IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v19y2024i6p321.html

Efficiency of Information Systems: Influence on Collective Intelligence and Organizational Agility

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Mignenan
  • Moussa Mahamat Ahmat
  • Eric Drocky Bayock

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of information systems (IS) and its influence on collective intelligence and organizational agility within companies. In particular, the research explores how a well-designed and high-performing IS can facilitate collaboration between employees, improve knowledge sharing, and strengthen organizational responsiveness to market changes. The study also seeks to understand the extent to which collective intelligence acts as a mediator between IS effectiveness and organizational agility. A mixed approach was used in this study, combining quantitative and qualitative methods to provide a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon. A sample of 150 companies was selected to answer a structured questionnaire measuring the effectiveness of their IS, their level of collective intelligence and their organizational agility. In addition, 30 semi-structured interviews were conducted with company managers to deepen the understanding of the organizational dynamics around IS and their impact on internal collaboration and flexibility. Quantitative data were analyzed using multiple regressions and correlations, while qualitative data were explored using thematic analysis. The results reveal a significant correlation between IS effectiveness and collective intelligence (0.62), as well as between collective intelligence and organizational agility (0.58). The study shows that companies with effective information systems benefit from better collaboration between their teams. This promotes collective decision-making and strengthens their ability to react quickly to changes in the market. The qualitative analysis confirms that IS facilitates knowledge sharing and allows for greater transparency in decision-making processes, which improves organizational responsiveness. Moreover, it has been found that collective intelligence acts as a key mediator between IS efficiency and agility, increasing the flexibility and adaptability of companies. The theoretical implications of this study reinforce existing work on information systems, showing how they promote collective intelligence and organizational agility. From a practical perspective, the results indicate that companies need to invest in flexible and collaborative information systems to improve their overall performance. Information systems that facilitate knowledge sharing and cross-functional communication within teams are strategic assets for organizations looking to increase their responsiveness and competitiveness in ever-changing environments. It is also essential to promote a culture of collective intelligence to maximize the impact of information systems on organizational agility.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Mignenan & Moussa Mahamat Ahmat & Eric Drocky Bayock, 2024. "Efficiency of Information Systems: Influence on Collective Intelligence and Organizational Agility," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(6), pages 321-321, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:6:p:321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/51043/55354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/51043
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    2. Victor Mignenan, 2021. "Collective Intelligence and Entrepreneurial Resilience in the Context of Covid-19," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(9), pages 1-1, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    2. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    3. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Féniès, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    4. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.
    5. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    6. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.
    7. Yobera Hezekiah Parrot & Dr. Paul Sang, 2017. "Influence Of User Acceptance On The Performance Of Ict Firms In Nairobi County," European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, International Peer Review Journals and Books, vol. 2(7), pages 80-88.
    8. Sanghyun Kim & Bora Kim & Minsoo Seo, 2020. "Impacts of Sustainable Information Technology Capabilities on Information Security Assimilation: The Moderating Effects of Policy—Technology Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Jung Lee & Jae-Nam Lee & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "Antecedents of cognitive trust and affective distrust and their mediating roles in building customer loyalty," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-175, February.
    10. Mujahid Mohiuddin Babu & Panuel Rozario Prince, 2011. "Factors Influencing the Overall Customer Satisfaction of the Wireless Internet Service Users: An Empirical Study in Bangladesh," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 2(6), pages 14-24, September.
    11. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    12. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Ilham Hidayah Napitupulu, 2023. "Internal Control, Manager’s Competency, Management Accounting Information Systems and Good Corporate Governance: Evidence from Rural Banks in Indonesia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(3), pages 563-585, June.
    14. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    15. Suryani Che Din & Mazuin Mat Halif, 2025. "A Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Quality of Mobile Learning through Cloud-Based Records Management among Students," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 6361-6370, June.
    16. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    17. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Masood Fathi, 2019. "Modeling the Success of Application-Based Mobile Banking," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Alshehri, Abdullah, 2025. "When the recipe is more important than the ingredients, understanding factors affecting customer loyalty in unmanned convenience store using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Nicolas Jullien, 2012. "What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)," Post-Print hal-00857208, HAL.
    20. Younès Boughzala & Inès Bouzid & Imed Boughzala, 2012. "Les déterminants de l'adoption de l'e-achat public en France : une étude qualitative auprès des praticiens," Post-Print hal-02408949, HAL.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:19:y:2024:i:6:p:321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.