IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i2p184-d64188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Have Changes to Unused Land in China Improved or Exacerbated Its Environmental Quality in the Past Three Decades?

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Yi

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Zengxiang Zhang

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Xiaoli Zhao

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Bin Liu

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Xiao Wang

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Qingke Wen

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Lijun Zuo

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Fang Liu

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Jingyong Xu

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Shunguang Hu

    (Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Inappropriate land use has caused a series of environmental disasters such as floods and sand storms, and some of them involved unused land changes with highly localized distributions in arid and semi-arid regions with fragile ecosystems. As the third-rank category of first-level land use/cover in China, unused land (UL) is now playing an increasingly important role in protection of the natural environment and sustainable utilization of land resources. In this article, we assessed the effects on regional eco-environments employing a quantitative EL (ecological effect index) model, which can be used to evaluate and represent the contribution of UL changes to the eco-environmental quality. Results show that UL changes generally contributed to the deterioration of eco-environmental quality during the study period. Some major contributors to improving eco-environmental quality were transformation of sandy land and saline-alkali lands to grasslands, expansion of water bodies in UL areas, and reclamation of farmland in UL areas (except for marsh lands). In contrast, the main contributors to worsening eco-environmental quality were grassland degradation to UL (except marshes), reclamation of marsh areas, and shrinkage of water bodies to leave desert or saline-alkali land. Some suggestions are provided about UL management, utilization, and protection issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Yi & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiaoli Zhao & Bin Liu & Xiao Wang & Qingke Wen & Lijun Zuo & Fang Liu & Jingyong Xu & Shunguang Hu, 2016. "Have Changes to Unused Land in China Improved or Exacerbated Its Environmental Quality in the Past Three Decades?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:184-:d:64188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/2/184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/2/184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Asafu‐Adjaye, 2003. "Biodiversity Loss and Economic Growth: A Cross‐Country Analysis," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 21(2), pages 173-185, April.
    2. Dansong Wang & Ahmad Hadavi & Raymond Krizek, 2006. "Chinese construction firms in reform," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 509-519.
    3. Mitsch, William J. & Gosselink, James G., 2000. "The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 25-33, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bowen Zhang & Ying Wang & Jiangfeng Li & Liang Zheng, 2022. "Degradation or Restoration? The Temporal-Spatial Evolution of Ecosystem Services and Its Determinants in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Ze Zhou & Bin Quan & Zhiwei Deng, 2023. "Effects of Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in Xiangjiang River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Ruiqiu Pang & Ning Hu & Jingrui Zhou & Dongqi Sun & Hongying Ye, 2022. "Study on Eco-Environmental Effects of Land-Use Transitions and Their Influencing Factors in the Central and Southern Liaoning Urban Agglomeration: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Xue Bai & Zhongwu Zhang & Zhe Li & Jinyuan Zhang, 2023. "Spatial Heterogeneity and Formation Mechanism of Eco-Environmental Quality in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Zhiyin Wang & Jiansheng Cao & Chunyu Zhu & Hui Yang, 2020. "The Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in the Upstream of Xiong’an New Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Jiaming Wang & Ximeng Yang & Guangxing Ji, 2025. "Multi-Scenario Simulations of “Production–Living–Ecological” Functional Patterns and Ecological Effects in the Upper Reaches of Huaihe River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laxmi D. Bhatta & Sunita Chaudhary & Anju Pandit & Himlal Baral & Partha J. Das & Nigel E. Stork, 2016. "Ecosystem Service Changes and Livelihood Impacts in the Maguri-Motapung Wetlands of Assam, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Nisse Goldberg & Russell L. Watkins, 2021. "Spatial comparisons in wetland loss, mitigation, and flood hazards among watersheds in the lower St. Johns River basin, northeastern Florida, USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1743-1757, November.
    3. Hermine Vedogbeton & Robert J. Johnston, 2020. "Correction to: Commodity Consistent Meta-Analysis of Wetland Values: An Illustration for Coastal Marsh Habitat," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(4), pages 869-878, December.
    4. Scemama, Pierre & Levrel, Harold, 2019. "Influence of the Organization of Actors in the Ecological Outcomes of Investment in Restoration of Biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 71-79.
    5. Ariane Amin & Johanna Choumert, 2015. "Development and biodiversity conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A spatial analysis," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(1), pages 729-744.
    6. Peters, Jan & Baets, Bernard De & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Degroeve, Sven & Becker, Piet De & Huybrechts, Willy, 2007. "Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 304-318.
    7. Bi Goli Jean Jacques Iritie, 2015. "Economic Growth and Biodiversity: An Overview Conservation Policies in Africa," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 196-196, February.
    8. Posthumus, H. & Rouquette, J.R. & Morris, J. & Gowing, D.J.G. & Hess, T.M., 2010. "A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1510-1523, May.
    9. Natacha LASKOWSKI, 2013. "Optimal allocation of wetlands: Study on conflict between agriculture and fishery," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2013-07, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    10. Francisca Guedes de Oliveira & Alexandra Leitão, 2012. "Cultural and Political Determinants of Air Quality," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 01, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
    11. Carus, Jana & Heuner, Maike & Paul, Maike & Schröder, Boris, 2017. "Which factors and processes drive the spatio-temporal dynamics of brackish marshes?—Insights from development and parameterisation of a mechanistic vegetation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 122-136.
    12. Fulford, Richard & Yoskowitz, David & Russell, Marc & Dantin, Darrin & Rogers, John, 2016. "Habitat and recreational fishing opportunity in Tampa Bay: Linking ecological and ecosystem services to human beneficiaries," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 64-74.
    13. Tianjie Li & Yan Huang & Chaoguang Gu & Fangbo Qiu, 2022. "Application of Geodesign Techniques for Ecological Engineered Landscaping of Urban River Wetlands: A Case Study of Yuhangtang River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    14. D.C & Nwankwoala & H. O & Okujagu, 2021. "A Review Of Wetlands And Coastal Resources Of The Niger Delta: Potentials, Challenges And Prospects," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 37-46, March.
    15. Humberto Peraza-Villarreal & Alejandro Casas & Roberto Lindig-Cisneros & Alma Orozco-Segovia, 2019. "The Marceño Agroecosystem: Traditional Maize Production and Wetland Management in Tabasco, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Sonter, Laura J. & Johnson, Justin A. & Nicholson, Charles C. & Richardson, Leif L. & Watson, Keri B. & Ricketts, Taylor H., 2017. "Multi-site interactions: Understanding the offsite impacts of land use change on the use and supply of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 158-164.
    17. Ariane Manuela Amin, 2012. "What Drives Biodiversity Conservation Effort in the Developing World? An analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa," CERDI Working papers halshs-00722081, HAL.
    18. Jamil Amanollahi & Shahram Kaboodvandpour & Hiva Majidi, 2017. "Evaluating the accuracy of ANN and LR models to estimate the water quality in Zarivar International Wetland, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1511-1527, February.
    19. Kadykalo, Andrew N. & Findlay, C. Scott, 2016. "The flow regulation services of wetlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 91-103.
    20. Andrew J Tanentzap, 2017. "The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-7, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:184-:d:64188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.