IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v22y2026i1p54.html

Negotiated Autonomy: How Rural Elites Reconstruct Village Autonomy Through the Project System

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang Xujun
  • Azeem Fazwan Bin Ahmad Farouk

Abstract

The transformation of rural governance in China under the project system presents a paradox- while state-led projects intensify administrative penetration, new forms of local autonomy continue to emerge. This study examines how rural elites—returnees with urban experience—mediate between bureaucratic control and community agency to reconstruct village autonomy in project-based rural revitalization. Based on a qualitative single-case study of L Village in Shanxi Province, drawing on semi-structured interviews and project documents, the findings reveal that village autonomy in L Village has evolved into a negotiated form through three interlinked mechanisms- resource translation, institutional bricolage, and symbolic legitimation. Rural elites act as embedded intermediaries who reinterpret bureaucratic procedures in locally meaningful ways, reassemble formal and informal rules to create flexibility, and deploy moral-cultural narratives to legitimise authority. These processes transform external control into adaptive governance capacity, producing a hybrid condition of negotiated autonomy—a relational mode of village autonomy that coexists with state control. The study contributes to debates on rural governance and state–society relations by extending Evans' notion of embedded autonomy to the micro-village level. It argues that the project system relocates village autonomy to bureaucratic–local interfaces, where negotiation becomes the defining feature of grassroots governance in contemporary rural China.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang Xujun & Azeem Fazwan Bin Ahmad Farouk, 2026. "Negotiated Autonomy: How Rural Elites Reconstruct Village Autonomy Through the Project System," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 22(1), pages 1-54, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:22:y:2026:i:1:p:54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/52835/57599
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/52835
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sisto, Roberta & Lopolito, Antonio & van Vliet, Mathijs, 2018. "Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support Local Action Groups in complying with CLLD requirements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 442-450.
    2. Monica Martinez-Bravo & Gerard Padró i Miquel & Nancy Qian & Yang Yao, 2022. "The Rise and Fall of Local Elections in China," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(9), pages 2921-2958, September.
    3. Jean Hillier, 2000. "Going round the Back? Complex Networks and Informal Action in Local Planning Processes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(1), pages 33-54, January.
    4. Eliza Darling, 2005. "The City in the Country: Wilderness Gentrification and the Rent Gap," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(6), pages 1015-1032, June.
    5. Shen, Mingrui & Shen, Jianfa, 2018. "Evaluating the cooperative and family farm programs in China: A rural governance perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 240-250.
    6. Horacio Larreguy & Cesar E. Montiel Olea & Pablo Querubin, 2017. "Political Brokers: Partisans or Agents? Evidence from the Mexican Teachers' Union," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(4), pages 877-891, October.
    7. Hanming Fang & Ming Li & Zenan Wu, 2022. "Tournament-Style Political Competition and Local Protectionism: Theory and Evidence from China," PIER Working Paper Archive 22-031, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    8. Chen, Kunqiu & Long, Hualou & Liao, Liuwen & Tu, Shuangshuang & Li, Tingting, 2020. "Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lai, Weizheng, 2024. "The effect of education on voter turnout in China's rural elections," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 230-247.
    2. Jiang, Weijie & Yu, Hui & Chen, Qi, 2024. "Surname distance and interregional investments," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Ellen Banzhaf & Sally Anderson & Gwendoline Grandin & Richard Hardiman & Anne Jensen & Laurence Jones & Julius Knopp & Gregor Levin & Duncan Russel & Wanben Wu & Jun Yang & Marianne Zandersen, 2022. "Urban-Rural Dependencies and Opportunities to Design Nature-Based Solutions for Resilience in Europe and China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Xu, Guangyu & Chen, Huang, 2025. "Inclusive growth dilemma: Weighing the pros and cons of land market reform," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Finan, Frederico & Seira, Enrique & Simpser, Alberto, 2021. "Voting with one’s neighbors: Evidence from migration within Mexico," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Zhengxin Li & Chengjun Liu & Xihui Chen, 2022. "Power of Digital Economy to Drive Urban-Rural Integration: Intrinsic Mechanism and Spatial Effect, from Perspective of Multidimensional Integration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Farina Khan & Kashif Abbass & Wu Qun, 2025. "Charting the Path to Sustainable Development: Insights From a Review of Land Use Efficiency Research and Total Factor Productivity in Achieving SDGs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(5), pages 16187-16210, November.
    8. Hillary Angelo & David Wachsmuth, 2015. "Urbanizing Urban Political Ecology: A Critique of Methodological Cityism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 16-27, January.
    9. Jeremy Bowles & Horacio Larreguy & Shelley Liu, 2020. "How Weakly Institutionalized Parties Monitor Brokers in Developing Democracies: Evidence from Postconflict Liberia," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 952-967, October.
    10. Hu, Xiaoliang & Li, Hongbo & Zhang, Xiaolin & Yuan, Yuan & Jia, Kaiyang, 2024. "How rent facilitates capital accumulation: A case study of rural land capitalization in Suzhou, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. John McDonagh, 2022. "Designation, Incentivisation and Farmer Participation—Exploring Options for Sustainable Rural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, May.
    12. Hamish Kallin & Tom Slater, 2014. "Activating Territorial Stigma: Gentrifying Marginality on Edinburgh's Periphery," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1351-1368, June.
    13. Pablo Muñoz & Cristóbal Otero, 2025. "Managers and Public Hospital Performance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(11), pages 4040-4074, November.
    14. Alexander Walter & Roland Scholz, 2007. "Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: a comparative evaluation of transport planning projects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 195-212, March.
    15. Eric Clark & Annika Pissin, 2023. "Potential rents vs. potential lives," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(6), pages 1485-1505, September.
    16. Jieying Yang & Li Yu & Jingxiang Zhang, 2024. "Impacts on Rural Community Development and Governance by Different Land Ownership: A Comparative Study Based on Two Villages in China," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(6), pages 1616-1635, December.
    17. Yangguang Hou & Haoyang Kang & Meichen Fu & Xu Dong & Yuting Wu & Lijiao Li, 2025. "Multiple Effects of Land Transfer on Rural Revitalization: A Meta-Analysis of Chinese Cases," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Xinyao Li & Lingzhi Wang & Bryan Pijanowski & Lingpeng Pan & Hichem Omrani & Anqi Liang & Yi Qu, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Transition Mode of Recessive Cultivated Land Use Morphology in the Huaibei Region of the Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Chuantao Cui & Leona Shao-Zhi Li, 2024. "More but not better: Career incentives of local leaders and entrepreneurial entry in China," Working Papers 202417, University of Macau, Faculty of Business Administration.
    20. Han, Linsong & Li, Xun & Xu, Gang, 2022. "Anti-corruption and poverty alleviation: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 150-172.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:22:y:2026:i:1:p:54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.