IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i2p300-d90694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Land Fragmentation Evaluation and Dynamic Change of a Typical Black Soil Farming Area in Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Shuhan Liu

    (College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, 2199 Jianshe Street, Changchun 130061, China)

  • Dongyan Wang

    (College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, 2199 Jianshe Street, Changchun 130061, China)

  • Hong Li

    (College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, 2199 Jianshe Street, Changchun 130061, China)

  • Wenbo Li

    (College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, 2199 Jianshe Street, Changchun 130061, China)

  • Qing Wang

    (College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, 2199 Jianshe Street, Changchun 130061, China)

Abstract

Ecological land is a land use category provided with considerable ecological value and a vital indicator reflecting regional eco-environmental quality. However, it has experienced severe fragmentation during the rapid urbanization in China which strongly threatened the regional ecological security, land use pattern and human living environment. Therefore, analysis of spatiotemporal change of ecological land use and ecological landscape pattern is particularly essential. In this paper, a case study was made in Nong’an County, which is a typical black soil farming area located in northeast China facing severe conflicts among cultivated land protection, urban expansion and ecological security. A landscape fragmentation evaluation model was proposed to measure the degree of regional ecological land fragmentation. We also determined the land use change features through the methods of dynamic change information exploration and by performing transfer trajectory analysis during the period from 1996 to 2014. The results showed that the ecological land in Nong’an County has experienced increasing fragmentation during the past 18 years. The statistical results showed that the land transition between ecological land and other land categories was quite frequent, and it especially appeared as a dramatic decline of grassland and severe increase of saline-alkali land. In addition, human interferences especially construction activities and cultivated land occupation were still the dominant factors to the fragmentation of ecological land and the frequent transition among the land use categories. The fragmentation degree showed a downward tendency at the end of the study, which indicated noticeable benefits of land use regulation and land protection policies directed towards land ecological value. This study aims to provide a scientific evaluation model for measuring ecological land fragmentation degree, and figure out the regional land use transition relationships to offer suggestions for decision-making and provide a practical case in a typical region.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuhan Liu & Dongyan Wang & Hong Li & Wenbo Li & Qing Wang, 2017. "Ecological Land Fragmentation Evaluation and Dynamic Change of a Typical Black Soil Farming Area in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:300-:d:90694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/300/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/300/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kongjian Yu & Sisi Wang & Dihua Li, 2011. "The negative approach to urban growth planning of Beijing, China," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 1209-1236, December.
    2. Yuanyuan Yang & Shuwen Zhang & Dongyan Wang & Jiuchun Yang & Xiaoshi Xing, 2014. "Spatiotemporal Changes of Farming-Pastoral Ecotone in Northern China, 1954–2005: A Case Study in Zhenlai County, Jilin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Scherr, Sara J. & Hazell, P. B. R., 1994. "Sustainable agricultural development strategies in fragile lands:," EPTD discussion papers 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yifang Wang & Linlin Cheng & Yang Zheng, 2023. "An Adjusted Landscape Ecological Security of Cultivated Land Evaluation Method Based on the Interaction between Cultivated Land and Surrounding Land Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Wang, Qian & Qiu, Junjie & Yu, Jin, 2019. "Impact of farmland characteristics on grain costs and benefits in the North China Plain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 142-149.
    3. Xujing Yu & Liping Shan & Yuzhe Wu, 2021. "Land Use Optimization in a Resource-Exhausted City Based on Simulation of the F-E-W Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Yong Zhu & Shihu Zhong & Ying Wang & Muhua Liu, 2021. "Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Yi Shang & Dongyan Wang & Shuhan Liu & Hong Li, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Variation and Mechanisms Causing Spatial Differentiation of Ecosystem Services in Ecologically Fragile Regions Based on Value Evaluation: A Case Study of Western Jilin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Shuhan Liu & Dongyan Wang & Guoping Lei & Hong Li & Wenbo Li, 2019. "Elevated Risk of Ecological Land and Underlying Factors Associated with Rapid Urbanization and Overprotected Agriculture in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Ziwei Liu & Mingchang Wang & Xingnan Liu & Fengyan Wang & Xiaoyan Li & Jianguo Wang & Guanglei Hou & Shijun Zhao, 2023. "Ecological Security Assessment and Warning of Cultivated Land Quality in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbier, Bruno & Bergeron, Gilles, 2001. "Natural resource management in the hillsides of Honduras: bioeconomic modeling at the micro-watershed level," Research reports 123, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Scherr, Sara J., 1995. "Economic factors in farmer adoption of agroforestry: Patterns observed in Western Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 787-804, May.
    3. Yuanyuan Yang & Shuwen Zhang & Jiuchun Yang & Xiaoshi Xing & Dongyan Wang, 2015. "Using a Cellular Automata-Markov Model to Reconstruct Spatial Land-Use Patterns in Zhenlai County, Northeast China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Tisdell, Clement A., 1998. "Asia's Livestock Industries: Changes and Environmental Consequences," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 54347, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    5. Jonathan Newby & Rob Cramb & Somphanh Sakanphet, 2014. "Forest Transitions and Rural Livelihoods: Multiple Pathways of Smallholder Teak Expansion in Northern Laos," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Zeller, Manfred & Lapenu, Cécile & Minten, Bart & Ralison, Eliane & Randrianaivo, Désiré & Randrianarisoa, Claude, 2000. "Pathways of rural development in Madagascar," FCND discussion papers 82, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Wang, Sisi & Yang, Ke & Yuan, Donghai & Yu, Kongjian & Su, Yijing, 2019. "Temporal-spatial changes about the landscape pattern of water system and their relationship with food and energy in a mega city in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 401(C), pages 75-84.
    8. Templeton, Scott R. & Scherr, Sara J., 1997. "Population pressure and the microeconomy of land management in hills and mountains of developing countries:," EPTD discussion papers 26, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Pender, John & Nkonya, Ephraim & Jagger, Pamela & Sserunkuuma, Dick & Ssali, Henry, 2004. "Strategies to increase agricultural productivity and reduce land degradation: evidence from Uganda," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 181-195, December.
    10. Pender, John L. & Jagger, Pamela & Nkonya, Ephraim M. & Sserunkuuma, Dick, 2001. "Development pathways and land management in Uganda: causes and implications," EPTD discussion papers 85, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Chamberlin, Jordan & Pender, John & Yu, Bingxin, 2006. "Development domains for Ethiopia: capturing the geographical context of smallholder development options," EPTD discussion papers 159, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Fan, Shenngen & Hazell, Peter & Haque, T., 2000. "Targeting public investments by agro-ecological zone to achieve growth and poverty alleviation goals in rural India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 411-428, August.
    13. Nkonya, Ephraim & Place, Frank & Pender, John & Mwanjololo, Majaliwa & Okhimamhe, Appollonia & Kato, Edward & Crespo, Susana & Ndjeunga, Jupiter & Traore, Sibiry, 2011. "Climate risk management through sustainable land management in Sub-Saharan Africa:," IFPRI discussion papers 1126, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Yuanyuan Yang & Shuwen Zhang, 2018. "Historical Arable Land Change in an Eco-Fragile Area: A Case Study in Zhenlai County, Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Pender, John L., 1998. "Population growth, agricultural intensification, induced innovation and natural resource sustainability: An application of neoclassical growth theory," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 19(1-2), pages 99-112, September.
    16. Nkegbe, Paul K. & Shankar, Bhavani & Ceddia, M. Graziano, 2011. "Smallholder Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Practices in Northern Ghana," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114608, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Martey, Edward & Kuwornu, John K.M., 2021. "Perceptions of Climate Variability and Soil Fertility Management Choices Among Smallholder Farmers in Northern Ghana," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    18. Angela Heymans & Jessica Breadsell & Gregory M. Morrison & Joshua J. Byrne & Christine Eon, 2019. "Ecological Urban Planning and Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Pender, John L. & Scherr, Sara J., 1999. "Organizational development and natural resource management: evidence from central Honduras," EPTD discussion papers 49, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Xin Fu & Xinhao Wang, 2018. "Developing an integrative urban resilience capacity index for plan making," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 367-378, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:300-:d:90694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.