IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i4p595-d95605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redistributing Phosphorus in Animal Manure from a Livestock-Intensive Region to an Arable Region: Exploration of Environmental Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Ola Stedje Hanserud

    (Division of Environment and Natural Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, 1430 Ås, Norway
    Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Sem Sælands vei 7, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Kari-Anne Lyng

    (Ostfold Research, Stadion 4, 1671 Kråkerøy, Norway
    Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management (INA), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1432 Ås, Norway)

  • Jerke W. De Vries

    (Van Hall Larenstein, University of Applied Sciences, Agora 1, 8934 CJ Leeuwarden, The Netherlands)

  • Anne Falk Øgaard

    (Division of Environment and Natural Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, 1430 Ås, Norway)

  • Helge Brattebø

    (Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Sem Sælands vei 7, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

Specialized agricultural production between regions has led to large regional differences in soil phosphorus (P) over time. Redistribution of surplus manure P from high livestock density regions to regions with arable farming can improve agricultural P use efficiency. In this paper, the central research question was whether more efficient P use through manure P redistribution comes at a price of increased environmental impacts when compared to a reference system. Secondly, we wanted to explore the influence on impacts of regions with different characteristics. For this purpose, a life cycle assessment was performed and two regions in Norway were used as a case study. Several technology options for redistribution were examined in a set of scenarios, including solid–liquid separation, with and without anaerobic digestion of manure before separation. The most promising scenario in terms of environmental impacts was anaerobic digestion with subsequent decanter centrifuge separation of the digestate. This scenario showed that redistribution can be done with net environmental impacts being similar to or lower than the reference situation, including transport. The findings emphasize the need to use explicit regional characteristics of the donor and recipient regions to study the impacts of geographical redistribution of surplus P in organic fertilizer residues.

Suggested Citation

  • Ola Stedje Hanserud & Kari-Anne Lyng & Jerke W. De Vries & Anne Falk Øgaard & Helge Brattebø, 2017. "Redistributing Phosphorus in Animal Manure from a Livestock-Intensive Region to an Arable Region: Exploration of Environmental Consequences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:595-:d:95605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/4/595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Vries, J.W. & Hoogmoed, W.B. & Groenestein, C.M. & Schröder, J.J. & Sukkel, W. & De Boer, I.J.M. & Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G., 2015. "Integrated manure management to reduce environmental impact: I. Structured design of strategies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 29-37.
    2. De Vries, J.W. & Groenestein, C.M. & Schröder, J.J. & Hoogmoed, W.B. & Sukkel, W. & Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G. & De Boer, I.J.M., 2015. "Integrated manure management to reduce environmental impact: II. Environmental impact assessment of strategies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 88-99.
    3. Willeghems, G. & De Clercq, L. & Michels, E. & Meers, E. & Buysse, J., 2016. "Can spatial reallocation of livestock reduce the impact of GHG emissions?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 11-19.
    4. Mezzullo, William G. & McManus, Marcelle C. & Hammond, Geoff P., 2013. "Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 657-664.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Awiszus & Klaus Meissner & Sebastian Reyer & Joachim Müller, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of a Bio-Refinery Concept Comprising Biogas Production, Lactic Acid Extraction and Plant Nutrient Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Sandile Birthwell Ndwandwe & Ruey-Chee Weng, 2018. "Competitive Analyses of the Pig Industry in Swaziland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Niccolò Pampuro & Christian Preti & Eugenio Cavallo, 2018. "Recycling Pig Slurry Solid Fraction Compost as a Sound Absorber," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Köninger, Julia & Lugato, Emanuele & Panagos, Panos & Kochupillai, Mrinalini & Orgiazzi, Alberto & Briones, Maria J.I., 2021. "Manure management and soil biodiversity: Towards more sustainable food systems in the EU," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Dag Lorick & Robin Harder & Magdalena Svanström, 2021. "A Circular Economy for Phosphorus in Sweden—Is it Possible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunlong Zhang & Tengteng Li & Shuikuan Bei & Junling Zhang & Xiaolin Li, 2018. "Growth and Distribution of Maize Roots in Response to Nitrogen Accumulation in Soil Profiles after Long-Term Fertilization Management on a Calcareous Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Sandile Birthwell Ndwandwe & Ruey-Chee Weng, 2018. "Competitive Analyses of the Pig Industry in Swaziland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Whiting, Andrew & Azapagic, Adisa, 2014. "Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 181-193.
    4. Lauer, Markus & Hansen, Jason K. & Lamers, Patrick & Thrän, Daniela, 2018. "Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 621-636.
    5. Mohammadrezaei, Rashed & Zareei, Samira & Behroozi- Khazaei, Nasser, 2018. "Optimum mixing rate in biogas reactors: Energy balance calculations and computational fluid dynamics simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 54-60.
    6. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    7. Yuan, Xinsong & He, Tao & Cao, Hongliang & Yuan, Qiaoxia, 2017. "Cattle manure pyrolysis process: Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 489-496.
    8. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk, 2020. "GHG Emissions and Efficiency of Energy Generation through Anaerobic Fermentation of Wetland Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Chong, Yih Tng & Teo, Kwong Meng & Tang, Loon Ching, 2016. "A lifecycle-based sustainability indicator framework for waste-to-energy systems and a proposed metric of sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 797-809.
    10. Cortez-Arriola, José & Groot, Jeroen C.J. & Rossing, Walter A.H. & Scholberg, Johannes M.S. & Améndola Massiotti, Ricardo D. & Tittonell, Pablo, 2016. "Alternative options for sustainable intensification of smallholder dairy farms in North-West Michoacán, Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 22-32.
    11. Rillo, E. & Gandiglio, M. & Lanzini, A. & Bobba, S. & Santarelli, M. & Blengini, G., 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of biogas-fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 585-602.
    12. Wei En Tan & Peng Yen Liew & Lian See Tan & Kok Sin Woon & Nor Erniza Mohammad Rozali & Wai Shin Ho & Jamian NorRuwaida, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis for Anaerobic Digestion as Cow Manure Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Wenyao Jin & Xiaochen Xu & Fenglin Yang, 2018. "Application of Rumen Microorganisms for Enhancing Biogas Production of Corn Straw and Livestock Manure in a Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Digestion System: Performance and Microbial Community Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Takata, Miki & Fukushima, Kazuyo & Kawai, Minako & Nagao, Norio & Niwa, Chiaki & Yoshida, Teruaki & Toda, Tatsuki, 2013. "The choice of biological waste treatment method for urban areas in Japan—An environmental perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 557-567.
    15. Shakira R. Hobbs & Tyler M. Harris & William J. Barr & Amy E. Landis, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Bioplastics and Food Waste Disposal Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Congguang Zhang & Jiaming Sun & Jieying Ma & Fuqing Xu & Ling Qiu, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of a Hybrid Solar-Biomass Energy Supplying System: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Freitas, F.F. & Furtado, A.C. & Piñas, J.A.V. & Venturini, O.J. & Barros, R.M. & Lora, E.E.S., 2022. "Holistic Life Cycle Assessment of a biogas-based electricity generation plant in a pig farm considering co-digestion and an additive," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    18. Djatkov, Djordje & Effenberger, Mathias & Martinov, Milan, 2014. "Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 163-175.
    19. Alberto Finzi & Gabriele Mattachini & Daniela Lovarelli & Elisabetta Riva & Giorgio Provolo, 2020. "Technical, Economic, and Environmental Assessment of a Collective Integrated Treatment System for Energy Recovery and Nutrient Removal from Livestock Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Izabela Samson-Bręk & Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska & Krzysztof Biernat, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of the Life Cycle of Electricity Generation from Biogas in Polish Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:595-:d:95605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.