IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v32y2000i1p33-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Going round the Back? Complex Networks and Informal Action in Local Planning Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Hillier

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia)

Abstract

In negotiated land-use planning decisions there may be intractable opposition and the use of strength, strategy, and influence outside of formal public participation processes—forms of communicative behaviour neglected by Habermasian theory. I investigate the empirical reality of the importance of networks and lobbying as a form of informal action in influencing planning outcomes through a case study in Western Australia. I map the networks of social relations within which stakeholders act and the links and energy flows between them. I examine stakeholders' utterances and questions of who networks and acts informally; why, when, and how they do so, and with what implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Hillier, 2000. "Going round the Back? Complex Networks and Informal Action in Local Planning Processes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(1), pages 33-54, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:1:p:33-54
    DOI: 10.1068/a321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a321
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jane Zheng, 2021. "STRUCTURING ARTISTIC CREATIVITY FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A ‘CREATIVE CITY’: Urban Sculpture Planning in Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 795-813, September.
    2. Alexander Walter & Roland Scholz, 2007. "Critical success conditions of collaborative methods: a comparative evaluation of transport planning projects," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 195-212, March.
    3. Janet Fisher & Katrina Brown, 2009. "Wind Energy on the Isle of Lewis: Implications for Deliberative Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(10), pages 2516-2536, October.
    4. Natanya Meyer & Daniel Francois Meyer & Karabo Molefe, 2016. "Barriers To Small Informal Business Development And Entrepreneurship: The Case Of The Emfuleni Region," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(1), pages 121-133, June.
    5. Geoffrey A. Battista & Kevin Manaugh, 2019. "My way or the highway? Framing transportation planners’ attitudes in negotiating professional expertise and public insight," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1271-1290, August.
    6. P M McGuirk, 2001. "Situating Communicative Planning Theory: Context, Power, and Knowledge," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(2), pages 195-217, February.
    7. Liljenfeldt, Johanna & Pettersson, Örjan, 2017. "Distributional justice in Swedish wind power development – An odds ratio analysis of windmill localization and local residents’ socio-economic characteristics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 648-657.
    8. Kristian James Ruming, 2009. "Development Configurations and Planning Negotiations: A Case of Fringe Development in Sydney, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1461-1483, June.
    9. Sara González & Patsy Healey, 2005. "A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2055-2069, October.
    10. Laura E Tate, 2013. "Growth-Management Implementation in Metropolitan Vancouver: Lessons from Actor-Network Theory," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(5), pages 783-800, October.
    11. Savis Gohari & Tor Medalen & Rolee Aranya, 2019. "Exploring the Impact of Complex Multi-Level Governance Structures on the Societal Contribution of Universities to Knowledge-Based Urban Development," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Katherine Brookfield, 2017. "Getting involved in plan-making: Participation in neighbourhood planning in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(3), pages 397-416, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:1:p:33-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.