. Guanqun Ni, 2019. "A pricing model for group buying based on network effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Tran, Thanh & Desiraju, Ramarao, 2017. "Group-buying and channel coordination under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 68-75.
    11. Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Ho, Jyh-Wen & Lee, Chang-Lin, 2024. "Group buying in multiple channels with consideration of heterogeneous customers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    12. Sheng Li & Huifang Feng & Yu Huang, 2017. "Pricing for Products in Website-Dominant Static Group-buying," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(3), pages 94-101, September.
    13. Zhang, Guoquan & Shang, Jennifer & Yildirim, Pinar, 2016. "Optimal pricing for group buying with network effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 69-82.
    14. Shuhan Xu & Tianrui Chen, 2023. "Research on Optimal Group-Purchase Threshold and Pricing Strategy of Community Group Purchase," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Vidyanand Choudhary & Shivendu Shivendu, 2017. "Targeted Couponing in Online Auctions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 490-510, September.
    16. Ieva, M. & De Canio, F. & Ziliani, C., 2018. "Daily deal shoppers: What drives social couponing?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 299-303.
    17. Liang, Dong & Zhu, Shuyuan & Xie, Jinxing & Zhu, Wanshan & Zhao, Xiaobo, 2025. "Paying social costs to gain discounts: Is it beneficial for you?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Ming Hu & Jingchen Liu & Xin Zhai, 2021. "Intertemporal Segmentation via Flexible-Duration Group Buying," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1157-1174, September.
    19. Stole, Lars A., 2007. "Price Discrimination and Competition," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 34, pages 2221-2299, Elsevier.
    20. Gregory J. King & Xiuli Chao & Izak Duenyas, 2019. "Who Benefits When Prescription Drug Manufacturers Offer Copay Coupons?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3758-3775, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:3:p:1437-1456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.