IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jabim0/v15y2024i1p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Old to New Ways of Working: How Technology and Autonomy Drive Productivity in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Jefta Harlianto

    (Management Department, BINUS Business School, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Harjanto Prabowo

    (Management Department, BINUS Business School, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Rano Kartono Rahim

    (Management Department, BINUS Business School, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Nugroho J. Setiadi

    (Management Department, BINUS Business School, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

Startups frequently encounter growth challenges, with a survival rate of only about 10%, and Indonesian startups face additional obstacles, including significant layoffs in key sectors. In this study, the author examined the relationship between workplace technology (WT), job autonomy (JA), new ways of working (NWW), and employee productivity (EP) in Indonesian unicorn startups in the postpandemic era. Using survey data from 413 employees and analyzed through covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) with LISREL software, the author tested the hypotheses and found out that WT and JA significantly foster NWW and enhance EP. These findings highlight the critical role of WT and JA in shaping the modern work environment and enhancing productivity, particularly in the context of startups navigating the complexities of a postpandemic landscape to support sustainable growth and competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Jefta Harlianto & Harjanto Prabowo & Rano Kartono Rahim & Nugroho J. Setiadi, 2024. "From Old to New Ways of Working: How Technology and Autonomy Drive Productivity in Indonesia," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jabim0:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:1-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJABIM.356503
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lichtenstein, Donald R & Bearden, William O, 1989. "Contextual Influences on Perceptions of Merchant-Supplied Reference Prices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 55-66, June.
    2. Mitchell, V. -W., 2001. "Re-conceptualizing consumer store image processing using perceived risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 167-172, November.
    3. Sunita Guru & Jitendra Nenavani & Vipul Patel & Nityesh Bhatt, 2020. "Ranking of perceived risks in online shopping," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(2), pages 137-152, June.
    4. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Angowski & Tomasz Kijek & Marcin Lipowski & Ilona Bondos, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Photovoltaic Systems in Rural Areas of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Rosillo-Díaz, Elena & Muñoz-Rosas, Juan Francisco & Blanco-Encomienda, Francisco Javier, 2024. "Impact of heuristic–systematic cues on the purchase intention of the electronic commerce consumer through the perception of product quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Simonson, Itamar & Drolet, Aimee L., 2003. "Anchoring Effects on Consumers' Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept," Research Papers 1787, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. Goebel, Daniel J. & Marshall, Greg W. & Locander, William B., 2006. "Getting one's own way: An investigation of influence attempts by marketers on nonmarketing members of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 829-837, July.
    5. Daniel F. Garrett, 2019. "Fake Sales: A Dynamic Pricing Perspective," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 375-382, September.
    6. Sunita Guru & Jitendra Nenavani & Vipul Patel & Nityesh Bhatt, 2020. "Ranking of perceived risks in online shopping," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(2), pages 137-152, June.
    7. Fennell, Patrick B. & Coleman, Joshua T. & Kuo, Andrew, 2020. "The moderating role of donation quantifiers on price fairness judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 464-473.
    8. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.
    9. Diallo, Mbaye Fall, 2012. "Effects of store image and store brand price-image on store brand purchase intention: Application to an emerging market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 360-367.
    10. Farzaneh Soleimani Zoghi, "undated". "An Empirical Study On The Impact Of Risk Perception On German Consumers Online Buying Intention," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 201935, Reviewsep.
    11. Fabrice Larceneux & Thomas Lefebvre, 2016. "The " Bad Deal " Illusion," Post-Print halshs-01671084, HAL.
    12. Lee, Jaedeock & Ferreira, Mauricio, 2013. "A role of team and organizational identification in the success of cause-related sport marketing," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 161-172.
    13. Perea ý Monsuwé, A., 2003. "Rationalizability and minimal complexity in dynamic games," Research Memorandum 030, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    14. Kuppelwieser, Volker G. & Klaus, Phil & Manthiou, Aikaterini & Boujena, Othman, 2019. "Consumer responses to planned obsolescence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 157-165.
    15. Pappas, Nikolaos & Papatheodorou, Andreas, 2017. "Tourism and the refugee crisis in Greece: Perceptions and decision-making of accommodation providers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 31-41.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4234 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Wang, Jianming & Li, Yongqiang & He, Zhengxia & Gao, Jian & Wang, Jianguo, 2022. "Scale framing, benefit framing and their interaction effects on energy-saving behaviors: Evidence from urban residents of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Khooban, Zohreh & Mutlu, Nevin & Kok, Ton de, 2025. "Logistics service sharing in cross-border e-commerce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    19. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    20. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2005-057 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Hsin‐Hui Lin & Pin‐Han Chen & Chih‐Lun Wu, 2023. "Exploring the price anchoring effect in mobile commerce: An experimental study," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 1601-1623, April.
    22. Luo, Hong & Park, Seong-Yeon, 2024. "Exploring barriers to secondhand luxury consumption among Chinese consumers and changes during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jabim0:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.