IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v109y2021i2d10.1007_s11069-021-04896-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial comparisons in wetland loss, mitigation, and flood hazards among watersheds in the lower St. Johns River basin, northeastern Florida, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Nisse Goldberg

    (Jacksonville University)

  • Russell L. Watkins

    (Threshold Spatial Sciences)

Abstract

Wetlands provide invaluable ecosystem services to moderate the effects of flooding. In the United States, Sect. 404 of the Clean Waters Act requires that mitigation of impacted wetlands from issued Environmental Resource Permits (ERPs) occur in the same watershed. This study investigated spatial patterns of impacted wetlands and compulsory mitigation (e.g., preservation and/or purchase of mitigation bank credits) in three watersheds of the lower St. Johns River basin, Florida, from ERPs submitted in 2006–2019. Each watershed was stratified by the Federal Emergency Management Administration’s (FEMA) designated 100-year floodplain, 500-year floodplain, and outside the floodplain. Flood hazards (e.g., projected 2030 Sea Level Rise, seasonal nuisance high tides, and storm surge) were compared among the three floodplain categories with ERP data, age and value of residential structures, FEMA field assessment following Hurricane Irma in 2017, and a composite flood hazard score. Results indicated that wetland loss occurred primarily in the 100- and 500-year floodplains, and wetlands were at greatest risk from projected 2030 SLR and nuisance high tides. These ERPs planned to preserve upland and wetlands by purchasing credits from banks located in areas with low risk of flooding. Older houses were typically in areas with greater flood hazard exposure, with higher home values. This study demonstrated that a watershed evaluation of flood exposure should be considered for future development, regardless of floodplain category. Given the significant social and economic costs from flood damage, community planners should prioritize protection of wetlands and open spaces in areas most vulnerable to flood hazards.

Suggested Citation

  • Nisse Goldberg & Russell L. Watkins, 2021. "Spatial comparisons in wetland loss, mitigation, and flood hazards among watersheds in the lower St. Johns River basin, northeastern Florida, USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1743-1757, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:109:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04896-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04896-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-04896-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-04896-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolyn Kousky, 2018. "Financing Flood Losses: A Discussion of the National Flood Insurance Program," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 21(1), pages 11-32, March.
    2. Samuel Brody & Jung Kang & Sarah Bernhardt, 2010. "Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: the role of organizational capacity," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 52(1), pages 167-184, January.
    3. Mitsch, William J. & Gosselink, James G., 2000. "The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 25-33, October.
    4. Wesley E Highfield & Sarah A Norman & Samuel D Brody, 2013. "Examining the 100‐Year Floodplain as a Metric of Risk, Loss, and Household Adjustment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 186-191, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chloe H. Lucas & Kate I. Booth, 2020. "Privatizing climate adaptation: How insurance weakens solidaristic and collective disaster recovery," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(6), November.
    2. Laxmi D. Bhatta & Sunita Chaudhary & Anju Pandit & Himlal Baral & Partha J. Das & Nigel E. Stork, 2016. "Ecosystem Service Changes and Livelihood Impacts in the Maguri-Motapung Wetlands of Assam, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Hermine Vedogbeton & Robert J. Johnston, 2020. "Commodity Consistent Meta-Analysis of Wetland Values: An Illustration for Coastal Marsh Habitat," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 835-865, April.
    4. Scemama, Pierre & Levrel, Harold, 2019. "Influence of the Organization of Actors in the Ecological Outcomes of Investment in Restoration of Biodiversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 71-79.
    5. Carlynn Fagnant & Avantika Gori & Antonia Sebastian & Philip B. Bedient & Katherine B. Ensor, 2020. "Characterizing spatiotemporal trends in extreme precipitation in Southeast Texas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1597-1621, November.
    6. Peter John Robinson & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Fujin Zhou, 2021. "An experimental study of charity hazard: The effect of risky and ambiguous government compensation on flood insurance demand," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 275-318, December.
    7. Peters, Jan & Baets, Bernard De & Verhoest, Niko E.C. & Samson, Roeland & Degroeve, Sven & Becker, Piet De & Huybrechts, Willy, 2007. "Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 304-318.
    8. Posthumus, H. & Rouquette, J.R. & Morris, J. & Gowing, D.J.G. & Hess, T.M., 2010. "A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1510-1523, May.
    9. Natacha LASKOWSKI, 2013. "Optimal allocation of wetlands: Study on conflict between agriculture and fishery," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2013-07, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    10. Georges Dionne & Denise Desjardins, 2022. "A re‐examination of the US insurance market's capacity to pay catastrophe losses," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 25(4), pages 515-549, December.
    11. Carus, Jana & Heuner, Maike & Paul, Maike & Schröder, Boris, 2017. "Which factors and processes drive the spatio-temporal dynamics of brackish marshes?—Insights from development and parameterisation of a mechanistic vegetation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 122-136.
    12. Fulford, Richard & Yoskowitz, David & Russell, Marc & Dantin, Darrin & Rogers, John, 2016. "Habitat and recreational fishing opportunity in Tampa Bay: Linking ecological and ecosystem services to human beneficiaries," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 64-74.
    13. Tianjie Li & Yan Huang & Chaoguang Gu & Fangbo Qiu, 2022. "Application of Geodesign Techniques for Ecological Engineered Landscaping of Urban River Wetlands: A Case Study of Yuhangtang River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Justin Contat & Carrie Hopkins & Luis Mejia & Matthew Suandi, 2024. "When climate meets real estate: A survey of the literature," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 52(3), pages 618-659, May.
    15. D.C & Nwankwoala & H. O & Okujagu, 2021. "A Review Of Wetlands And Coastal Resources Of The Niger Delta: Potentials, Challenges And Prospects," Environment & Ecosystem Science (EES), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 37-46, March.
    16. Humberto Peraza-Villarreal & Alejandro Casas & Roberto Lindig-Cisneros & Alma Orozco-Segovia, 2019. "The Marceño Agroecosystem: Traditional Maize Production and Wetland Management in Tabasco, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Sonter, Laura J. & Johnson, Justin A. & Nicholson, Charles C. & Richardson, Leif L. & Watson, Keri B. & Ricketts, Taylor H., 2017. "Multi-site interactions: Understanding the offsite impacts of land use change on the use and supply of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 158-164.
    18. Jamil Amanollahi & Shahram Kaboodvandpour & Hiva Majidi, 2017. "Evaluating the accuracy of ANN and LR models to estimate the water quality in Zarivar International Wetland, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(3), pages 1511-1527, February.
    19. Kadykalo, Andrew N. & Findlay, C. Scott, 2016. "The flow regulation services of wetlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 91-103.
    20. Andrew J Tanentzap, 2017. "The costs of saving nature: Does it make “cents”?," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-7, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:109:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04896-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.