IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v68y2022i6p4631-4644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment Strategies for Sourcing a New Technology in the Presence of a Mature Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhang

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

  • Hsiao-Hui Lee

    (Department of Management Information Systems, National Chengchi University, Wenshan District, Taipei City 11605, Taiwan (R.O.C))

Abstract

To stay competitive, high-technology manufacturers not only frequently source new technologies from their suppliers, but also financially support the development of these new technologies into component products or production tools. We consider a manufacturer that can either source a new but immature technology from a financially constrained supplier, or source a mature technology from an existing supplier if and only if the development of the new technology fails. To support the new technology, the manufacturer can choose to inject capital in the form of an equity or loan. The investment strategy not only affects the new supplier’s development effort and the probability of technical success (PTS), but also affects the existing supplier’s effort to improve the mature technology, which presents the manufacturer with a trade-off. Following the debt financing literature, we find that a loan contract is associated with a cost-shifting effect and often leads to a higher PTS. However, because the manufacturer not only maintains an investment but also a procurement relationship with the new supplier, we find a profit-sharing effect associated with an equity investment, which does not exist in the traditional equity issuance literature. In particular, we show that the profit-sharing effect can dominate the cost-shifting effect and lead to a higher PTS when the new supplier’s technological capability is sufficiently high. Nonetheless, we also show that the strategy that derives a higher PTS does not necessarily generate a higher payoff for the manufacturer. On the one hand, a loan can be preferred even when it leads to a lower PTS because the cost-shifting effect allows the manufacturer to offer a sufficiently low procurement payment while maintaining a sufficiently high PTS. On the other hand, when the existing supplier is very capable of reducing its costs, a loan can over-incentivize the new supplier to exert excessive effort and backfire.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhang & Hsiao-Hui Lee, 2022. "Investment Strategies for Sourcing a New Technology in the Presence of a Mature Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4631-4644, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:6:p:4631-4644
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4078
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Onur Boyabatlı & L. Beril Toktay, 2011. "Stochastic Capacity Investment and Flexible vs. Dedicated Technology Choice in Imperfect Capital Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2163-2179, December.
    2. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & V. Krishnan, 2009. "Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1152-1169, July.
    3. Dam, Kaniṣka & Ruiz Pérez, Daniel, 2012. "On the existence of share contracts under limited liability," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 552-555.
    4. V. Krishnan & Shantanu Bhattacharya, 2002. "Technology Selection and Commitment in New Product Development: The Role of Uncertainty and Design Flexibility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 313-327, March.
    5. Brander, James A. & Lewis, Tracy R., 1986. "Oligopoly and Financial Structure: The Limited Liability Effect," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 956-970, December.
    6. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    7. Innes, Robert D., 1990. "Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 45-67, October.
    8. Nicos Savva & Stefan Scholtes, 2014. "Opt-Out Options in New Product Co-development Partnerships," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(8), pages 1370-1386, August.
    9. Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine, 2007. "Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 192-207, February.
    10. Huaxia Rui & Guoming Lai, 2015. "Sourcing with Deferred Payment and Inspection under Supplier Product Adulteration Risk," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(6), pages 934-946, June.
    11. Jiri Chod & Jianer Zhou, 2014. "Resource Flexibility and Capital Structure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 708-729, March.
    12. S. Alex Yang & John R. Birge, 2018. "Trade Credit, Risk Sharing, and Inventory Financing Portfolios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3667-3689, August.
    13. Myers, Stewart C., 1977. "Determinants of corporate borrowing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 147-175, November.
    14. Christopher S. Tang & S. Alex Yang & Jing Wu, 2018. "Sourcing from Suppliers with Financial Constraints and Performance Risk," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 70-84, February.
    15. Onur Boyabatlı & Tiecheng Leng & L. Beril Toktay, 2016. "The Impact of Budget Constraints on Flexible vs. Dedicated Technology Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 225-244, January.
    16. Sang-Hyun Kim & Serguei Netessine, 2013. "Collaborative Cost Reduction and Component Procurement Under Information Asymmetry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 189-206, November.
    17. Volodymyr Babich & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Managing Opportunistic Supplier Product Adulteration: Deferred Payments, Inspection, and Combined Mechanisms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 301-314, April.
    18. Jiri Chod, 2017. "Inventory, Risk Shifting, and Trade Credit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3207-3225, October.
    19. Tunay I. Tunca & Weiming Zhu, 2018. "Buyer Intermediation in Supplier Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(12), pages 5631-5650, December.
    20. Panos Kouvelis & Wenhui Zhao, 2012. "Financing the Newsvendor: Supplier vs. Bank, and the Structure of Optimal Trade Credit Contracts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 566-580, June.
    21. John A. Buzacott & Rachel Q. Zhang, 2004. "Inventory Management with Asset-Based Financing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1274-1292, September.
    22. Jie Ning & Volodymyr Babich, 2018. "R&D Investments in the Presence of Knowledge Spillover and Debt Financing: Can Risk Shifting Cure Free Riding?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 97-112, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Sijing & Fu, Ke & Xu, Jiayan & Zhu, Kaijie, 2021. "The supply chain effects of trade credit under uncertain demands," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Volodymyr Babich & Panos Kouvelis, 2018. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Research at the Interface of Finance, Operations, and Risk Management (iFORM): Recent Contributions and Future Directions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. S. Alex Yang & Nitin Bakshi & Christopher J. Chen, 2021. "Trade Credit Insurance: Operational Value and Contract Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 875-891, February.
    4. Yasin Alan & Vishal Gaur, 2018. "Operational Investment and Capital Structure Under Asset-Based Lending," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 637-654, October.
    5. John R. Birge, 2015. "OM Forum—Operations and Finance Interactions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 4-15, February.
    6. Dan A. Iancu & Nikolaos Trichakis & Gerry Tsoukalas, 2017. "Is Operating Flexibility Harmful Under Debt?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1730-1761, June.
    7. Li, Yanhai & Gu, Chaocheng & Ou, Jinwen, 2020. "Supporting a financially constrained supplier under spectral risk measures: The efficiency of buyer lending," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    8. Shiming Deng & Chaocheng Gu & Gangshu (George) Cai & Yanhai Li, 2018. "Financing Multiple Heterogeneous Suppliers in Assembly Systems: Buyer Finance vs. Bank Finance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 53-69, February.
    9. Yoo, Seung Ho & Choi, Thomas Y. & Kim, DaeSoo, 2021. "Integrating sourcing and financing strategies in multi-tier supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    10. Ma, Cheng & Dai, Yuankang & Li, Zhongfei, 2022. "Financing format selection for electronic business platforms with a capital-constrained e-tailer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Ni, Jian & Chu, Lap Keung & Li, Qiang, 2017. "Capacity decisions with debt financing: The effects of agency problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1158-1169.
    12. Omar Besbes & Dan A. Iancu & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2018. "Dynamic Pricing Under Debt: Spiraling Distortions and Efficiency Losses," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4572-4589, October.
    13. S. Alex Yang & John R. Birge, 2018. "Trade Credit, Risk Sharing, and Inventory Financing Portfolios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3667-3689, August.
    14. Rath, Sambit Brata & Basu, Preetam & Mandal, Prasenjit & Paul, Samit, 2021. "Financing models for an online seller with performance risk in an E-commerce marketplace," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Fu, Ke & Wang, Ce & Xu, Jiayan, 2022. "The impact of trade credit on information sharing in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    16. Yang, Honglin & Zhuo, Wenyan & Shao, Lusheng & Talluri, Srinivas, 2021. "Mean-variance analysis of wholesale price contracts with a capital-constrained retailer: Trade credit financing vs. bank credit financing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 525-542.
    17. Volodymyr Babich & Simone Marinesi & Gerry Tsoukalas, 2021. "Does Crowdfunding Benefit Entrepreneurs and Venture Capital Investors?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 508-524, March.
    18. Jie Ning & Volodymyr Babich, 2018. "R&D Investments in the Presence of Knowledge Spillover and Debt Financing: Can Risk Shifting Cure Free Riding?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 97-112, February.
    19. Jain, Richa & Reindorp, Matthew & Chockalingam, Arun, 2023. "Buyer-backed purchase-order financing for SME supplier with uncertain yield," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 758-772.
    20. Chod, Jiri & Lyandres, Evgeny & Yang, S. Alex, 2019. "Trade credit and supplier competition," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 484-505.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:6:p:4631-4644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.