IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijcist/v11y2015i1p62-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context-independent centrality measures underestimate the vulnerability of power grids

Author

Listed:
  • Trivik Verma
  • Wendy Ellens
  • Robert E. Kooij

Abstract

Power grids vulnerability is a key issue in society. A component failure may trigger cascades of failures across the grid and lead to a large blackout. Within complex network analysis, structural vulnerabilities of power grids have been studied mostly using purely topological approaches, which assumes that flow of power is dictated by shortest paths. However, this fails to capture the real flow characteristics of power grids. We have proposed a flow redistribution mechanism that closely mimics the flow in power grids using the power transfer distribution factor (PTDF). We apply the model to the European high-voltage grid to carry out a comparative study for a number of centrality measures. 'Centrality' gives an indication of the criticality of network components. We also show a brief comparison of the end results with other power grid systems to generalise the result.

Suggested Citation

  • Trivik Verma & Wendy Ellens & Robert E. Kooij, 2015. "Context-independent centrality measures underestimate the vulnerability of power grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 62-81.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:11:y:2015:i:1:p:62-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=67398
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Kinney & P. Crucitti & R. Albert & V. Latora, 2005. "Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 101-107, July.
    2. Bompard, Ettore & Napoli, Roberto & Xue, Fei, 2009. "Analysis of structural vulnerabilities in power transmission grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 5-12.
    3. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marashi, Koosha & Sarvestani, Sahra Sedigh & Hurson, Ali R., 2021. "Identification of interdependencies and prediction of fault propagation for cyber–physical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Psaltoglou, Artemis & Calle, Eusebi, 2018. "Enhanced connectivity index – A new measure for identifying critical points in urban public transportation networks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 22-32.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucas Cuadra & Sancho Salcedo-Sanz & Javier Del Ser & Silvia Jiménez-Fernández & Zong Woo Geem, 2015. "A Critical Review of Robustness in Power Grids Using Complex Networks Concepts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-55, August.
    2. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    3. Pagani, Giuliano Andrea & Aiello, Marco, 2013. "The Power Grid as a complex network: A survey," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(11), pages 2688-2700.
    4. Juan Eberhard & Jaime F. Lavin & Alejandro Montecinos-Pearce, 2017. "A Network-Based Dynamic Analysis in an Equity Stock Market," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-16, November.
    5. Cumelles, Joel & Lordan, Oriol & Sallan, Jose M., 2021. "Cascading failures in airport networks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Hasan, Samiul & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2011. "A threshold model of social contagion process for evacuation decision making," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1590-1605.
    7. Kyu-Min Lee & Jae-Suk Yang & Gunn Kim & Jaesung Lee & Kwang-Il Goh & In-mook Kim, 2011. "Impact of the Topology of Global Macroeconomic Network on the Spreading of Economic Crises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, March.
    8. Koç, Yakup & Warnier, Martijn & Mieghem, Piet Van & Kooij, Robert E. & Brazier, Frances M.T., 2014. "The impact of the topology on cascading failures in a power grid model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 402(C), pages 169-179.
    9. Ma, Xiangyu & Zhou, Huijie & Li, Zhiyi, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A complex network perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Liu, Honglu & Tian, Zhihong & Huang, Anqiang & Yang, Zaili, 2018. "Analysis of vulnerabilities in maritime supply chains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 475-484.
    11. Olabode Amusan & Shuomang Shi & Di Wu & Haitao Liao, 2023. "Structural Vulnerability Analysis of Interdependent Electric Power and Natural Gas Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Giuliano Andrea Pagani & Marco Aiello, 2015. "A complex network approach for identifying vulnerabilities of the medium and low voltage grid," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 36-61.
    13. Sohn, Insoo, 2019. "A robust complex network generation method based on neural networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 593-601.
    14. Guo, Hengdao & Zheng, Ciyan & Iu, Herbert Ho-Ching & Fernando, Tyrone, 2017. "A critical review of cascading failure analysis and modeling of power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 9-22.
    15. H Jönsson & J Johansson & H Johansson, 2008. "Identifying critical components in technical infrastructure networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(2), pages 235-243, June.
    16. Vaibhav Gaur & Om Prakash Yadav & Gunjan Soni & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore, 2021. "A literature review on network reliability analysis and its engineering applications," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(2), pages 167-181, April.
    17. Wang, Weiping & Yang, Saini & Hu, Fuyu & Stanley, H. Eugene & He, Shuai & Shi, Mimi, 2018. "An approach for cascading effects within critical infrastructure systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 164-177.
    18. Wu, Di & Ma, Feng & Javadi, Milad & Thulasiraman, Krishnaiya & Bompard, Ettore & Jiang, John N., 2017. "A study of the impacts of flow direction and electrical constraints on vulnerability assessment of power grid using electrical betweenness measures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 466(C), pages 295-309.
    19. Galbraith, John W. & Iuliani, Luca, 2019. "Measures of robustness for networked critical infrastructure: An empirical comparison on four electrical grids," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    20. Jufri, Fauzan Hanif & Widiputra, Victor & Jung, Jaesung, 2019. "State-of-the-art review on power grid resilience to extreme weather events: Definitions, frameworks, quantitative assessment methodologies, and enhancement strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1049-1065.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:11:y:2015:i:1:p:62-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=58 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.