IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/grm/oikosp/201604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La organización como sistema: el modelo organizacional contemporáneo

Author

Listed:
  • José Luis Camarena Martínez

    (Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora)

Abstract

En la presente reflexión teórica se pretende hacer un análisis crítico de las diferentes concepciones de organización que han surgido para explicar dichas entidades, tomando algunas de las metáforas organizacionales de Morgan (1996). Se complementa lo anterior con los aportes de teorías y autores de la administración y estudio de las organizaciones. Se discute que la visión de la organización como sistema es la más próxima a describir lo que las organizaciones actuales enfrentan: complejidad, cambio constante e incertidumbre. Finalmente se propone un concepto de organización por parte del autor y se discute la base teórica en la que se sustenta.

Suggested Citation

  • José Luis Camarena Martínez, 2016. "La organización como sistema: el modelo organizacional contemporáneo," 'Oikos Polis', Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales (RLCES), Instituto de Investigaciones Economicas y Sociales 'Jose Ortiz Mercado' (IIES-JOM), Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Financieras, Universidad Autonoma Gabriel Rene Moreno, vol. 1(1), pages 135-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:grm:oikosp:201604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://files.uagrm.edu.bo/entidad/161/file/indexed/repec/grm/oikosp/201604.pdf
    File Function: Final version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Didik Wahjudi & Moses L. Singgih & Patdono Suwignjo & Imam Baihaqi, 2016. "The relationship between organisational culture and firm performance: an empirical study on Indonesian manufacturing firms," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Kenneth E. Boulding, 1956. "General Systems Theory--The Skeleton of Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 197-208, April.
    3. Goh, Swee & Richards, Gregory, 1997. "Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 575-583, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    2. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    3. George Kleiner, 2015. "State — Region — Field— Enterprise: Framework of Economics System Stability of Russia. Part 1," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 50-58.
    4. Avner Engel & Shalom Shachar, 2006. "Measuring and optimizing systems' quality costs and project duration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 259-280, September.
    5. Justin R. Hall & Selen Savas-Hall & Eric H. Shaw, 2023. "A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 987-1016, September.
    6. Der-Chiang Li & Ching-Yeh Tsai, 2020. "Antecedents of Employees’ Goal Orientation and the Effects of Goal Orientation on E-Learning Outcomes: The Roles of Intra-Organizational Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Pruksapong, Mutarika, 2008. "Organizational Member Learning and the Influential Factors: The Empirical Study of Thailand," MPRA Paper 10946, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Edwin Ochieng Okul & Raphael O. Nyonje, 2021. "Organizational Leadership Styles and Utilization of Evaluation Results," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 151-151, December.
    9. Masechaba Nthunya & Nien-Tsu Tuan & Corrinne Shaw & Ian Jay, 2017. "A Systemic Exploration of Lesotho’s Basic Education through Interactive Management," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 257-276, June.
    10. Ahmet Ilhan, 2020. "Comparison of Organizational Theory in the Axis of the "Pandemonium" Metaphor in Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Approaches," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 8(4), pages 292-304.
    11. Barile, Sergio & Carrubbo, Luca & Iandolo, Francesca & Caputo, Francesco, 2013. "From 'EGO' to 'ECO' in B2B relationships," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 6(4), pages 228-253.
    12. M C Jackson, 2009. "Fifty years of systems thinking for management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 24-32, May.
    13. Andreas Hieronymi, 2013. "Understanding Systems Science: A Visual and Integrative Approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 580-595, September.
    14. Luoma, Jukka, 2016. "Model-based organizational decision making: A behavioral lens," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 816-826.
    15. David C. Lane, 2022. "Fons et origo: reflections on the 60th anniversary of Industrial Dynamics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(3), pages 292-324, July.
    16. George Kleiner, 2015. "State — Region — Field — Enterprise: Framework of Economics System Stability of Russia. Part 2," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 9-17.
    17. Stephens, William & Hess, Tim, 1999. "Systems approaches to water management research," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 3-13, March.
    18. Jim Spohrer & Alessio Giuiusa & Haluk Demirkan & David Ing, 2013. "Service Science: Reframing Progress with Universities," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 561-569, September.
    19. Jungell-Michelsson, Jessica & Heikkurinen, Pasi, 2022. "Sufficiency: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    20. Ya Li & Zhichang Zhu & Catherine M. Gerard, 2012. "Learning from Conflict Resolution: An Opportunity to Systems Thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 209-220, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:grm:oikosp:201604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roger Alejandro Banegas Rivero (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiagrbo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.