Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Linghong
- Pan, Huimin
Abstract
In the EV supply chain, R&D cooperation for key components between the manufacturer and tier 2 supplier is common. This paper primarily explores the effects of cross-echelon R&D cooperation and overconfidence on the quality and price of key components, as well as the profits of the manufacturer and suppliers. We assume that the supply chain consists of one tier 2 supplier, one tier 1 supplier, and one overconfident manufacturer. We first present the wholesale price contract as a benchmark, followed by the two-part contract and the equity contract between the tier 2 supplier and the manufacturer. Additionally, we compare above three contracts and provide numerical examples. We find that (1) the manufacturer's overconfidence level and the contract type jointly affect the quality of the key component and the profit of the tier 1 supplier. When the overconfidence level is low or the manufacturer's shareholding ratio is low, the two-part contract is more effective in improving the key component's quality and the tier 1 supplier's profit. Or else, the equity cooperation contract is more effective in improving the key component's quality and the tier 1 supplier's profit. (2) Under the equity contract, the tier 2 supplier can obtain higher profit, while the manufacturer may achieve higher overestimated expected profit under the two-part contract. (3) Under the two-part contract, the manufacturer's overconfidence increases the component's quality and the profit of the tier 1 supplier, but decreases the profit of the tier 2 supplier. In the other two contracts, the manufacturer's overconfidence leads to a decline in the key component's quality and the profits of both the tier 1 and tier 2 suppliers.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Linghong & Pan, Huimin, 2025.
"How to improve the key component's quality: the impact of overconfident manufacturer's R&D investment,"
Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000156
DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2025.100339
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:oprepe:v:14:y:2025:i:c:s2214716025000156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/operations-research-perspectives .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.