IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i11p1995-d117074.html

Gen2 RFID-Based System Framework for Resource Circulation in Closed-Loop Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Young-woo Kim

    (Department of Industrial Engineering/ASRI (Automation System Research Institute), Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Tai-Woo Chang

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering/Intelligence & Manufacturing Research Center, Kyonggi University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16227, Korea)

  • Jinwoo Park

    (Department of Industrial Engineering/ASRI (Automation System Research Institute), Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

Product recycling has become a mandatory activity under extended producer responsibility. Therefore, it is important to operate a closed-loop supply chain that integrates sourcing, production, delivery, and recycling to achieve not only environmental sustainability, but also economic benefits. However, this goal is affected by chronic problems caused by uncertainties relating to the return timing, quantity, and quality of returned items. Many studies proved that information visibility could solve these problems. In this context, a system framework for closed-loop supply chain management is proposed that gathers real-time information within a supply chain and product lifecycle by using the Internet-of-Things, including radio frequency identification (RFID). Specifically, the most recent Gen2 RFID protocol, which provides new features to create new positive effects, is considered. Additionally, an information system is designed, including RFID tag encoding, which supports the operation of the proposed system. Finally, the lifecycle benefits are examined, such as counterfeit prevention, real-time monitoring and maintenance in the middle-of-life phase, and reverse process streamlining. The ultimate aim is to design a system that facilitates the profitable and environmentally friendly operation of the closed-loop supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-woo Kim & Tai-Woo Chang & Jinwoo Park, 2017. "Gen2 RFID-Based System Framework for Resource Circulation in Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1995-:d:117074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/1995/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/11/1995/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Denno & Thomas Thurman, 2005. "Requirements on information technology for product lifecycle management," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 109-122.
    2. Reid Lifset & Atalay Atasu & Naoko Tojo, 2013. "Extended Producer Responsibility," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(2), pages 162-166, April.
    3. Vedran Kordic (ed.), 2008. "Supply Chain," Books, IntechOpen, number 26, June.
    4. Krikke, H.R. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & Van Wassenhove, L.N., 2001. "Design of Closed Loop Supply Chains," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-45-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Flavio Tonelli & Steve Evans & Paolo Taticchi, 2013. "Industrial sustainability: challenges, perspectives, actions," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 143-163.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng Yang & Kaiyi Wang & Yanyun Han & Zhong Qiao, 2018. "A Cloud-Based Digital Farm Management System for Vegetable Production Process Management and Quality Traceability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Islam, Md. Monirul & Mahmudul Alam, Md. & Sohag, Kazi, 2025. "Recycling through technology diffusion for circular economy in Europe: A decomposed assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Simonetto, Marco & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Battini, Daria & Govindan, Kannan, 2022. "Closed loop supply chains 4.0: From risks to benefits through advanced technologies. A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    4. Changhyun Kim & KwangSup Shin, 2019. "Developing Fair Investment Plans to Enhance Supply Chain Visibility Using Cooperative Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Bartosz Pawłowicz & Marek Kołcz & Piotr Jankowski-Mihułowicz, 2022. "The Idea of RFIDtex Transponders Utilization in Household Appliances on the Example of a Washing Machine Demonstrator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chavatip Chindavijak & Kongkiti Phusavat & Pekka Kess & Suparerk Sooksamarn, 2016. "Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    2. Morvarid Rahmani & Luyi Gui & Atalay Atasu, 2021. "The Implications of Recycling Technology Choice on Extended Producer Responsibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 522-542, February.
    3. Kyung Sung Jung & Milind Dawande & H. Neil Geismar & V. Daniel R. Guide & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2016. "Supply planning models for a remanufacturer under just-in-time manufacturing environment with reverse logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(2), pages 533-581, May.
    4. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    5. Jakob T. Pruess, 2023. "Unraveling the complexity of extended producer responsibility policy mix design, implementation, and transfer dynamics in the European Union," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1500-1520, December.
    6. Xiaojiao Qiao & Xiukun Zhao & Jinhui Zou, 2021. "Remanufacturing Marketing Decisions in the Presence of Retailing Platforms in the Carbon Neutrality Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Jiří Vyskočil & Petr Douda & Petr Novák & Bernhard Wally, 2023. "A Digital Twin-Based Distributed Manufacturing Execution System for Industry 4.0 with AI-Powered On-The-Fly Replanning Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-27, April.
    8. Erik G. Hansen & Ferdinand Revellio, 2020. "Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1250-1273, December.
    9. Işıl & Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu, 2020. "Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 364-382, March.
    10. Albachiara Boffelli & Stefano Dotti & Paolo Gaiardelli & Giorgia Carissimi & Barbara Resta, 2019. "Corporate Environmental Management for the Textile Industry: Toward an Empirical Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-25, November.
    11. Juan Guo & Long Guo & Abdul Waheed & Yang Jianhua, 2025. "Impact of Industry 5.0 Technologies and Circular Economy on Sustainable Performance: An Evaluation From Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8190-8202, December.
    12. Jesús García-Arca & A. Trinidad González-Portela Garrido & J. Carlos Prado-Prado, 2017. "“Sustainable Packaging Logistics”. The link between Sustainability and Competitiveness in Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Kergosien, Y. & Gendreau, M. & Billaut, J.-C., 2017. "A Benders decomposition-based heuristic for a production and outbound distribution scheduling problem with strict delivery constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 287-298.
    14. Paul J. A. Withers & Donnacha G. Doody & Roger Sylvester-Bradley, 2018. "Achieving Sustainable Phosphorus Use in Food Systems through Circularisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Garth Hickle, 2017. "Extending the Boundaries: An Assessment of the Integration of Extended Producer Responsibility Within Corporate Social Responsibility," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 112-124, January.
    16. Demartini, Melissa & Bertani, Filippo & Tonelli, Flavio & Raberto, Marco & Cincotti, Silvano, 2021. "An investigation into modelling approaches for industrial symbiosis: a literature review," MPRA Paper 107448, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Gan, Shu-San & Pujawan, I. Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2017. "Pricing decision for new and remanufactured product in a closed-loop supply chain with separate sales-channel," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 120-132.
    18. X. Guo & P. Kaminsky & P. Tomecek & M. Yuen, 2011. "Optimal spot market inventory strategies in the presence of cost and price risk," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 73(1), pages 109-137, February.
    19. Sazvar, Z. & Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J. & Govindan, K. & Bahli, B., 2016. "A novel mathematical model for a multi-period, multi-product optimal ordering problem considering expiry dates in a FEFO system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 232-261.
    20. Işıl Alev & Ximin (Natalie) Huang & Atalay Atasu & L. Beril Toktay, 2019. "A Case Discussion on Market‐Based Extended Producer Responsibility: The Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 208-221, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:11:p:1995-:d:117074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.