IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jtourh/v3y2021i1p2-30d714255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Place Brand Co-Creation through Storytelling: Benefits, Risks and Preconditions

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana S. Stoica

    (Business and Management Research Institute, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JA, UK)

  • Mihalis Kavaratzis

    (School of Management, Manchester Metropolitan University, All Saints Building, Manchester M15 6BH, UK)

  • Christina Schwabenland

    (Business and Management Research Institute, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JA, UK)

  • Markus Haag

    (Business and Management Research Institute, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LU1 3JA, UK)

Abstract

Co-creation in place branding is used as an umbrella term for the complex brand meaning emerging through stakeholders’ participation in place activities, their contribution, collaborations and interchange of ideas and resources. Co-creation is often an aspiration for places to create and promote their brands collectively. In this context, storytelling—an old technique used in corporate marketing to instigate brand stakeholders’ participation—serves as a method which facilitates place brand co-creation through shared place stories. With the rise of online interactions, the chances of place stakeholders’ participation in brand meaning creation increase, and place stories are effective in allowing diverse place meanings to emerge from various stakeholders. However, when storytelling emerges as a marketing tactic, mostly from a top-down campaign, the stories are not always accepted by all place stakeholders, and they create contrasting brand meanings. The paper aims to investigate the benefits and risks of participation in “Many Voices One Town” (2018), a top-down campaign from Luton, UK, which used storytelling to instigate place brand co-creation. The campaign was created by the Luton Council with an external advertising agency. The campaign attempted to tackle the town’s segregation issues and foster community cohesion through the promotion of seven selected Lutonians’ stories about their diverse and multicultural experiences of living in Luton. The study employs a qualitative methodology to analyse the MVOT case study. Interviews with the council and participants in the campaign and netnographic data from Twitter, Facebook and Instagram were used to gain an insight into residents’ participation in a top-down approach and examine the outcomes of co-creation. Residents’ participation in such a campaign shows numerous benefits but also risks for the place brand. The findings show that participation can sometimes intensify disputes about the town if people’s needs are not properly addressed. The study highlights the importance of open communication between all parties involved in the process, bringing into focus the need for careful coordination of top-down initiatives in line with stakeholders’ needs. It also demonstrates the ‘power of the people’ in the sense that stakeholder engagement with the shared stories led to negative outcomes that were not predicted by the Council.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana S. Stoica & Mihalis Kavaratzis & Christina Schwabenland & Markus Haag, 2021. "Place Brand Co-Creation through Storytelling: Benefits, Risks and Preconditions," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:2-30:d:714255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/3/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/3/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatriz Casais & Patrícia Monteiro, 2019. "Residents’ involvement in city brand co-creation and their perceptions of city brand identity: a case study in Porto," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 229-237, December.
    2. Andrea Insch & Trudie Walters, 2018. "Challenging assumptions about residents’ engagement with place branding," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(3), pages 152-162, August.
    3. Hamby, Anne & Daniloski, Kim & Brinberg, David, 2015. "How consumer reviews persuade through narratives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1242-1250.
    4. Ram, Y. & Björk, P. & Weidenfeld, A., 2016. "Authenticity and place attachment of major visitor attractions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 110-122.
    5. Kasey Clawson Hudak, 2019. "Resident stories and digital storytelling for participatory place branding," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(2), pages 97-108, June.
    6. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    7. Fournier, Susan & Avery, Jill, 2011. "The uninvited brand," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 193-207, May.
    8. Emeline Martin & Sonia Capelli, 2017. "Region brand legitimacy: towards a participatory approach involving residents of a place," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 820-844, July.
    9. Ning (Chris) Chen & Tina Šegota, 2015. "Resident attitudes, place attachment and destination branding: a research framework," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 21(2), pages 145-158, December.
    10. Kaveh Peighambari & Setayesh Sattari & Tim Foster & Åsa Wallström, 2016. "Two tales of one city: Image versus identity," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 314-328, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatriz Casais & Patrícia Monteiro, 2019. "Residents’ involvement in city brand co-creation and their perceptions of city brand identity: a case study in Porto," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 229-237, December.
    2. Ulla Hakala & Arja Lemmetyinen & Lenita Nieminen, 2020. "Rebranding a “rather strange, definitely unique” city via co-creation with its residents," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 316-325, December.
    3. van Laer, Tom & Feiereisen, Stephanie & Visconti, Luca M., 2019. "Storytelling in the digital era: A meta-analysis of relevant moderators of the narrative transportation effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 135-146.
    4. Heather Skinner, 2021. "Place Branding—The Challenges of Getting It Right: Coping with Success and Rebuilding from Crises," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Beatriz Casais & Túlia Poço, 2023. "Emotional branding of a city for inciting resident and visitor place attachment," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 93-102, March.
    6. Bisani, Shalini & Daye, Marcella & Mortimer, Kathleen, 2024. "Legitimacy and inclusivity in place branding," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Rydén, Pernille & Ringberg, Torsten & Wilke, Ricky, 2015. "How Managers' Shared Mental Models of Business–Customer Interactions Create Different Sensemaking of Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 1-16.
    9. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    10. Sindy Liu & Patsy Perry & Gregory Gadzinski, 2019. "The implications of digital marketing on WeChat for luxury fashion brands in China," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 395-409, July.
    11. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    12. Anne Sorensen & Judy Drennan, 2017. "Understanding value-creating practices in social media-based brand communities," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(15-16), pages 986-1007, December.
    13. Anne Seneca Terkelsen & Christian Tolstrup Wester & Gabriel Gulis & Jørgen Jespersen & Pernille Tanggaard Andersen, 2022. "Co-Creation and Co-Production of Health Promoting Activities Addressing Older People—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Daniela Argento & Özgün Imre & Michael Johansson & Kari Rönkkö, 2025. "Facing sustainable city challenges: the quest for attra-chment," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 31-43, March.
    15. Lei Zhou & Jing Zhao & Jinghao Wang, 2024. "Place Attachment or Novel Experience? Enablers of Recreationists’ Environmentally Responsible Behavior in Scenic Spots," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    16. Manuel Alméstar & Sara Romero-Muñoz & Nieves Mestre & Uriel Fogué & Eva Gil & Amanda Masha, 2023. "(Un)Likely Connections between (Un)Likely Actors in the Art/NBS Co-Creation Process: Application of KREBS Cycle of Creativity to the Cyborg Garden Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1203-1226, October.
    18. Stylos, Nikolaos & Bellou, Victoria & Andronikidis, Andreas & Vassiliadis, Chris A., 2017. "Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 15-29.
    19. Eeva-Liisa Oikarinen, 2023. "The Boundaries of a Small Company’s Human Voice: Insights into Dark Humour in Internet Recruitment Advertising," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 223-241, August.
    20. Antioco, Michael & Coussement, Kristof, 2018. "Misreading of consumer dissatisfaction in online product reviews: Writing style as a cause for bias," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 301-310.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:2-30:d:714255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.