IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2022i1p65-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Performance Measurement Systems for NCA-Sales-Teams

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Beck

    (International School of Management, Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Jurgen Reck

    (International School of Management, Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Patrick Siegfried

    (International School of Management, Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

In 2019 at IBM, it was found that there is a strong dependence on a few large banks in bank sales, and the growth targets of the sales division cannot be achieved due to the existing business with these same customers. To counteract this dependency, an NCA-specific sales team for the banking industry was established to support small and medium-sized banks with personal commitment and expertise and to develop them into long-term business partners of IBM. This research focuses on the development of a performance measurement system for NCA-Sales teams. It postulates the hypothesis that more effective and better-suited performance measurement systems can be developed for NCA-Sales of information technology towards financial institutions. Authors use the methodology of expert interviews and Mayrings qualitative content analysis to gain insights into the relevant factors that need to be considered when evaluating the performance of such sales teams. The paper identifies stakeholders, challenges, and goals that should be integrated into a performance measurement system as well as KPIs to measure them. The results are being consolidated into a conceptual sketch for an NCA-sales optimized PMS. The paper distinguishes itself from other research through an approach that gives detailed guidance for the practical implementation of its findings. The research was conducted with professionals in the IT sector; however, all of them were working for the same company, and the data was collected in the short span of one week as it was part of a research. The outcome can be used for further studies on how to effectively measure performance in NCA-Sales teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Beck & Jurgen Reck & Patrick Siegfried, 2022. "Development of a Performance Measurement Systems for NCA-Sales-Teams," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 65-87, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2022:i:1:p:65-87
    DOI: 10.33146/2307-9878-2022-1(95)-65-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/888-rozrobka-sistem-ocinki-efektivnosti-komand-iz-zaluchennya-prodazhu-novih-klientiv.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/888/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33146/2307-9878-2022-1(95)-65-87?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Véronique Malleret & Annick Bourguignon & Hanne Norreklit, 2004. "The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord : the ideological dimension," Post-Print hal-00486648, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walid Cheffi & Adel Beldi, 2007. "Conception D'Un Outil De Mesure De La Performance : Divergences Entre Controleurs De Gestion Et Managers. Cas D'Un Groupe Industriel Français," Post-Print halshs-00543093, HAL.
    2. Bourguignon, Annick & Saulpic, Olivier & Zarlowski, Philippe, 2006. "Management Accounting Change in the Public Sector: A French Case Study and a New Institutionalist Perspective," ESSEC Working Papers DR 06018, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    3. Dag Øivind Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard: Fashion or Virus?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.
    4. Mandy M. Cheng & Peter F. Luckett & Habib Mahama, 2007. "Effect of perceived conflict among multiple performance goals and goal difficulty on task performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 47(2), pages 221-242, June.
    5. Benjamin Dreveton & Sébastien Rocher, 2009. "The success story of a ‘successful?' management device," Post-Print halshs-00479810, HAL.
    6. Vilanova, Mateus Ricardo Nogueira & Magalhães Filho, Paulo & Balestieri, José Antônio Perrella, 2015. "Performance measurement and indicators for water supply management: Review and international cases," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Marek Barowicz, 2022. "Zrównoważona karta wyników w procesie kryzysowego zarządzania bankiem w dobie pandemii COVID-19," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 53(1), pages 107-148.
    8. E Tapinos & R G Dyson & M Meadows, 2011. "Does the Balanced Scorecard make a difference to the strategy development process?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(5), pages 888-899, May.
    9. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "La gestion sans budget ou l'alignement de la finance sur la stratégie," Post-Print hal-00650532, HAL.
    10. Paul Andon & Jane Baxter & Habib Mahama, 2005. "The Balanced Scorecard: Slogans, Seduction, and State of Play," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(35), pages 29-38, March.
    11. Jennifer Kunz, 2009. "Der Einfluss der Balanced Scorecard auf Lernprozesse in Unternehmen," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 105-128, May.
    12. Francesca Francioli, 2018. "Strategic performance management systems in Italian banks. A research note," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 155-178.
    13. Sandra Cohen & Dimitris Thiraios & Myrto Kandilorou, 2008. "Performance parameters interrelations from a balanced scorecard perspective: An analysis of Greek companies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(5), pages 485-503, May.
    14. Vassili Joannides, 2011. "La gestion sans budget ou l'alignement de la finance sur la stratégie," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00650532, HAL.
    15. Jazayeri, Mostafa & Scapens, Robert W., 2008. "The Business Values Scorecard within BAE Systems: The evolution of a performance measurement system," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 48-70.
    16. Madsen, Dag Øivind & Stenheim, Tonny, 2014. "Balansert målstyring: En kort oversikt over forskningslitteraturen [The Balanced Scorecard: A brief overview of the research literature]," MPRA Paper 65991, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Nizamulmulk Gunes & Erdinc Percemli, "undated". "A study on the balanced scorecard implementation of the SDIF," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 202201, Reviewsep.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1138 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Elmgasbi Alladyn, 2019. "Revision of Performance Measurement Tools and Methods," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 20-35, June.
    20. Dambrin, Claire & Robson, Keith, 2011. "Tracing performance in the pharmaceutical industry: Ambivalence, opacity and the performativity of flawed measures," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 428-455.
    21. VAN CAMP, Jelle & BRAET, Johan, 2013. "Proposing a taxonomy for performance measurement systems' failures," Working Papers 2013004, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Performance Measurement Systems; New Client Acquisition; Sales; Banking Sector; Key Performance Indicator;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2022:i:1:p:65-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.