IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i1p95-d87642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Perspective on the Dynamic Balance of Cultivated Land in Wenzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Lin

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Ziran Ye

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Muye Gan

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Amir Reza Shahtahmassebi

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Melanie Weston

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Jinsong Deng

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Shenggao Lu

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Ke Wang

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Cultivated land in China has faced severe challenges in recent years due to rapid urbanization. In 1997, the “cultivated land requisition-compensation balance” policy was implemented by the government to maintain the quantity and quality of cultivated land. Previous studies mainly focused on the quantity changes of cultivated land. In this study, from a quality perspective, we characterized the occupation and compensation of cultivated land in Wenzhou City utilizing remote sensing and geographic information systems during 2005–2010 and 2010–2014. Our results indicated that although the quantity balance of cultivated land has been achieved in Wenzhou, there was a trend of consuming prime cultivated land for urbanization while compensating with less productive land. It was also found that topography, water resources, and accessibility play important roles in cultivated land changes, with urbanization occurring on the eastern coastal plain where high quality lands are prevalent. Less than 60% of the gained lands were under cultivation, with the majority of reclaimed land from forests and coastal areas and located in remote regions. Therefore, we suggest that a “cultivated land protection red line” policy should be implemented to protect the best cultivated lands, while preventing random land reclamation to secure agricultural and environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Lin & Ziran Ye & Muye Gan & Amir Reza Shahtahmassebi & Melanie Weston & Jinsong Deng & Shenggao Lu & Ke Wang, 2017. "Quality Perspective on the Dynamic Balance of Cultivated Land in Wenzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:95-:d:87642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/95/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/95/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonobe, Tetsushi & Hu, Dinghuan & Otsuka, Keijiro, 2004. "From inferior to superior products: an inquiry into the Wenzhou model of industrial development in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 542-563, September.
    2. Jie Song & Dongyan Cai & Jinsong Deng & Ke Wang & Zhangquan Shen, 2015. "Dynamics of Paddy Field Patterns in Response to Urbanization: A Case Study of the Hang-Jia-Hu Plain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    3. S. Alan Walters & John W. Groninger, 2014. "Water distribution systems and on-farm irrigation practices: limitations and consequences for Afghanistan's agricultural productivity," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 348-359, May.
    4. Linlin Xiao & Xiaohuan Yang & Hongyan Cai & Dingxiang Zhang, 2015. "Cultivated Land Changes and Agricultural Potential Productivity in Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Lichtenberg, Erik & Ding, Chengri, 2009. "Local officials as land developers: Urban spatial expansion in China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 57-64, July.
    6. Su, Shiliang & Hu, Yi’na & Luo, Fanghan & Mai, Gengchen & Wang, Yaping, 2014. "Farmland fragmentation due to anthropogenic activity in rapidly developing region," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 87-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Lin & Hongzhen Jia & Yi Pan & Lefeng Qiu & Muye Gan & Shenggao Lu & Jinsong Deng & Zhoulu Yu & Ke Wang, 2017. "Exploring the Patterns and Mechanisms of Reclaimed Arable Land Utilization under the Requisition-Compensation Balance Policy in Wenzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Shan He & Hailun Zhu & Amir Reza Shahtahmassebi & Lefeng Qiu & Chaofan Wu & Zhangquan Shen & Ke Wang, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Variability of Soil Nitrogen in Relation to Environmental Factors in a Low Hilly Region of Southeastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Weifan Zhang & Yan Song, 2019. "Is There a Kuznets Curve Effect for China’s Land-Driven Development Mode?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Kuang, Bing & Lu, Xinhai & Zhou, Min & Chen, Danling, 2020. "Provincial cultivated land use efficiency in China: Empirical analysis based on the SBM-DEA model with carbon emissions considered," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Yinshuai Li & Chunyan Chang & Yongchang Zhao & Zhuoran Wang & Tao Li & Jianwei Li & Jiacong Dou & Ruibin Fan & Qiyao Wang & Jingwen Yang & Shuwei Zhang & Gengxing Zhao, 2021. "Evaluation System Transformation of Multi-Scale Cultivated Land Quality and Analysis of Its Spatio-Temporal Variability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Chen Li & Xiangmu Jin & Junjun Zhi & Yao Luo & Mengni Li & Wangbing Liu, 2022. "Evaluating Whether Farmland Consolidation Is a Feasible Way to Achieve a Balance of Potential Crop Production in Southeastern Coastal China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Meng Wang & Xiaofang Sun & Zemeng Fan & Tianxiang Yue, 2019. "Investigation of Future Land Use Change and Implications for Cropland Quality: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Jingwei Xiang & Xiaoqing Song & Jiangfeng Li, 2019. "Cropland Use Transitions and Their Driving Factors in Poverty-Stricken Counties of Western Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Xiaofu Lin & Hui Fu, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Forces of Cultivated Land Based on the PLUS Model: A Case Study of Haikou City, 1980–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Yuchen Guo & Wei Song, 2019. "Spatial Distribution and Simulation of Cropland Abandonment in Wushan County, Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Wenbo Li & Dongyan Wang & Shuhan Liu & Yuanli Zhu & Zhuoran Yan, 2020. "Reclamation of Cultivated Land Reserves in Northeast China: Indigenous Ecological Insecurity Underlying National Food Security," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hengzhou Xu & Chuanrong Zhang & Weidong Li & Wenjing Zhang & Hongchun Yin, 2018. "Economic growth and carbon emission in China:a spatial econometric Kuznets curve?," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 11-28.
    2. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Zhonghua Huang & Xuejun Du, 2017. "Strategic interaction in local governments’ industrial land supply: Evidence from China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1328-1346, May.
    4. Ge, Dazhuan & Long, Hualou & Zhang, Yingnan & Ma, Li & Li, Tingting, 2018. "Farmland transition and its influences on grain production in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-105.
    5. Winda Ika Susanti & Sri Noor Cholidah & Fahmuddin Agus, 2024. "Agroecological Nutrient Management Strategy for Attaining Sustainable Rice Self-Sufficiency in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Long, Cheryl & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2012. "Patterns of China's industrialization: Concentration, specialization, and clustering," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 593-612.
    7. Xuanyi Nie, 2023. "The ‘medical city’ and China’s entrepreneurial state: Spatial production under rising consumerism in healthcare," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(6), pages 1102-1122, May.
    8. Zhang, Qianwen & Gao, Wujun & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min & Cai, Zhongliang, 2017. "Biophysical and socioeconomic determinants of tea expansion: Apportioning their relative importance for sustainable land use policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 438-447.
    9. Tetsushi Sonobe & Keijiro Otsuka, 2012. "The Role of Training in Fostering Cluster-Based Micro and Small Enterprises Development," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-099, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Jiani Ma & Chao Zhang & Wenju Yun & Yahui Lv & Wanling Chen & Dehai Zhu, 2020. "The Temporal Analysis of Regional Cultivated Land Productivity with GPP Based on 2000–2018 MODIS Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Chong Zhao & Yong Zhou & Xigui Li & Pengnan Xiao & Jinhui Jiang, 2018. "Assessment of Cultivated Land Productivity and Its Spatial Differentiation in Dongting Lake Region: A Case Study of Yuanjiang City, Hunan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xinhua Tong & Yanfei Wei & Xiaoqiang Shen, 2019. "Inside or Outside? The Impact Factors of Zoning–Land Use Mismatch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Wang, Yuan & Hui, Eddie Chi-man, 2017. "Are local governments maximizing land revenue? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 196-215.
    14. Jipeng Zhang & Jianyong Fan & Jiawei Mo, 2017. "Government Intervention, Land Market, And Urban Development: Evidence From Chinese Cities," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 115-136, January.
    15. Li, Shi & Vendryes, Thomas, 2018. "Real estate activity, democracy and land rights in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 54-79.
    16. Li Gan & Qing He & Ruichao Si & Daichun Yi, 2019. "Relocating or Redefined: A New Perspective on Urbanization in China," NBER Working Papers 26585, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Khondoker, Abdul Mottaleb & Sonobe, Tetsushi, 2010. "Human Capital and Industrial Development: Evidence from the Machinery Industry in Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 44007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. W. H. Furtan & J. Sauer, 2008. "Determinants of Food Industry Performance: Survey Data and Regressions for Denmark," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 555-573, September.
    19. Hashino, Tomoko & Otsuka, Keijiro, 2013. "Cluster-based industrial development in contemporary developing countries and modern Japanese economic history," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 19-32.
    20. Zhou, Min & Tan, Shukui & Tao, Yinghui & Lu, Yongzhong & Zhang, Zuo & Zhang, Lu & Yan, Danping, 2017. "Neighborhood socioeconomics, food environment and land use determinants of public health: Isolating the relative importance for essential policy insights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 246-253.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:95-:d:87642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.