IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2026i1p36-44.html

Consequences of the Introduction of Mandatory Sustainability Reporting: A Critical Review of International Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Serhii Ostapchuk

    (National Scientific Centre "Institute of Agrarian Economics", Ukraine)

  • Lesia Voliak

    (National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine, Ukraine)

Abstract

Today, more and more countries are considering introducing mandatory sustainability reporting as a tool to meet the growing information needs of a wide range of stakeholders and to increase business transparency. Strengthening regulation on mandatory reporting has significant economic, social, and managerial consequences for companies, investors, and society as a whole. The article aims to examine the socio-economic consequences of the introduction of mandatory sustainability reporting across different countries worldwide, systematize the identified effects, and assess pan-European trends in the development of sustainability reporting. The key method of this study is the content analysis of previous studies on the broad socio-economic consequences of the introduction of mandatory sustainability reporting across different countries worldwide, with emphasis on specific effects for companies. The main information base of the study is previous research over the past 5 years, based on a wide range of collected empirical data. Although previous researchers have already analyzed the collected data, their broader comparisons allow the formation of new scientific conclusions. The results of the study indicate that the consequences of introducing mandatory sustainability reporting across different countries worldwide are mostly positive. However, in the short term, companies may incur additional costs from disclosing information in ESG reports. In addition, in some countries, implementing international norms and effective mechanisms to monitor companies' compliance can be difficult. The article reveals and systematizes the positive effects of mandatory sustainability reporting, which ultimately improve companies' perceptions among investors, increase the quality and transparency of the data disclosed in reports, and make companies more responsible to society. The attitude of EU countries towards the introduction of mandatory sustainability reporting, in line with the requirements of the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), shows that companies across different countries and sectors of the EU economy are wary of mandatory disclosure of ESG aspects, given competition in international markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Serhii Ostapchuk & Lesia Voliak, 2026. "Consequences of the Introduction of Mandatory Sustainability Reporting: A Critical Review of International Practice," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 36-44, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2026:i:1:p:36-44
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2026-1(111)-36-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afj.org.ua/storage/pdf/1210-2026-1-pub.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://afj.org.ua/en/article/1210
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2026-1(111)-36-44?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziyuan Xia & Anchen Sun & Xiaodong Cai & Saixing Zeng, 2025. "Analyzing corporate ESG reporting through data mining: evolutionary trends and strategic model," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 634-664, October.
    2. Katrin Hummel & Dominik Jobst, 2024. "An Overview of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Legislation in the European Union," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 320-355, September.
    3. Cui, Xue & Li, Ruochen & Xue, Shuyu & Zhang, Xiaomei, 2025. "Mandatory versus voluntary: The real effect of ESG disclosures on corporate earnings management," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Marvin Nipper & Andreas Ostermaier & Jochen Theis, 2022. "Mandatory Disclosure of Standardized Sustainability Metrics: The Case of the EU Taxonomy Regulation," Papers 2205.15576, arXiv.org.
    5. Peter Fiechter & Jörg‐Markus Hitz & Nico Lehmann, 2022. "Real Effects of a Widespread CSR Reporting Mandate: Evidence from the European Union's CSR Directive," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 60(4), pages 1499-1549, September.
    6. Do, Trung K. & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2023. "Is mandatory sustainability disclosure associated with default risk? Evidence from emerging markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    7. Triantafyllos Papafloratos & Tania Pantazi, 2025. "A Systematic Review of the Effects of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Bhaskar, Ratikant & Chortane, Sana Gaied & Kumar, Ashish & Pandey, Dharen Kumar, 2026. "Mandatory sustainability reporting and firm performance: A quasi-natural experiment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hua & Lai, Jie & Guo, Zheng, 2025. "When greenwashing meets ESG: Exploring the role of third-party ESG ratings in corporate greenwashing behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Ni, Mingjie, 2025. "ESG disclosure and corporate human capital upgrading in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 49-64.
    3. Stefanie Reustlen & Martin Stawinoga, 2024. "Do internationally operating companies act in a socially sustainable manner? An empirical comparison of disclosure regarding employee matters and human rights matters," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Haozhe Song & Gunnar Rimmel, 2025. "Debtholders' reaction to sustainability reporting regulations: International evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 88-115, January.
    5. Jinsong Liu & Jiaren Pang & Xinyi Zhang & Xi Zhou, 2026. "Does Disclosing Well Lead to Doing Good?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 121-151, March.
    6. Tingqian Pu, 2025. "Bridging digitalization and environmental, social, and governance performance: the moderating effect of CEO duality and government linked corporations," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Cho, Seunghyun & Pae, Jinhan & Yoo, Choong-Yuel, 2025. "Post-traumatic growth of CEOs and corporate giving: Evidence from the Korean War," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Boungou, Whelsy & Dufau, Bastien, 2025. "Shareholder wealth effects of corporate sustainability reporting regulations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Zhang, Chenyu & Qian, Aimin & Lou, Xu & Zhang, Guiling, 2024. "The politics of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1406-1428.
    10. Aobdia, Daniel & Köchling, Gerrit & Limbach, Peter & Yoon, Aaron, 2025. "Emissions restatements after the SEC's request for public input on climate-related disclosures: Evidence from carbon disclosure project filings," CFR Working Papers 25-11, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    11. Alexandre Pacheco & Manuel Branco, 2025. "Banks’ Sustainability Reporting in Brazil," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Krivogorsky, Victoria, 2024. "Sustainability reporting with two different voices: The European Union and the International Sustainability Standards Board," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Huang, Shuai & Pan, Dongliang & Zhong, Shengyang & Cao, Zhenxiang, 2025. "Corporate disclosure quality and financing constraints: Evidence from chinese listed companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Miao Yu & Ziyao San & Dan Shi & Albert Tsang, 2025. "Analyst forecasts worldwide: The impact of ESG information from diverse sources and regulatory mandates," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 25(2), June.
    15. Haruyoshi Ito, 2026. "Comment on “How Sovereign Sustainable Bond Issuance Shakes up the Corporate Sustainable Bond Market?: Evidence From Asian Markets”," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 21(1), pages 68-69, January.
    16. Jintao Lu & Dan Rong & Gabriel Eweje & Xiaolin Yuan & Malin Song & Cory Searcy, 2025. "Effective environmental strategy or illusory tactics? Corporate greenwashing and innovation willingness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1338-1356, January.
    17. Jiaying Li & Yuting Xie & Liang Dong, 2026. "From Voluntary to Mandatory: The Bibliometric and Meta‐Analytical Insights Into Effects of ESG Disclosure Practices and Regulations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1387-1402, January.
    18. Madhavan Vishnu Nampoothiri & Oliver Entrop & Thillai Rajan Annamalai, 2024. "Effect of mandatory sustainability performance disclosures on firm value: Evidence from listed European firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5220-5235, November.
    19. Aline Grahn, 2025. "Greenhouse Gas Disclosure: Evidence from Private Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 177-194, February.
    20. Weiqing Chen & Chengzhu Sun & Albert Tsang & Xiao Zeng, 2026. "ESG Reporting, ESG Contracting, and Executive Compensation: International Evidence," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 380-410, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2026:i:1:p:36-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhii Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.