IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v12y2001i2p155-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters

Author

Listed:
  • France Belanger

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 3007 Pamplin Hall, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0101)

  • Rosann Webb Collins

    (University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, Florida 33620)

  • Paul H. Cheney

    (University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard, Orlando, Florida 32816-1400)

Abstract

As organizations implement more and more distributed work arrangements such as telecommuting, there is a need to understand the determinants of success of this new work setting. This research investigated three variables believed to impact outcomes in telecommuting: the availability of information system technology, the availability of communication technologies, and the communication patterns of telecommuters within their work groups. Two perspectives are used in this study. The direct effects of these three variables on perceived productivity, performance, and satisfaction were tested. A second perspective, based on the concept of fit and contingency theory, posits that successful telecommuting outcomes, measured by perceived productivity, performance, and satisfaction, are predicted by interactions between these independent variables. The study was conducted by surveying multiple respondents from different organizations who were members of work groups in which some or all employees were telecommuters. The results indicate that technology variables positively impact productivity, performance, and satisfaction of telecommuters, while the interaction between the technology variables is significant in predicting perceived productivity. Work group communication, as measured by the centrality of individuals, negatively affects perceived productivity and performance. The paper presents a discussion of the theoretical significance of these findings, and offers recommendations for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • France Belanger & Rosann Webb Collins & Paul H. Cheney, 2001. "Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 155-176, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:12:y:2001:i:2:p:155-176
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.12.2.155.9695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.155.9695
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.12.2.155.9695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellen M. Hufnagel & Christopher Conca, 1994. "User Response Data: The Potential for Errors and Biases," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 48-73, March.
    2. Janet Fulk & Gerardine DeSanctis, 1995. "Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 337-349, August.
    3. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    4. Gerardine DeSanctis & Peter Monge, 1999. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 693-703, December.
    5. Alladi Venkatesh & Nicholas P. Vitalari, 1992. "An Emerging Distributed Work Arrangement: An Investigation of Computer-Based Supplemental Work at Home," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(12), pages 1687-1706, December.
    6. Richard Z. Gooding & Angelo J. Kinicki, 1995. "Interpreting Event Causes: The Complementary Role Of Categorization And Attribution Processes," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Pamela Hinds & Sara Kiesler, 1995. "Communication across Boundaries: Work, Structure, and Use of Communication Technologies in a Large Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 373-393, August.
    8. Iris Vessey & Dennis Galletta, 1991. "Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 63-84, March.
    9. Linda Elizabeth Duxbury & Christopher Alan Higgins & Shirley Mills, 1992. "After-Hours Telecommuting and Work-Family Conflict: A Comparative Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 173-190, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geon-Cheol Shin & Yaokun Ma, 2008. "Factors affecting trust between Korean IT firms and their Chinese counterparts," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 321-334.
    2. Pham Quang Huy & Vo Van Nhi & Pham Tra Lam, 2019. "The Interaction Effect of Task – Technology Fit and Job Satisfaction on Job Performance in ERP Context: Case Study of Vietnamese Enterprises," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 7(1), pages 48-61.
    3. Christoph Weinert & Tim Weitzel, 2023. "Teleworking in the Covid-19 Pandemic," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(3), pages 309-328, June.
    4. Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Tim Weitzel, 2022. "A Dark Side of Telework: A Social Comparison-Based Study from the Perspective of Office Workers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 793-811, December.
    5. Akash Sinha & Prabhat Kumar & Nripendra P. Rana & Rubina Islam & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2019. "Impact of internet of things (IoT) in disaster management: a task-technology fit perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 759-794, December.
    6. Derrick J. Neufeld & Zeying Wan & Yulin Fang, 2010. "Remote Leadership, Communication Effectiveness and Leader Performance," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 227-246, May.
    7. Hung-pin Shih & Kee-hung Lai & T. C. E. Cheng, 2015. "Examining structural, perceptual, and attitudinal influences on the quality of information sharing in collaborative technology use," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 455-470, April.
    8. Alina Filip & Alin Stancu & Mihai Mehedințu & Adrian Streinu-Cercel & Alexandrina Maria Pauceanu, 2022. "Particularities of Telework Applicable to the Health System in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pamela J. Hinds & Diane E. Bailey, 2003. "Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(6), pages 615-632, December.
    2. Ujwal Kayande & Arnaud De Bruyn & Gary L. Lilien & Arvind Rangaswamy & Gerrit H. van Bruggen, 2009. "How Incorporating Feedback Mechanisms in a DSS Affects DSS Evaluations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 527-546, December.
    3. Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Mathias Willnat & Henrik Lechte & Maike Greve & Julia Heinsohn & Alfred Benedikt Brendel, 2021. "Mobility Need-Adaptive Housing Platforms: The Benefit of a Commute Time Search Feature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Geon-Cheol Shin & Yaokun Ma, 2008. "Factors affecting trust between Korean IT firms and their Chinese counterparts," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 321-334.
    5. Chenzhang Bao & Indranil R. Bardhan, 2022. "Performance of Accountable Care Organizations: Health Information Technology and Quality–Efficiency Trade-Offs," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 697-717, June.
    6. Stephan Aier & Tobias Bucher & Robert Winter, 2011. "Critical Success Factors of Service Orientation in Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(2), pages 77-88, April.
    7. Alain Pinsonneault & Kenneth L. Kraemer, 2002. "Exploring the Role of Information Technology in Organizational Downsizing: A Tale of Two American Cities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 191-208, April.
    8. Gudigantala, Naveen & Song, Jaeki & Jones, Donald, 2011. "User satisfaction with Web-based DSS: The role of cognitive antecedents," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 327-338.
    9. Samer Faraj & Georg von Krogh & Eric Monteiro & Karim R. Lakhani, 2016. "Special Section Introduction—Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 668-684, December.
    10. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    12. M. Suresh & Kavya Gopakumar, 2021. "Multi-grade fuzzy assessment framework for software professionals in work-from-home mode during and post-COVID-19 era," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    14. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    15. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    16. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    17. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    18. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.
    19. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    20. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:12:y:2001:i:2:p:155-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.