IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Incorporating Thresholds of Indifference in Probabilistic Choice Models

Listed author(s):
  • K. S. Krishnan

    (General Motors Corporation, Warren, Michigan)

Registered author(s):

    Probabilistic choice models are often based on utility concepts which call for assessments by decision makers of available alternatives. These models assume that distinct utilities can be derived from the decision maker's expressed preferences. Such an assumption is generally valid if the decision maker can recognize arbitrarily small utility differences. If the decision maker is indifferent between the alternatives the corresponding utilities are expected to be similar. In this paper, the concept of minimum perceivable difference is introduced into the conventional binary logit model. It is postulated that two alternatives are perceived as different only if the absolute difference in their utilities exceeds a positive constant. For estimating the parameters of the new model a maximum likelihood technique is employed, and an empirical test of the model is conducted using data on travelers' choice of mode for accessing commuter rail service from Lindenwold (New Jersey) to downtown Philadelphia. The model predicts individuals' choices in a holdout sample significantly better than the conventional logit model.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by INFORMS in its journal Management Science.

    Volume (Year): 23 (1977)
    Issue (Month): 11 (July)
    Pages: 1224-1233

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:23:y:1977:i:11:p:1224-1233
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    7240 Parkway Drive, Suite 300, Hanover, MD 21076 USA

    Phone: +1-443-757-3500
    Fax: 443-757-3515
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:23:y:1977:i:11:p:1224-1233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.