IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i11p2030-d117826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade-Offs between Economic and Environmental Optimization of the Forest Biomass Generation Supply Chain in Inner Mongolia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Min Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Guangyu Wang

    (Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Yi Gao

    (Department of Wood Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Zhenqi Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Feng Mi

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghua East Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The utilization of forest residue to produce forest biomass energy can mitigate CO 2 emissions and generate additional revenue for related eco-enterprises and farmers. In China, however, the benefit of this utilization is still in question because of high costs and CO 2 emissions in the entire supply chain. In this paper, a multi-objective linear programming model (MLP) is employed to analyze the trade-offs between the economic and environmental benefits of all nodes within the forest biomass power generation supply chain. The MLP model is tested in the Mao Wu Su biomass Thermoelectric Company. The optimization results show that (1) the total cost and CO 2 emissions are decreased by US$98.4 thousand and 60.6 thousand kg, respectively; 3750 thousand kg of waste-wood products is reduced and 3750 thousand kg of sandy shrub stubble residue is increased; (2) 64% of chipped sandy shrub residue is transported directly from the forestland to the power plant, 36% of non-chipped sandy shrub residue is transported from the forestland to the power plant via the chipping plant; (3) transportation and chipping play a significant role in the supply chain; and (4) the results of a sensitivity analysis show that the farmer’s average transportation distance should be 84.13 km and unit chipping cost should be $0.01022 thousand for the optimization supply cost and CO 2 emissions. Finally, we suggest the following: (1) develop long-term cooperation with farmers; (2) buy chain-saws for regularly used farmers; (3) build several chipping plants in areas that are rich in sandy shrub.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Zhang & Guangyu Wang & Yi Gao & Zhenqi Wang & Feng Mi, 2017. "Trade-Offs between Economic and Environmental Optimization of the Forest Biomass Generation Supply Chain in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:2030-:d:117826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/2030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/2030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Srirangan, Kajan & Akawi, Lamees & Moo-Young, Murray & Chou, C. Perry, 2012. "Towards sustainable production of clean energy carriers from biomass resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 172-186.
    2. Shabani, Nazanin & Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2013. "Value chain optimization of forest biomass for bioenergy production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 299-311.
    3. Shabani, Nazanin & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2013. "A mixed integer non-linear programming model for tactical value chain optimization of a wood biomass power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 353-361.
    4. Lim, Chun Hsion & Lam, Hon Loong, 2016. "Biomass supply chain optimisation via novel Biomass Element Life Cycle Analysis (BELCA)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 733-745.
    5. Gunnarsson, Helene & Ronnqvist, Mikael & Lundgren, Jan T., 2004. "Supply chain modelling of forest fuel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 103-123, October.
    6. Ferdinand Vinuya & Ferdinand DiFurio & Erica Sandoval, 2010. "A decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions in the United States," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(10), pages 925-931.
    7. Lee, Kihoon & Oh, Wankeun, 2006. "Analysis of CO2 emissions in APEC countries: A time-series and a cross-sectional decomposition using the log mean Divisia method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 2779-2787, November.
    8. Rentizelas, Athanasios A. & Tolis, Athanasios J. & Tatsiopoulos, Ilias P., 2009. "Logistics issues of biomass: The storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 887-894, May.
    9. Bürger, Veit & Klinski, Stefan & Lehr, Ulrike & Leprich, Uwe & Nast, Michael & Ragwitz, Mario, 2008. "Policies to support renewable energies in the heat market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 3140-3149, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Ke & Wang, Jiayu & Wei, Yi-Ming & Zhang, Chi, 2018. "A novel dataset of emission abatement sector extended input-output table for environmental policy analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1259-1267.
    2. Chih-Chun Kung & Bruce A. McCarl, 2018. "Sustainable Energy Development under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-4, September.
    3. Nepal, Sandhya & Tran, Liem T., 2019. "Identifying trade-offs between socio-economic and environmental factors for bioenergy crop production: A case study from northern Kentucky," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 272-283.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Biomass logistics: A review of important features, optimization modeling and the new trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 587-599.
    2. Ba, Birome Holo & Prins, Christian & Prodhon, Caroline, 2016. "Models for optimization and performance evaluation of biomass supply chains: An Operations Research perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P2), pages 977-989.
    3. Gao, Evelyn & Sowlati, Taraneh & Akhtari, Shaghaygh, 2019. "Profit allocation in collaborative bioenergy and biofuel supply chains," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Deboni, Tamires Liza & Simioni, Flávio José & Brand, Martha Andreia & Costa, Valdeci José, 2019. "Models for estimating the price of forest biomass used as an energy source: A Brazilian case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 382-391.
    5. Malladi, Krishna Teja & Quirion-Blais, Olivier & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2018. "Development of a decision support tool for optimizing the short-term logistics of forest-based biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 662-677.
    6. Lo, Shirleen Lee Yuen & How, Bing Shen & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Rhamdhani, Muhammad Akbar & Sunarso, Jaka, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis for biomass supply chain: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Tatiana M. Pinho & João Paulo Coelho & Germano Veiga & A. Paulo Moreira & José Boaventura-Cunha, 2017. "A Multilayer Model Predictive Control Methodology Applied to a Biomass Supply Chain Operational Level," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, July.
    8. Shabani, Nazanin & Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2013. "Value chain optimization of forest biomass for bioenergy production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 299-311.
    9. Svanberg, Martin & Ellis, Joanne & Lundgren, Joakim & Landälv, Ingvar, 2018. "Renewable methanol as a fuel for the shipping industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1217-1228.
    10. Cambero, Claudia & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2014. "Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives – A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-73.
    11. Razm, Sobhan & Brahimi, Nadjib & Hammami, Ramzi & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2023. "A production planning model for biorefineries with biomass perishability and biofuel transformation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    12. Shabani, Nazanin & Sowlati, Taraneh & Ouhimmou, Mustapha & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2014. "Tactical supply chain planning for a forest biomass power plant under supply uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 346-355.
    13. Krystel K. Castillo-Villar & Hertwin Minor-Popocatl & Erin Webb, 2016. "Quantifying the Impact of Feedstock Quality on the Design of Bioenergy Supply Chain Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Xin Yang & Chunbo Ma & Anlu Zhang, 2016. "Decomposition of Net CO 2 Emission in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area of Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Zailan, Roziah & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah Wan & Mohammadi-ivatloo, Behnam & Jamaluddin, Khairulnadzmi, 2021. "Malaysia scenario of biomass supply chain-cogeneration system and optimization modeling development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Hao Lv & Hao Ding & Dequn Zhou & Peng Zhou, 2014. "A Site Selection Model for a Straw-Based Power Generation Plant with CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Hugo Guzmán-Bello & Iosvani López-Díaz & Miguel Aybar-Mejía & Jose Atilio de Frias, 2022. "A Review of Trends in the Energy Use of Biomass: The Case of the Dominican Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Kühmaier, Martin & Erber, Gernot & Kanzian, Christian & Holzleitner, Franz & Stampfer, Karl, 2016. "Comparison of costs of different terminal layouts for fuel wood storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 544-551.
    19. Nunes, L.J.R. & Causer, T.P. & Ciolkosz, D., 2020. "Biomass for energy: A review on supply chain management models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    20. Van Dael, Miet & Van Passel, Steven & Pelkmans, Luc & Guisson, Ruben & Reumermann, Patrick & Luzardo, Nathalie Marquez & Witters, Nele & Broeze, Jan, 2013. "A techno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 611-622.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:2030-:d:117826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.