IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejn/ejefjr/v7y2019i1p48-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interaction Effect of Task – Technology Fit and Job Satisfaction on Job Performance in ERP Context: Case Study of Vietnamese Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Pham Quang Huy

    (University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Vo Van Nhi

    (University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Pham Tra Lam

    (University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Abstract

Job performance and technology in work have been researched with a number of global issues. The effect may have different levels in countries with the rapidly development in technology. It is important to know the impact with moderator value of job satisfaction to this relationship conducted by many previous papers. The main aim of this study was to examine the role of job satisfaction in the relationship between individual job performance and task – technology fit in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) environment. The study was test and examined by 225 individuals in the Vietnamese enterprises. The results of the study provided additional bases for assessing the success of ERP system to researchers, businesses, and suppliers. In addition, final figures of the PLS analysis revealed that task – technology fit was significantly and positively related to job satisfaction and individual job performance in ERP environment. Furthermore, job satisfaction had an effect on individual job performance in ERP context.

Suggested Citation

  • Pham Quang Huy & Vo Van Nhi & Pham Tra Lam, 2019. "The Interaction Effect of Task – Technology Fit and Job Satisfaction on Job Performance in ERP Context: Case Study of Vietnamese Enterprises," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 7(1), pages 48-61.
    • Handle: RePEc:ejn:ejefjr:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:48-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/EJEF-7.1.4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. France Belanger & Rosann Webb Collins & Paul H. Cheney, 2001. "Technology Requirements and Work Group Communication for Telecommuters," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 155-176, June.
    2. Thomas W. Ferratt & Ritu Agarwal & Carol V. Brown & Jo Ellen Moore, 2005. "IT Human Resource Management Configurations and IT Turnover: Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 237-255, September.
    3. Dale Goodhue & Russell Littlefield & Detmar W. Straub, 1997. "The measurement of the impacts of the IIC on the end‐users: The survey," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 48(5), pages 454-465, May.
    4. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    5. Olga Volkoff & Diane M. Strong & Michael B. Elmes, 2007. "Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 832-848, October.
    6. Dale L. Goodhue, 1995. "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(12), pages 1827-1844, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Desi Tri Kurniawati & M Abdi Dzil Ikhram W & Pusvita Yuana, 2021. "The mediating role of task-technology fit (TTF) in the effect of knowledge sharing intention on job satisfaction and employee performance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 93-100, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    2. Jackie London & Siyuan Li & Heshan Sun, 2022. "Seems Legit: An Investigation of the Assessing and Sharing of Unverifiable Messages on Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 978-1001, September.
    3. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    4. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Rana, Omer F. & Ranjan, Rajiv & Morgan, Graham, 2022. "“Alexa, let’s talk about my productivity”: The impact of digital assistants on work productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 572-584.
    5. Akash Sinha & Prabhat Kumar & Nripendra P. Rana & Rubina Islam & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2019. "Impact of internet of things (IoT) in disaster management: a task-technology fit perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 759-794, December.
    6. Melchor-Ferrer, Elias & Buendía-Carrillo, Dionisio, 2014. "Financial information management for university departments, using open-source software," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 191-199.
    7. Henri Barki & Ryad Titah & Céline Boffo, 2007. "Information System Use--Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 173-192, June.
    8. Torkzadeh, G. & Doll, W. J., 1999. "The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 327-339, June.
    9. Andreas I. Nicolaou & D. Harrison McKnight, 2006. "Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 332-351, December.
    10. Martin S. Schilling & Nadine Oeser & Cornelius Schaub, 2007. "How Effective Are Decision Analyses? Assessing Decision Process and Group Alignment Effects," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 227-242, December.
    11. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    12. Smith, Carlo D. & Mentzer, John T., 2010. "Forecasting task-technology fit: The influence of individuals, systems and procedures on forecast performance," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 144-161, January.
    13. Stefan Seebacher & Ronny Schüritz & Gerhard Satzger, 2021. "Towards an understanding of technology fit and appropriation in business networks: evidence from blockchain implementations," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 183-204, March.
    14. Gianina MIHAI, 2017. "End Users and ERP Systems’ Success. Three Models," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 491-506.
    15. Hou, Chung-Kuang, 2012. "Examining the effect of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with business intelligence systems: An empirical study of Taiwan's electronics industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 560-573.
    16. Nathalie Demoulin & Kristof Coussement, 2018. "Acceptance of text-mining systems: The signaling role of information quality," Post-Print hal-02111772, HAL.
    17. Kuo-Yu Huang & Yea-Ru Chuang, 2016. "A task–technology fit view of job search website impact on performance effects: An empirical analysis from Taiwan," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1253943-125, December.
    18. Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh & Samsilah Roslan & Zulkifli Mohamad & Ismi Arif Ismail & Habibah Ab Jalil & Seyedali Ahrari, 2022. "Influencing Factors in MOOCs Adoption in Higher Education: A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejn:ejefjr:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:48-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Esra Barakli (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.