IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v7y2014i2p78.html

Research on Environmental Tax with Emphasis on Developing Renewable Energy in Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zou
  • Shanshan Wang
  • Takeshi Mizunoya
  • Helmut Yabar
  • Yoshiro Higano

Abstract

Development of renewable energy is considered as an effective measure to control greenhouse gas emissions in the world. Policy instrument to promote development of the renewable energy have been paid more and more attention. As the most industrialized and urbanized region, Beijing plays as a demonstration role to show the impact of environmental policy instrument on the development of renewable energy and the mitigation of GHG emissions. In this paper, based on the input-ouput table, we constructed a dynamic input-output model introducing renewable energy industries, as well as the invironmental policy instrument of the emission tax. It not only can explore the relationships among Beijing’s renewable energy, economy and environment, but also can analyze the future trends of the economy and GHG intensity from 2010 to 2025. The objective function is the maximized GRP, subject to greenhouse gases emissions constraint and some subjective functions. The simulation results illustrated that with the GHG emissions constraint as1.5 times of the 2010 level, carbon tax as 80 CNY/t CO2-e is effective to promote the renewable energy development, economic development and GHG emissions mitigation. Annual growth rate of GRP can be up to 6.4%. The economic growth rate increases 0.6% compared with the condition when not introducing the policy instrument. In 2025, the GHG intensity will be 41.8 t CO2-e/million CNY, 41.4% reduced compared with the 2010 level. Total power generation of renewable energy can be 40.9 GWh, contributing to the reduction of 25 million CO2-e emissions in 15 years. This research proves that the proposed environmental policy instrument is effective to realize the government’s targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zou & Shanshan Wang & Takeshi Mizunoya & Helmut Yabar & Yoshiro Higano, 2014. "Research on Environmental Tax with Emphasis on Developing Renewable Energy in Beijing, China," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(2), pages 1-78, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/32518/19910
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/32518
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beckman, Jayson & Hertel, Thomas & Tyner, Wallace, 2011. "Validating energy-oriented CGE models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 799-806, September.
    2. Rout, Ullash K. & Voβ, Alfred & Singh, Anoop & Fahl, Ulrich & Blesl, Markus & Ó Gallachóir, Brian P., 2011. "Energy and emissions forecast of China over a long-time horizon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tehreem Fatima & Enjun Xia & Muhammad Ahad, 2019. "Oil demand forecasting for China: a fresh evidence from structural time series analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1205-1224, June.
    2. Cai, Yiyong & Newth, David & Finnigan, John & Gunasekera, Don, 2015. "A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 381-395.
    3. Li, Xi & Yu, Biying, 2019. "Peaking CO2 emissions for China's urban passenger transport sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Adom, Philip Kofi & Bekoe, William, 2012. "Conditional dynamic forecast of electrical energy consumption requirements in Ghana by 2020: A comparison of ARDL and PAM," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 367-380.
    5. Shao, Zhen & Gao, Fei & Zhang, Qiang & Yang, Shan-Lin, 2015. "Multivariate statistical and similarity measure based semiparametric modeling of the probability distribution: A novel approach to the case study of mid-long term electricity consumption forecasting in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 502-518.
    6. Glotin, David & Bourgeois, Cyril & Giraudet, Louis-Gaëtan & Quirion, Philippe, 2019. "Prediction is difficult, even when it's about the past: A hindcast experiment using Res-IRF, an integrated energy-economy model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(S1).
    7. Xu, Zhe & Meng, Lu & He, Dan & Shi, Xiaoliang & Chen, Ke, 2022. "Government Support's signaling effect on credit financing for new-energy enterprises," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Stuart McIntyre, 2018. "Exploring households' responsiveness to energy price changes using microdata," Working Papers 1806, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    9. Junguo Shi & Hubert Visas & Jabbar Ul-Haq & Shujaat Abbas & Sana Khanum, 2023. "Investigating the impact of export product diversification on environmental degradation: evidence from Chinese Provinces," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11455-11486, October.
    10. Michiel van Dijk & George Philippidis & Geert Woltjer, 2016. "Catching up with history: A methodology to validate global CGE models," FOODSECURE Technical papers 9, LEI Wageningen UR.
    11. Fujimori, Shinichiro & Dai, Hancheng & Masui, Toshihiko & Matsuoka, Yuzuru, 2016. "Global energy model hindcasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 293-301.
    12. Soon, Byung Min & Thompson, Wyatt, 2020. "Non-tariff barrier on chicken imports into Russia: Impact on production, trade and prices," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 583-596.
    13. Aragie, Emerta A. & McDonald, Scott, 2014. "Semi-subsistence Farm Households and Their Implications for Policy Response," Conference papers 332537, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Mondal, Md Alam Hossain & Rosegrant, Mark & Ringler, Claudia & Pradesha, Angga & Valmonte-Santos, Rowena, 2018. "The Philippines energy future and low-carbon development strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 142-154.
    15. Zhang, Yurong & Wang, Yuanfeng, 2013. "Barriers' and policies' analysis of China's building energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 768-773.
    16. Meng, Ming & Niu, Dongxiao, 2011. "Modeling CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion using the logistic equation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3355-3359.
    17. Zhang, Moyi & Huang, Xian-Jin, 2012. "Effects of industrial restructuring on carbon reduction: An analysis of Jiangsu Province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 515-526.
    18. Ladislav Krištoufek & Karel Janda & David Zilberman, 2012. "Correlations between biofuels and related commodities: A taxonomy perspective," Working Papers IES 2012/15, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Jun 2012.
    19. Geng, Jiang-Bo & Ji, Qiang, 2014. "Multi-perspective analysis of China's energy supply security," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 541-550.
    20. Zhaohua Wang & Chen Wang & Jianhua Yin, 2015. "Strategies for addressing climate change on the industrial level: affecting factors to CO 2 emissions of energy-intensive industries in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(2), pages 303-317, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.