IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v7y2014i4p282.html

Sustainability Implications of the Evolution of Rice Farming amid Rural Poverty: The Case of the Chhotanagpur Plateau in Eastern India

Author

Listed:
  • Pabitra Banik
  • Christopher Edmonds
  • Nobuhiko Fuwa

Abstract

This paper analyses longitudinal household surveys from Purulia and Giridih, two adjacent districts on the Chhotanagpur Plateau in Eastern India in 1997 and 2006, to assess the sustainability of the evolving local rice-based agricultural system. Increasing population with little outmigration suggests mounting burden on the already fragile land endowment. The pattern of land sales and purchases suggests land consolidation among fewer farmers is not a concern. Use of high yielding varieties (HYVs) and of chemical inputs increased in both districts. However, rice yields have increased in Purulia but stagnated in Giridih. Socioeconomic progress is more apparent in Purulia in other aspects as well, such as its land reform policy, the Panchayat system and higher rate of HYV adoption. Sustainability of the agricultural system in Purulia may be less than in Giridih due to its pattern of land transactions and the cautious move among farmers toward high-chemical intensity agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Pabitra Banik & Christopher Edmonds & Nobuhiko Fuwa, 2014. "Sustainability Implications of the Evolution of Rice Farming amid Rural Poverty: The Case of the Chhotanagpur Plateau in Eastern India," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 282-282, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:7:y:2014:i:4:p:282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/39133/21760
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/39133
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Praduman & Mittal, Surabhi, 2006. "Agricultural Productivity Trends in India: Sustainability Issues," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 19(Conferenc).
    2. Nobuhiko Fuwa & Christopher Edmonds & Pabitra Banik, 2007. "Are small‐scale rice farmers in eastern India really inefficient? Examining the effects of microtopography on technical efficiency estimates," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(3), pages 335-346, May.
    3. Deepti Sharma & Shardendu Shardendu, 2011. "Assessing farm-level agricultural sustainability over a 60-year period in rural eastern India," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 325-337, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Artiom Volkov & Mangirdas Morkunas & Tomas Balezentis & Vaida Šapolaitė, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Performance of the Agricultural Sectors of the Selected EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Muhammad Rizwan & Ping Qing & Abdul Saboor & Muhammad Amjed Iqbal & Adnan Nazir, 2020. "Production Risk and Competency among Categorized Rice Peasants: Cross-Sectional Evidence from an Emerging Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Das, V.K., 2015. "Total Factor Productivity Growth of Jowar and Bajra in India: A Comparative Analysis Using Different Methods of TFP Computation," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 28(2).
    4. Sheikh, Asjad Tariq & Chaudhary, Ashok Kumar & Mufti, Samaa & Davies, Stephen & Rola-Rubzen, Maria Fay, 2024. "Soil fertility in mixed crop-livestock farming systems of Punjab, Pakistan: The role of institutional factors and sustainable land management practices," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    5. Maria G. Lampridi & Claus G. Sørensen & Dionysis Bochtis, 2019. "Agricultural Sustainability: A Review of Concepts and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Michał Borychowski & Sebastian Stępień & Jan Polcyn & Aleksandra Tošović-Stevanović & Dragan Ćalović & Goran Lalić & Milena Žuža, 2020. "Socio-Economic Determinants of Small Family Farms’ Resilience in Selected Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Shamsheer Haq & Ismet Boz, 2020. "Measuring environmental, economic, and social sustainability index of tea farms in Rize Province, Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2545-2567, March.
    8. Mohit Kumar & Ganga Devi, 2025. "What drives total factor productivity in rice cultivation? An analysis of returns to research investment in western India," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(6), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Tasso Adamopoulos & Diego Restuccia, 2022. "Geography and Agricultural Productivity: Cross-Country Evidence from Micro Plot-Level Data," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(4), pages 1629-1653.
    10. Ramani, Shyama V. & Thutupalli, Ajay, 2015. "Emergence of controversy in technology transitions: Green Revolution and Bt cotton in India," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 198-212.
    11. Upul Yasantha, Nanayakkara Vithanage & Lokugam, H. P. Gunaratne & Kumara, Mahipala M.B.P. & Hewa, Waduge Cyril, 2014. "Comparison of Technical Efficiency and Socio-economic Status in Animal-crop Mixed Farming Systems in Dry Lowland Sri Lanka," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 4(02), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Konda, Bruhan & González-Sauri, Mario & Cowan, Robin & Yashodha, Yashodha & Veetill, Prakashan Chellattan, 2021. "Social Networks and Agricultural Performance: A Multiplex Analysis of Interactions Among Indian Rice Farmers," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315134, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Surabhi Mittal & Sanjay Gandhi & Gaurav Tripathi, "undated". "Socio-Economic Impact of Mobile Phones on Indian Agriculture," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 246, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    14. DONKOR, Emmanuel & OWUSU-SEKYERE, Enoch & OWUSU, Victor & JORDAAN, Henry, . "Impact Of Row-Planting Adoption On Productivity Of Rice Farming In Northern Ghana," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 19(2), pages 1-10.
    15. Parappurathu, S., 2015. "Agriculture Performance and Future Outlook on Food Commodities in Kerala," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 28(Conferenc).
    16. Ranjan Roy & Ngai Weng Chan, 2012. "An assessment of agricultural sustainability indicators in Bangladesh: review and synthesis," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 99-110, March.
    17. Rudra Bahadur SHRESTHA & Wen-Chi HUANG & Shriniwas GAUTAM & Thomas Gordon JOHNSON, 2016. "Efficiency of small scale vegetable farms: policy implications for the rural poverty reduction in Nepal," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(4), pages 181-195.
    18. Aditya, K.S. & Praveen, K.V. & Ahamed, B. Zaheer & Mazumder, Chiranjit & Kumar, Pramod & Kar, Amit, 2018. "Quantifying the Role of Disembodied Technologies in Enhancing Farm Income: A Case of Dibbling Method of Redgram Cultivation in Kalaburgi District of Northern Karnataka," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 73(03), July.
    19. Suresh, A., 2013. "Technical Change and Efficiency of Rice Production in India: A Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Approach," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 26(Conferenc).
    20. Jun Ho Seok & Hanpil Moon & GwanSeon Kim & Michael R. Reed, 2018. "Is Aging the Important Factor for Sustainable Agricultural Development in Korea? Evidence from the Relationship between Aging and Farm Technical Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:7:y:2014:i:4:p:282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.