IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/chf/rpseri/rp1319.html

Trading Out of Sight: An Analysis of Cross-Trading in Mutual Fund Families

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Eisele

    (University of Lugano)

  • Tamara Nefedova

    (Université Paris-Dauphine)

  • Gianpaolo Parise

    (EDHEC)

  • Kim Peijnenburg

    (Netspar; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); EDHEC Business School - Department of Economics & Finance)

Abstract

This paper explores the incentives for mutual funds to trade with sibling funds affiliated with the same group. To this end, we construct a dataset of almost one million equity transactions and compare the pricing of trades crossed internally (cross-trades) with that of twin trades executed with external counterparties. We find that cross-trades are used either to opportunistically reallocate performance among trading funds or to reduce transaction costs for both counterparties. The prevalent incentive depends on the intensity of internal monitoring and the market state. We discuss the implications for the literature on fund performance and the current regulatory debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Eisele & Tamara Nefedova & Gianpaolo Parise & Kim Peijnenburg, 2013. "Trading Out of Sight: An Analysis of Cross-Trading in Mutual Fund Families," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 13-19, Swiss Finance Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2023976
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bagattini, Giulio & Fecht, Falko & Maddaloni, Angela, 2023. "Liquidity support and distress resilience in bank-affiliated mutual funds," SAFE Working Paper Series 385, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    3. Adams, John & Hayunga, Darren & Mansi, Sattar, 2022. "Index fund trading costs are inversely related to fund and family size," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Jannic Cutura & Gianpaolo Parise & Andreas Schrimpf, 2025. "Debt Derisking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 615-634, January.
    5. Saengchote, Kanis & Sthienchoak, Jananya, 2020. "Strategic participation in IPOs by affiliated mutual funds: Thai evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    6. Wang, Z. Jay & Yang, Jingyun, 2021. "Cross-trading and liquidity management: Evidence from municipal bond funds," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Nefedova, Tamara & Pratobevera, Giuseppe, 2020. "Do institutional investors play hide-and-sell in the IPO aftermarket?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Hu, Gang & Jo, Koren M. & Wang, Yi Alex & Xie, Jing, 2018. "Institutional trading and Abel Noser data," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 143-167.
    9. Goncalves-Pinto, Luis & Sotes-Paladino, Juan & Xu, Jing, 2018. "The invisible hand of internal markets in mutual fund families," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 105-124.
    10. Pratobevera, Giuseppe, 2024. "Bank-affiliated institutional investors and IPO syndicates formation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Fröberg, Emelie & Halling, Michael, 2024. "Do investors benefit from MiFID II unbundling?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    12. Kräussl, Roman & Rinne, Kalle & Sunc, Huizhu, 2023. "Does family matter? Venture capital cross-fund cash flows," CFS Working Paper Series 695, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp1319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ridima Mittal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fameech.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.