IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v54y2024i2p162-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Optimization Case Study in Analyzing Missouri Redistricting

Author

Listed:
  • Kiera W. Dobbs

    (Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

  • Rahul Swamy

    (Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

  • Douglas M. King

    (Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

  • Ian G. Ludden

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

  • Sheldon H. Jacobson

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801)

Abstract

Every 10 years, U.S. states redraw their congressional and state legislative district plans. This process decides the political landscape for the subsequent 10 years. Prior to the 2021 redistricting cycle, Missouri enacted new criteria for state legislative districts. The Missouri League of Women Voters (LWV-MO) contacted the authors to analyze the potential impact of these new criteria on the map-drawing process. We apply recombination (a spanning tree method) within a local search optimization framework to analyze the interplay between political geography, constitutional requirements, and political fairness in Missouri. We use this framework to produce district plans that satisfy the new criteria and prioritize different aspects of fairness. The results, quantified by several measures of fairness, reveal an inherent Republican advantage in Missouri because of the state’s political geography and constitutional requirements. We conclude that Missouri’s political geography and constitutional requirements prevent the optimization framework from substantially improving political fairness in state legislative plans. In contrast, the framework can substantially improve political fairness in Missouri congressional plans, which are not subject to the new requirements. The LWV-MO used this work to advocate for fairness and transparency in their testimonies for the Missouri redistricting commission’s public hearings.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiera W. Dobbs & Rahul Swamy & Douglas M. King & Ian G. Ludden & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2024. "An Optimization Case Study in Analyzing Missouri Redistricting," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 162-187, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:54:y:2024:i:2:p:162-187
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2022.0037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2022.0037
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2022.0037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:54:y:2024:i:2:p:162-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.