IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5336-d1675216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Triantafyllos Papafloratos

    (Business Administration Department, International Hellenic University, Terma Magnisias, 62 124 Serres, Greece)

  • Tania Pantazi

    (Tourism Management Department, Hellenic Open University, Evdoxou 5, 263 31 Patras, Greece)

Abstract

An increasing number of countries are introducing regulations on mandatory sustainability reporting, while researchers from various disciplines are trying to evaluate the effects of rendering sustainability reports mandatory. We conducted a review of 171 articles in Scopus-indexed journals, aiming to identify the most prominent topics and key research outputs. Our findings are categorized into four broad themes: the effects of legislation on the quality and quantity of the reports, the effects of financial performance on firms, the effects of ESG performance on firms and other effects. This is the first review to include a large number of empirical and non-empirical studies from various disciplines, including law. The positive effect of legislation on the quality, credibility and comparability of reports is more pronounced for countries outside Europe. The effects related to the financial performance of firms are positive in the long run. At the same time, regulation induces companies to adopt more CSR initiatives and may therefore be seen as an effective tool in rendering businesses more sustainable. Other perceived effects of increasing regulation are the fragmentation, complexity and rapid evolvement of the legislative framework on sustainability reporting, as well as the role of the institutional environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Triantafyllos Papafloratos & Tania Pantazi, 2025. "A Systematic Review of the Effects of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5336-:d:1675216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5336-:d:1675216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.