IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v305y2021i1d10.1007_s10479-021-04227-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematical political districting taking care of minority groups

Author

Listed:
  • Verónica Arredondo

    (Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas)

  • Miguel Martínez-Panero

    (Universidad de Valladolid)

  • Teresa Peña

    (Universidad de Valladolid)

  • Federica Ricca

    (Università di Roma, La Sapienza)

Abstract

Political districting (PD) is a wide studied topic in the literature since the 60s. It typically requires a multi-criteria approach, and mathematical programs are frequently suggested to model the many aspects of this difficult problem. This implies that exact models cannot be solved to optimality when the size of the territory is too large. In spite of this, an exact formulation can also be exploited in a heuristic framework to find at least a sub-optimal solution for large size problem instances. We study the design of electoral districts in Mexico, where the population is characterized by the presence of minority groups (“indigenous community”) who have a special right to be represented in the Parliament. For this, the Mexican electoral law prescribes that a fixed number of districts must be designed to support the representation of the indigenous community. We formulate mixed integer linear programs (MILP) following these two principles, but also including the basic PD criteria of contiguity and population balance. The district map is obtained in two stages: first we produce the fixed number of indigenous districts established by the Law; then we complete the district map by forming the non-indigenous districts. This two-phase approach has two advantages: a dedicated objective function can be formulated in Phase 1 to form indigenous districts at best; in the second phase the instance size is reduced (both in the number of territorial units and in the number of districts) so that the computational effort to solve the problem is reduced as well. We test our procedure on the territory of Chiapas in Mexico and on some fictitious problem instances in which the territory is represented by a grid graph. We also compare our district map with the Institutional one currently adopted in Chiapas.

Suggested Citation

  • Verónica Arredondo & Miguel Martínez-Panero & Teresa Peña & Federica Ricca, 2021. "Mathematical political districting taking care of minority groups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 375-402, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:305:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04227-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04227-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04227-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04227-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George, John A. & Lamar, Bruce W. & Wallace, Chris A., 1997. "Political district determination using large-scale network optimization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 11-28, March.
    2. Ricca, Federica & Simeone, Bruno, 2008. "Local search algorithms for political districting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1409-1426, September.
    3. Justin C. Williams, 1995. "Political Redistricting: A Review," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 13-40, January.
    4. Juan Carlos Duque & Raúl Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2007. "Supervised Regionalization Methods: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 195-220, July.
    5. Taylor, Peter J., 1973. "A New Shape Measure for Evaluating Electoral District Patterns," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(3), pages 947-950, September.
    6. S. W. Hess & J. B. Weaver & H. J. Siegfeldt & J. N. Whelan & P. A. Zitlau, 1965. "Nonpartisan Political Redistricting by Computer," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 998-1006, December.
    7. Cameron, Charles & Epstein, David & O'Halloran, Sharyn, 1996. "Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 90(4), pages 794-812, December.
    8. Ríos-Mercado, Roger Z. & López-Pérez, J. Fabián, 2013. "Commercial territory design planning with realignment and disjoint assignment requirements," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 525-535.
    9. Federica Ricca & Andrea Scozzari & Bruno Simeone, 2013. "Political Districting: from classical models to recent approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 271-299, April.
    10. Federica Ricca & Andrea Scozzari, 2020. "Mathematical Programming Formulations for Practical Political Districting," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado (ed.), Optimal Districting and Territory Design, chapter 0, pages 105-128, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno, Giuseppe & Genovese, Andrea & Piccolo, Carmela, 2017. "Territorial amalgamation decisions in local government: Models and a case study from Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 61-72.
    2. Eduardo Álvarez-Miranda & Camilo Campos-Valdés & Maurcio Morales Quiroga & Matías Moreno-Faguett & Jordi Pereira, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Pen for Drawing Fair Districts: When Democratic and Demographic Fairness Matter," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Federica Ricca & Andrea Scozzari & Bruno Simeone, 2013. "Political Districting: from classical models to recent approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 204(1), pages 271-299, April.
    4. Sebastián Moreno & Jordi Pereira & Wilfredo Yushimito, 2020. "A hybrid K-means and integer programming method for commercial territory design: a case study in meat distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 87-117, March.
    5. Baghersad, Milad & Emadikhiav, Mohsen & Huang, C. Derrick & Behara, Ravi S., 2023. "Modularity maximization to design contiguous policy zones for pandemic response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 99-112.
    6. Alexander Butsch & Jörg Kalcsics & Gilbert Laporte, 2014. "Districting for Arc Routing," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 809-824, November.
    7. Djordje Dugošija & Aleksandar Savić & Zoran Maksimović, 2020. "A new integer linear programming formulation for the problem of political districting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 247-263, May.
    8. Christian Haas & Lee Hachadoorian & Steven O Kimbrough & Peter Miller & Frederic Murphy, 2020. "Seed-Fill-Shift-Repair: A redistricting heuristic for civic deliberation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, September.
    9. Antonio Diglio & Stefan Nickel & Francisco Saldanha-da-Gama, 2020. "Towards a stochastic programming modeling framework for districting," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 249-285, September.
    10. Anderson Kenji Hirose & Cassius Tadeu Scarpin & José Eduardo Pécora Junior, 2020. "Goal programming approach for political districting in Santa Catarina State: Brazil," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 209-232, April.
    11. Hyun Kim & Yongwan Chun & Kamyoung Kim, 2015. "Delimitation of Functional Regions Using a p-Regions Problem Approach," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 38(3), pages 235-263, July.
    12. Brian Lunday & Hanif Sherali & Kevin Lunday, 2012. "The coastal seaspace patrol sector design and allocation problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 483-514, November.
    13. Jörg Kalcsics & Stefan Nickel & Michael Schröder, 2005. "Towards a unified territorial design approach — Applications, algorithms and GIS integration," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 13(1), pages 1-56, June.
    14. F Caro & T Shirabe & M Guignard & A Weintraub, 2004. "School redistricting: embedding GIS tools with integer programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(8), pages 836-849, August.
    15. Balázs Fleiner & Balázs Nagy & Attila Tasnádi, 2017. "Optimal partisan districting on planar geographies," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 25(4), pages 879-888, December.
    16. Yin Xia & Dianfeng Liu & Yaolin Liu & Jianhua He & Xiaofeng Hong, 2014. "Alternative Zoning Scenarios for Regional Sustainable Land Use Controls in China: A Knowledge-Based Multiobjective Optimisation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Juan Carlos Duque & Raúl Ramos & Jordi Suriñach, 2007. "Supervised Regionalization Methods: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 195-220, July.
    18. Sommer Gentry & Eric Chow & Allan Massie & Dorry Segev, 2015. "Gerrymandering for Justice: Redistricting U.S. Liver Allocation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 462-480, October.
    19. Yanık, Seda & Sürer, Özge & Öztayşi, Başar, 2016. "Designing sustainable energy regions using genetic algorithms and location-allocation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 161-172.
    20. Diglio, Antonio & Peiró, Juanjo & Piccolo, Carmela & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Solutions for districting problems with chance-constrained balancing requirements," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:305:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04227-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.