IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v13y2017i1p225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Performance: Evidence from Sri Lankan Banking and Finance Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Kingsley Alawattegama

Abstract

This study explores the impact of the adoption of enterprise risk management (ERM) practices on firm performance. A sample of forty five banking and finance companies listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) was selected for this study and uses both primary and secondary data for the empirical analysis. The extent of adoption of ERM practices was assessed by using the ERM integrated framework of committee of sponsoring organization (COSO) of the Treadway Commission of USA. Return on equity (ROE) is used as a proxy to measure the firm performance and uses multivariate regression analysis to assess the impact of key ERM functions on firm performance. This study finds none of the eight key ERM functions suggested by the COSO’s ERM integrated framework has a significant impact on firm performance. Event identifications, risk assessment, risk response and information & communication indicate a positive impact on firm performance. However, none of those impacts were significant. Surprisingly, empirical evidence reveals that objective setting; event identification, control activities and monitoring of ERM functions have a negative, but not significant, impact on the firm performance. These findings induce the corporate managers to pay a close attention to the cost-benefits considerations when designing and implementing ERM practices and not heavily relied upon and extensively invest on ERM as a vehicle for creating firm value.

Suggested Citation

  • Kingsley Alawattegama, 2017. "The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Performance: Evidence from Sri Lankan Banking and Finance Industry," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 225-225, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/72063/39695
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/72063
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald Pagach & Richard Warr, 2011. "The Characteristics of Firms That Hire Chief Risk Officers," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(1), pages 185-211, March.
    2. André P. Liebenberg & Robert E. Hoyt, 2003. "The Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence From the Appointment of Chief Risk Officers," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(1), pages 37-52, February.
    3. Gordon, Lawrence A. & Loeb, Martin P. & Tseng, Chih-Yang, 2009. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 301-327, July.
    4. Leen Paape & Roland F. Spekl�, 2012. "The Adoption and Design of Enterprise Risk Management Practices: An Empirical Study," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 533-564, January.
    5. Beasley, Mark S. & Clune, Richard & Hermanson, Dana R., 2005. "Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 521-531.
    6. Robert E. Hoyt & Andre P. Liebenberg, 2011. "The Value of Enterprise Risk Management," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(4), pages 795-822, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naciye Sekerci & Don Pagach, 2020. "Firm Ownership and Enterprise Risk Management Implementation: Evidence from the Nordic Region," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Therese R. Viscelli & Mark S. Beasley & Dana R. Hermanson, 2016. "Research Insights About Risk Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    3. Florio, Cristina & Leoni, Giulia, 2017. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 56-74.
    4. Mónica Hernández-Madrigal & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán & Élfego Ramírez-Flores, 2020. "Are external pressures always behind ERM implementation? Evidence from Spanish listed firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 86-100, September.
    5. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Elisabetta Mafrolla & Felice Matozza, 2014. "Risk management and firm size: a survey of Italian private companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 87-108.
    7. Yongrok Choi & Xiaoxia Ye & Lu Zhao & Amanda Luo, 2016. "Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 281-300, February.
    8. Rita Lamboglia & Francesco Paolone & Daniela Mancini, 2019. "Determinants of the implementation of environmental risk indicators: Empirical evidence from the Italian manufacturing context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 307-316, March.
    9. Heidinger, Dinah & Gatzert, Nadine, 2018. "Awareness, determinants and value of reputation risk management: Empirical evidence from the banking and insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 106-118.
    10. Yongrok Choi & Xiaoxia Ye & Lu Zhao & Amanda C. Luo, 2016. "Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 281-300, February.
    11. Johnston, Joseph & Soileau, Jared, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and accruals estimation error," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    12. Ivana Dvorski Lacković & Nataša Kurnoga & Danijela Miloš Sprčić, 2022. "Three-factor model of Enterprise Risk Management implementation: exploratory study of non-financial companies," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 101-122, June.
    13. Milos Sprcic, Danijela & Pecina, Ena & Orsag, Silvije, 2017. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices In Listed Croatian Companies," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 8(3), pages 219-230.
    14. Zhu, Delong & Li, Zhe & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj, 2023. "Evaluation of the critical success factors of dynamic enterprise risk management in manufacturing SMEs using an integrated fuzzy decision-making model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    15. Chen, Yu-Lun & Chuang, Yi-Wei & Huang, Hong-Gia & Shih, Jhuan-Yu, 2020. "The value of implementing enterprise risk management: Evidence from Taiwan’s financial industry," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    16. Muhammed Altuntas & Thomas R. Berry-Stölzle & J. David Cummins, 2021. "Enterprise risk management and economies of scale and scope: evidence from the German insurance industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 811-845, April.
    17. Alessandra Allini & Raffaela Casciello & Marco Maffei & Martina Prisco, 2022. "The national culture as a determinant of ERM quality: Empirical evidence in the European banking context," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(1), pages 79-102.
    18. Olayinka Adedayo Erin & Adebola Daniel Kolawole & Abdurafiu Olaiya Noah, 2020. "Risk governance and cybercrime: the hierarchical regression approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Mojca Marc & Marika Arena & Darja Peljhan, 2023. "The role of interactive style of use in improving risk management effectiveness," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Danijela Miloš Sprčić & Marina Mešin Žagar & Željko Šević & Mojca Marc, 2016. "Does enterprise risk management influence market value – A long-term perspective," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 65-88, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.