IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iab/iabmit/v32i1p070-083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Der unterschiedliche Zugang zur betrieblichen Weiterbildung nach Qualifikation und Berufsstatus : eine Analyse auf der Basis des IAB-Betriebspanels 1997 für West- und Ostdeutschland (The different access to company further training according to qualification level and occupational status : an analysis based on the 1997 IAB establishment panel for western and eastern Germany)

Author

Listed:
  • Düll, Herbert
  • Bellmann, Lutz

Abstract

"On the basis of data from the 'further training' survey focus of the 1997 IAB establishment panel, this report explains that the intensity of company further training indeed varies considerably between the different qualification and status groups. In particular qualified non-manual employees are included in institutionalised training measures more often than skilled manual workers and unskilled or semi-skilled workers. In eastern Germany lower-grade clerical workers have a higher participation rate than skilled workers, whereas in western Germany they have a lower participation rate compared with skilled workers. In the context of econometric analyses the influence of the company qualification structure, the intensity of training in the company and the investment in information and communication technology among other things is examined to find out what effect these factors have on the specific participation in further training of the various employee groups. By means of analysis on the labour demand side it is possible to show that there are companyspecific determinants for the type and extent of company training which are firstly independent of the person and thus also of the qualification level of the person taking part in the further training, but which help to explain the selective participation in company training measures. A segmentation in and through further training is, however, from the point of view of the companies certainly rational as long as the general conditions do not change. This includes a more strongly polyvalent deployment of staff and an arrangement of work that is conducive to training as well as a flexible new coordination of initial vocational training and further training based on it." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Suggested Citation

  • Düll, Herbert & Bellmann, Lutz, 1999. "Der unterschiedliche Zugang zur betrieblichen Weiterbildung nach Qualifikation und Berufsstatus : eine Analyse auf der Basis des IAB-Betriebspanels 1997 für West- und Ostdeutschland (The different acc," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 32(1), pages 70-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:iab:iabmit:v:32:i:1:p:070-083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doku.iab.de/mittab/1999/1999_1_MittAB_Duell_Bellmann.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa M. Lynch & Sandra E. Black, 1998. "Beyond the Incidence of Employer-Provided Training," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 52(1), pages 64-81, October.
    2. Dobischat, Rolf & Lipsmeier, Antonius, 1991. "Betriebliche Weiterbildung im Spannungsfeld von Technikanwendung, Qualifikationsentwicklung und Personaleinsatz," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 24(2), pages 344-350.
    3. Dieter Schumacher, 1997. "Immaterielle Investitionen in Deutschland und im internationalen Vergleich," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 66(2), pages 243-257.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pfeifer, Christian, 2013. "Intra-firm Wage Compression and Cost Coverage of Training: Evidence from Linked Employer-Employee Data," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 80030, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Grit Muehler & Michael Beckmann & Bernd Schauenberg, 2007. "The returns to continuous training in Germany: new evidence from propensity score matching estimators," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 209-235, November.
    3. Warnhoff, Kathleen & de Paiva Lareiro, Patricia, 2019. "Skill Development on the Shop Floor - Heading to a Digital Divide?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 145-154.
    4. Lutz Bellmann, 2014. "Kontinuität und Veränderung des IAB-Betriebspanels [The development of the IAB establishment panel]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 47(1), pages 5-26, March.
    5. C. Osiander & M. Dietz, 2016. "Determinanten der Weiterbildungsbereitschaft: Ergebnisse eines faktoriellen Surveys unter Arbeitslosen [What determines the motivation for further training? Results from a factorial survey among jo," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 49(1), pages 59-76, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Düll, Herbert & Bellmann, Lutz, 1999. "Der unterschiedliche Zugang zur betrieblichen Weiterbildung nach Qualifikation und Berufsstatus : eine Analyse auf der Basis des IAB-Betriebspanels 1997 für West- und Ostdeutschland (The different acc," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 32(1), pages 70-83.
    2. Düll, Herbert & Bellmann, Lutz, 1999. "Der unterschiedliche Zugang zur betrieblichen Weiterbildung nach Qualifikation und Berufsstatus : eine Analyse auf der Basis des IAB-Betriebspanels 1997 für West- und Ostdeutschland (The different acc," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 32(1), pages 70-83.
    3. Seung-Gyu Sim & Tim Huegerich, 2018. "Employer Incentives for Providing Informal On-the-job Training in the Presence of On-the-job Search," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 22-40, March.
    4. Zafiris TZANNATOS & Toke S. AIDT, 2006. "Unions and microeconomic performance: A look at what matters for economists (and employers)," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 145(4), pages 257-278, December.
    5. Marco Caliendo & Deborah A. Cobb-Clark & Cosima Obst & Helke Seitz & Arne Uhlendorff, 2022. "Locus of Control and Investment in Training," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(4), pages 1311-1349.
    6. Mark C. Berger & John S. Earle & Klara Sabirianova, 2001. "Worker Training in a Restructuring Economy: Evidence from the Russian Transition," Book chapters authored by Upjohn Institute researchers, in: Soloman W. Polachek (ed.),Worker Wellbeing in a Changing Labor Market, pages 159-189, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    7. Jeffrey B. Arthur, 2011. "Do HR System Characteristics Affect the Frequency of Interpersonal Deviance in Organizations? The Role of Team Autonomy and Internal Labor Market Practices," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 30-56, January.
    8. Etienne Wasmer & Alexandre Janiak, 2014. "Employment protection and capital-labor ratios," Sciences Po Economics Discussion Papers 2014-11, Sciences Po Departement of Economics.
    9. Pfeifer, Christian & Janssen, Simon & Yang, Philip & Backes-Gellner, Uschi, 2010. "Training Participation of an Aging Workforce in an Internal Labor Market," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-447, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    10. Caliendo, Marco & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Obst, Cosima & Uhlendorff, Arne, 2023. "Risk preferences and training investments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 668-686.
    11. Chao Fu, 2011. "Training, Search and Wage Dispersion," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 14(4), pages 650-666, October.
    12. Michel Zaitouni, 2016. "Creating positive outcomes through perceived investment in employee development: Evidence from Kuwait," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(1), pages 10-21, January.
    13. Andries de Grip & Wendy Smits, 2012. "What affects lifelong learning of scientists and engineers?," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 583-597, August.
    14. Annika Campaner & John S. Heywood & Uwe Jirjahn, 2022. "Flexible work organization and employer provided training: Evidence from German linked employer‐employee data," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 3-29, February.
    15. Maria Fotaki & Apostolos Kourtis & Raphael Markellos, 2023. "Human resources turnover as an asset acquisition and divestiture process: Evidence from the U.K. football industry," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2696-2711, July.
    16. Nichola Lowe & Greg Schrock & Ranita Jain & Maureen Conway, 2021. "Genesis at work: Advancing inclusive innovation through manufacturing extension," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 224-241, May.
    17. Asplund, Rita, 2004. "The Provision and Effects of Company Training. A brief review of the literature," Discussion Papers 907, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    18. Sandra E. Black & Lisa Lynch & Anya Krivelyova, 2003. "How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate," NBER Working Papers 9569, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Luc Behagel & Eve Caroli & Emmanuelle Walkowiak, 2007. "Innovation and Skill Upgrading : The Role of External vs Internal Labour Markets," Working Papers 2007-02, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    20. Uwe Jirjahn & Erik Poutsma, 2013. "The Use of Performance Appraisal Systems: Evidence from Dutch Establishment Data," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 801-828, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabmit:v:32:i:1:p:070-083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iabbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.