IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v12y2020i1p1.html

Health Psychological Case Study of High Intensity, Low Impact, Physical Training Program

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen D. Edwards

Abstract

This case study reports on the health psychological evaluation of an integrated, high intensity, lo impact, physical training program for a 31 year old, male accountancy teacher. High intensity components consisted of running, cycling and the Canadian Airforce 5BX program. Low impact components comprised walking and Chi-gung inspired Pilates. Squash and swimming were also occasional activities. The pre-test and post-test, process and outcome evaluative, research design included qualitative and quantitative components in the form of psychometric testing, diarizing of physical activity, experiential descriptions of the various components and program outcome evaluation. Quantitative findings indicated significant improvements in psychophysiological coherence, mood, resilience and general health. Qualitative experiential descriptions provided further evidence of health psychological growth. Integrative findings emphasize the importance of physical training programs based on client individual preferences. The client reported that he found the program to be enjoyable, flexible, invigorating and readily adaptable to suit the needs of various individuals who face time and space constraints in their daily lives. With minimal innovation for greater complexity, control and/or challenges, such programs may readily yield enjoyable flow experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen D. Edwards, 2020. "Health Psychological Case Study of High Intensity, Low Impact, Physical Training Program," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/41623/43184
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/41623
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans-Gerd Ridder, 2017. "The theory contribution of case study research designs," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(2), pages 281-305, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baharudin Kadir & Mohd Farid Shamsudin, 2019. "A Case Study Analysis of Typhidot: An Example of Market-Oriented R&D Commercialization in Malaysia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 75-81, August.
    2. Peter W. de Langen & Henrik Sornn-Friese & James Hallworth, 2020. "The Role of Port Development Companies in Transitioning the Port Business Ecosystem; The Case of Port of Amsterdam’s Circular Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Sigrid Endres & Jürgen Weibler, 2020. "Understanding (non)leadership phenomena in collaborative interorganizational networks and advancing shared leadership theory: an interpretive grounded theory study," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 275-309, April.
    4. León-Bravo, Verónica & Caniato, Federico, 2024. "Sustainability performance measurement in the food supply chain: Trade-offs, institutional pressures, and contextual factors," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 633-646.
    5. Katerina Gkalitsiou & Dimosthenis Kotsopoulos, 2023. "When the Going Gets Tough, Leaders Use Metaphors and Storytelling: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study on Communication in the Context of COVID-19 and Ukraine Crises," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-42, April.
    6. Davide Settembre-Blundo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Sonia Medina-Salgado & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 107-132, December.
    7. Vladimir Vladimirovich Maltsev & Andrei Yurievich Yudanov, 2023. "Toward a Demsetzian Knowledge Theory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1371-1385, June.
    8. Christoph Friedrich & Daniel Feser, 2024. "Combining knowledge bases for small wins in peripheral regions. An analysis of the role of innovation intermediaries in sustainability transitions," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 44(2), pages 211-236, June.
    9. Robin Hogrefe & Sabine Bohnet-Joschko, 2023. "The Social Dimension of Corporate Sustainability: Review of an Evolving Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Markéta Supa & Lucie Römer & Vojtěch Hodboď, 2022. "Including the Experiences of Children and Youth in Media Education," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 391-399.
    11. Paul Bossong & Anne Reinhardt & Ralf Elbert, 2025. "Adoption drivers and barriers of digital freight transport platforms—An intermodal case study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Anastasia Christodoulou & Kevin Cullinane, 0. "Potential for, and drivers of, private voluntary initiatives for the decarbonisation of short sea shipping: evidence from a Swedish ferry line," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    13. Brydie Clarke & Janelle Kwon & Boyd Swinburn & Gary Sacks, 2021. "Understanding the dynamics of obesity prevention policy decision-making using a systems perspective: A case study of Healthy Together Victoria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Friedrich, Christoph & Feser, Daniel, 2021. "Combining knowledge bases for system innovation in regions: Insights from an East German case study," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 430, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    15. Andrejs Čirjevskis, 2021. "Value Maximizing Decisions in the Real Estate Market: Real Options Valuation Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Bosgraaf, Liesbeth & Spreen, Marinus & Pattiselanno, Kim & van Hooren, Susan, 2025. "Perceived effects of an art therapeutic treatment (ArAT) for children and adolescents with psychosocial problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    17. Youngsoo Lee & Joosung Lee, 2020. "Interactive Game-Content-Based Storytelling for the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Sally Randles & Allison Loconto & Marc Steen, 2024. "Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: Examples from Bolivia and Netherlands," Post-Print hal-04561780, HAL.
    19. Hannah Charlotte Joos & Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß & Ulrich Pidun, 2020. "Project Stakeholder Management as the Integration of Stakeholder Salience, Public Participation, and Nonmarket Strategies," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(3), pages 447-477, July.
    20. Zhipeng Zhou & Chaozhi Li & Chuanmin Mi & Lingfei Qian, 2019. "Exploring the Potential Use of Near-Miss Information to Improve Construction Safety Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.