IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/resjnl/v11y2019i1p63.html

Land Degradation and Challenges of Food Security

Author

Listed:
  • Gauri Shankar Gupta

Abstract

Land degradation has emerged as a serious problem during the last few decades. Soil fertility has declined considerably in many parts of the world due to intensive agriculture, over-grazing, water pollution, increasing use of fertilizers and pesticides, salinization, deforestation and accumulation of non-biodegradable waste. Vast tracts of land are facing desertification. Climate change is further aggravating land degradation, soil erosion and soil fertility. Evidence suggests during the last 6-7 decades over 35 percent of arable land has been degraded due to human induced activities. Soil being the natural medium for plant growth supports all life on earth. Rapidly increasing population, growing food-waste and declining soil fertility are posing serious challenges to humanity for future food security. Therefore, land degradation must come to a halt. Education, changes in agricultural policy and technological innovations are instruments that should be used for restoration of degraded land and stop further land degradation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gauri Shankar Gupta, 2019. "Land Degradation and Challenges of Food Security," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-63, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:resjnl:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/res/article/download/0/0/38331/38856
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/res/article/view/0/38331
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominati, Estelle & Patterson, Murray & Mackay, Alec, 2010. "A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1858-1868, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Velásquez & Ainhoa Rubio-Clemente & Daniel Tobón & Francisco Botero & Carlos Arrieta & Edwin Chica, 2024. "Experimental Optimization of the Propeller Turbine Performance Using the Response Surface Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Ireri, D. M. & Maina, F. W. & Muriithi, B. W. & Murage, A. W., 2023. "Economic impact of Push Pull Technology among smallholder cereal farmers in Eastern Africa," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365914, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    3. Praveen Kumar & Munish Sharma & Nagender Pal Butail & Arvind Kumar Shukla & Pardeep Kumar, 2024. "Spatial variability of soil properties and delineation of management zones for Suketi basin, Himachal Himalaya, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 14113-14138, June.
    4. Dénis B. Akouwerabou, 2023. "Effect of agricultural extension on cotton farmer's efficiency in arid and semi‐arid areas of Burkina Faso," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(1), pages 42-59, February.
    5. Yeong Sheng Tey & Mark Brindal & Suryani Darham & Syahaneem Mohamad Zainalabidin, 2024. "Adaptation technologies for climate-smart agriculture: a patent network analysis," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Mangole, Cool Dady & Maina, Charles Mbogo & Mulungu, Kelvin & Tschopp, Maurice & Harari, Nichole & Suresh, Roopa & Kassie, Menale, 2025. "Adoption of sustainable land and water management practices and their impact on crop productivity among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. Mădălina Trușcă & Ștefania Gâdea & Roxana Vidican & Vlad Stoian & Anamaria Vâtcă & Claudia Balint & Valentina Ancuța Stoian & Melinda Horvat & Sorin Vâtcă, 2023. "Exploring the Research Challenges and Perspectives in Ecophysiology of Plants Affected by Salinity Stress," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Ribašauskienė, Erika & Volkov, Artiom & Morkūnas, Mangirdas & Žičkienė, Agnė & Dabkiene, Vida & Štreimikienė, Dalia & Baležentis, Tomas, 2024. "Strategies for increasing agricultural viability, resilience and sustainability amid disruptive events: An expert-based analysis of relevance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Samaneh Sadat Nickayin & Francesca Perrone & Barbara Ermini & Giovanni Quaranta & Rosanna Salvia & Filippo Gambella & Gianluca Egidi, 2021. "Soil Quality and Peri-Urban Expansion of Cities: A Mediterranean Experience (Athens, Greece)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Antoine Vialle & Mario Giampieri, 2020. "Mapping Urbanization as an Anthropedogenetic Process: A Section through the Times of Urban Soils," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 262-279.
    4. Veronica Manganiello & Alessandro Banterle & Gabriele Canali & Geremia Gios & Giacomo Branca & Sofia Galeotti & Fabrizio De Filippis & Raffaella Zucaro, 2021. "Economic characterization of irrigated and livestock farms in The Po River Basin District," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-24.
    5. Quatrini, Simone, 2021. "Challenges and opportunities to scale up sustainable finance after the COVID-19 crisis: Lessons and promising innovations from science and practice," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    6. Yésica Gomez‐Jaramillo & Lina Berrouet & Clara Villegas‐Palacio & Linda Berrio‐Giraldo, 2024. "Conceptual framework for analyzing the sustainability of socio‐ecological systems with a focus on ecosystem services that support water security," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2298-2313, June.
    7. Daniel Toth & Jaroslava Janků & Adéla Marie Marhoul & Josef Kozák & Mansoor Maitah & Jan Jehlička & Lukáš Řeháček & Richard Přikryl & Tomáš Herza & Jan Vopravil & David Kincl & Tomáš Khel, 2023. "Soil quality assessment using SAS (Soil Assessment System)," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15.
    8. Greenhalgh, S. & Samarasinghe, O. & Curran-Cournane, F. & Wright, W. & Brown, P., 2017. "Using ecosystem services to underpin cost–benefit analysis: Is it a way to protect finite soil resources?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 1-14.
    9. Dardonville, Manon & Legrand, Baptiste & Clivot, Hugues & Bernardin, Claire & Bockstaller, Christian & Therond, Olivier, 2022. "Assessment of ecosystem services and natural capital dynamics in agroecosystems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Roberto Orellana & Andrés Cumsille & Paula Piña-Gangas & Claudia Rojas & Alejandra Arancibia & Salvador Donghi & Cristian Stuardo & Patricio Cabrera & Gabriela Arancibia & Franco Cárdenas & Felipe Sal, 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Urban Soils in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Rita Biasi & Roberta Farina & Elena Brunori, 2021. "Family Farming Plays an Essential Role in Preserving Soil Functionality: A Study on Active Managed and Abandoned Traditional Tree Crop-Based Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Calzolari, C. & Tarocco, P. & Lombardo, N. & Marchi, N. & Ungaro, F., 2020. "Assessing soil ecosystem services in urban and peri-urban areas: From urban soils survey to providing support tool for urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Wan Nie & Hongyan Guo & Lei Yang & Yaoyang Xu & Gang Li & Xiaohong Ruan & Yongguan Zhu & Liding Chen & Steven A. Banwart, 2020. "Economic Valuation of Earth’s Critical Zone: A Pilot Study of the Zhangxi Catchment, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Ana Simoes-Mota & Rosa Maria Poch & Alberto Enrique & Luis Orcaray & Iñigo Virto, 2021. "Soil Quality Assessment after 25 Years of Sewage Sludge vs. Mineral Fertilization in a Calcareous Soil," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Chenoweth, Jonathan & Anderson, Andrew R. & Kumar, Prashant & Hunt, W.F. & Chimbwandira, Sarah Jane & Moore, Trisha L.C., 2018. "The interrelationship of green infrastructure and natural capital," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 137-144.
    16. Dominati, E. & Mackay, A. & Green, S. & Patterson, M., 2014. "A soil change-based methodology for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services from agro-ecosystems: A case study of pastoral agriculture in New Zealand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 119-129.
    17. Dennis Junior Choruma & Oghenekaro Nelson Odume, 2019. "Exploring Farmers’ Management Practices and Values of Ecosystem Services in an Agroecosystem Context—A Case Study from the Eastern Cape, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Zhang, Da & Huang, Qingxu & He, Chunyang & Wu, Jianguo, 2017. "Impacts of urban expansion on ecosystem services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China: A scenario analysis based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 115-130.
    19. Foudi, Sébastien, 2012. "The role of farmers' property rights in soil ecosystem services conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 90-96.
    20. Fabrizio Ungaro & Paola Tarocco & Costanza Calzolari, 2025. "Leveraging Soil Geography for Land Use Planning: Assessing and Mapping Soil Ecosystem Services Indicators in Emilia-Romagna, NE Italy," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-32, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:resjnl:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.