IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v68y2022i11p8449-8463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Leakage Around SEC Comment Letters

Author

Listed:
  • Marshall A. Geiger

    (Robins School of Business, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173)

  • Bret Johnson

    (School of Business, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030)

  • Keith L. Jones

    (School of Business, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045)

  • Abdullah Kumas

    (Robins School of Business, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia 23173)

Abstract

We investigate whether sophisticated investors obtain information about Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) comment letters before the public release date. Specifically, we examine mutual fund trading behavior around dates firms receive a comment letter. We find significant abnormal net selling by mutual funds immediately after a firm receives a comment letter. Additional tests find that abnormal net selling is greater when firms receive a second-round letter, where information leakage is more likely (e.g., firms with high board member connectedness and higher dedicated institutional ownership) and when comment letters address more critical issues (e.g., the need to restate prior results or related party transactions). We also find that funds with high abnormal net selling in the private phase avoid significant future share price declines. In sum, we find consistent evidence that mutual funds appear to trade on information obtained during the private phase of the SEC comment letter process.

Suggested Citation

  • Marshall A. Geiger & Bret Johnson & Keith L. Jones & Abdullah Kumas, 2022. "Information Leakage Around SEC Comment Letters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 8449-8463, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:11:p:8449-8463
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4259
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James P. Ryans, 2021. "Textual classification of SEC comment letters," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 37-80, March.
    2. Lauren Cohen & Andrea Frazzini & Christopher Malloy, 2008. "The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 951-979, October.
    3. Brian J. Bushee & Theodore H. Goodman, 2007. "Which Institutional Investors Trade Based on Private Information About Earnings and Returns?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 289-321, May.
    4. Craig W. Holden & Stacey Jacobsen, 2014. "Liquidity Measurement Problems in Fast, Competitive Markets: Expensive and Cheap Solutions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(4), pages 1747-1785, August.
    5. Veronika K. Pool & Noah Stoffman & Scott E. Yonker, 2015. "The People in Your Neighborhood: Social Interactions and Mutual Fund Portfolios," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(6), pages 2679-2732, December.
    6. Hu, Gang & Jo, Koren M. & Wang, Yi Alex & Xie, Jing, 2018. "Institutional trading and Abel Noser data," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 143-167.
    7. Paul Hribar & Nicole Jenkins & Juan Wang, 2009. "Institutional investor and accounting restatement," Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 75105-75105, December.
    8. Lee, Charles M C & Ready, Mark J, 1991. "Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(2), pages 733-746, June.
    9. Andy Puckett & Xuemin (Sterling) Yan, 2011. "The Interim Trading Skills of Institutional Investors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 66(2), pages 601-633, April.
    10. Keown, Arthur J & Pinkerton, John M, 1981. "Merger Announcements and Insider Trading Activity: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 36(4), pages 855-869, September.
    11. Shiva Rajgopal, 2021. "Integrating Practice into Accounting Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5430-5454, September.
    12. J. Michael Steele, 1989. "Models for Managing Secrets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 240-248, February.
    13. Akbas, Ferhat & Meschke, Felix & Wintoki, M. Babajide, 2016. "Director networks and informed traders," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 1-23.
    14. Bin Ke & Kathy Petroni, 2004. "How Informed Are Actively Trading Institutional Investors? Evidence from Their Trading Behavior before a Break in a String of Consecutive Earnings Increases," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 895-927, December.
    15. David Solomon & Eugene Soltes, 2015. "What Are We Meeting For? The Consequences of Private Meetings with Investors," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(2), pages 325-355.
    16. Dhaliwal, Dan S. & Lamoreaux, Phillip T. & Litov, Lubomir P. & Neyland, Jordan B., 2016. "Shared auditors in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 49-76.
    17. William Cready & Abdullah Kumas & Musa Subasi, 2014. "Are Trade Size‐Based Inferences About Traders Reliable? Evidence from Institutional Earnings‐Related Trading," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 877-909, September.
    18. Anna Agapova & Jeff Madura, 2011. "Information Leakage Prior to Company Issued Guidance," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 40(3), pages 623-646, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marshall A. Geiger & Sami Keskek & Abdullah Kumas, 2022. "Trading concentration and industry-specific information: an analysis of auto complaints," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 913-937, October.
    2. Ole‐Kristian Hope & Pingui Rao & Yanping Xu & Heng Yue, 2023. "Information sharing between mutual funds and auditors," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 152-197, January.
    3. Hu, Gang & Jo, Koren M. & Wang, Yi Alex & Xie, Jing, 2018. "Institutional trading and Abel Noser data," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 143-167.
    4. Jiao, Yawen, 2022. "Decision-based trades: An analysis of institutional investors’ information advantages," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 104-115.
    5. Lin, Shu & Tian, Shu & Zheng, Lu, 2022. "Friend or foe: On a common shareholder relationship between mutual funds and public companies," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    6. Bogousslavsky, Vincent & Collin-Dufresne, Pierre & Sağlam, Mehmet, 2021. "Slow-moving capital and execution costs: Evidence from a major trading glitch," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 922-949.
    7. Shih-Chuan Tsai, 2014. "Individuals’ Trading Prior to Earnings Announcements," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9-10), pages 1124-1156, November.
    8. Eisele, Alexander & Nefedova, Tamara & Parise, Gianpaolo & Peijnenburg, Kim, 2020. "Trading out of sight: An analysis of cross-trading in mutual fund families," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 359-378.
    9. Cahill, Daniel & Ho, Choy Yeing (Chloe) & Yang, Joey W., 2022. "The COVID-19 pandemic: How important is face-to-face interaction for information dissemination?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    11. Wang, Anxing & Zhou, Jimei & Chen, Tao, 2011. "Which institutions matter to short-term market efficiency in Japan?," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 164-179, September.
    12. Jaspersen, Stefan & Limbach, Peter, 2020. "Screening Discrimination in Financial Markets: Evidence from CEO-Fund Manager Dyads," CFR Working Papers 17-02, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR), revised 2020.
    13. Kristian D. Allee & Brian J. Bushee & Tyler J. Kleppe & Andrew T. Pierce, 2022. "Did the Siebel Systems Case Limit the SEC's Ability to Enforce Regulation Fair Disclosure?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 1235-1291, September.
    14. Mingfa Ding & Birger Nilsson & Sandy Suardi, 2017. "Foreign Institutional Investment, Ownership, and Liquidity: Real and Informational Frictions," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 101-144, February.
    15. Ding, Mingfa & Nilsson, Birger & Suardi, Sandy, 2013. "Foreign Institutional Investors and Stock Market Liquidity in China: State Ownership, Trading Activity and Information Asymmetry," Knut Wicksell Working Paper Series 2013/14, Lund University, Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies.
    16. Huang, Yin-Siang & Bui, Dien Giau & Lin, Chih-Yung & Robin,, 2022. "The effect of abnormal institutional attention on bank loans," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    17. Akbas, Ferhat & Meschke, Felix & Wintoki, M. Babajide, 2016. "Director networks and informed traders," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 1-23.
    18. Yangyang Chen & Jun Huang & Ting Li & Jeffrey Pittman, 2022. "It's a Small World: The Importance of Social Connections with Auditors to Mutual Fund Managers’ Portfolio Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 901-963, June.
    19. Hoang Luong Luong & Huong Giang (Lily) Nguyen & Xiangkang Yin, 2015. "When Is a Firm's Information Asymmetry Priced? The Role of Institutional Investors," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 15(1), pages 55-88, March.
    20. Farrell, Michael & Green, T. Clifton & Jame, Russell & Markov, Stanimir, 2022. "The democratization of investment research and the informativeness of retail investor trading," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 616-641.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:11:p:8449-8463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.