IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i1p747-766d44572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextualism and Sustainability: A Community Renewal in Old City of Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Shangyi Zhou

    (School of Geography, Beijing Normal University,19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Shaobo Zhang

    (School of Geography, Beijing Normal University,19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

The conception of contextualism in community planning emphasizes the integrity of architecture and its surroundings. It also implies the sustainability of landscape meaning within a community. In as much as planning theories have not mentioned how extensive the background of a community should be considered by a community planner, this paper will seek to answer this question. It considers Nanluoguxiang (NLGX), a community in the old city of Beijing, as the study area. Based on government documents, interviews of residents and also landscape observations in NLGX, this paper identifies the contextual practices in three renovation stages from the perspective of place uniqueness. The planners considered the background of NLGX at three different scales in its three renovation stages. In the last stage, they considered the entire country within the context of planning. NLGX has a unique image in Beijing, even within China. The image of it is the main market at the north end of the Grand Canal. The Grand Canal shows the spatial organization power of the ancient empire because it was the key food supply route for the capital. This is not only the cultural heritage of local residents of NLGX, but is also identified by other citizens in China. We conclude that an historical community can be preserved better by national funds if it has found a unique meaning of its landscape within a broader background.

Suggested Citation

  • Shangyi Zhou & Shaobo Zhang, 2015. "Contextualism and Sustainability: A Community Renewal in Old City of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:747-766:d:44572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/747/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/747/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Heintzelman & Jason Altieri, 2013. "Historic Preservation: Preserving Value?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 543-563, April.
    2. Martin Heintzelman & Jason Altieri, 2013. "Erratum to: Historic Preservation: Preserving Value?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 564-564, April.
    3. John Stanley & Janet Stanley & David Hensher, 2012. "Mobility, Social Capital and Sense of Community: What Value?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(16), pages 3595-3609, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chenhan Jiang & Yiqi Xiao & Hongyi Cao, 2020. "Co-Creating for Locality and Sustainability: Design-Driven Community Regeneration Strategy in Shanghai’s Old Residential Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Jun Jiang & Tongguang Zang & Jianglong Xing & Konomi Ikebe, 2023. "Spatial Distribution of Urban Heritage and Landscape Approach to Urban Contextual Continuity: The Case of Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Xin Li & Shangyi Zhou, 2018. "The Trialectics of Spatiality: The Labeling of a Historical Area in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Li, Dezhi & Du, Bingzhen & Zhu, Jin, 2021. "Evaluating old community renewal based on emergy analysis: A case study of Nanjing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 449(C).
    5. Jiayin Zhang & Mingliang Lin & Min Wang & Yinbin Lin, 2023. "Scale transformation of place brands: a visual study of Xinhepu, Guangzhou," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Yuqi Zhang & Sungik Kang & Ja-Hoon Koo, 2019. "What Is the Critical Factor and Relationship of Urban Regeneration in a Historic District?: A Case of the Nanluoguxiang Area in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Been, Vicki & Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Gedal, Michael & Glaeser, Edward & McCabe, Brian J., 2016. "Preserving history or restricting development? The heterogeneous effects of historic districts on local housing markets in New York City," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-30.
    2. Mario A. Fernandez & Shane L. Martin, 2020. "What’s so special about character?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3236-3251, December.
    3. Zhou, Yang, 2021. "The political economy of historic districts: The private, the public, and the collective," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Stephanie Ryberg-Webster & Kelly L Kinahan, 2017. "Historic preservation in declining city neighbourhoods: Analysing rehabilitation tax credit investments in six US cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(7), pages 1673-1691, May.
    5. Caixia Liu & Xiaolong Liu, 2022. "Adaptive Reuse of Religious Heritage and Its Impact on House Prices," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 71-92, January.
    6. Portillo, Javier E. & Wagner, Gary A., 2021. "Do cultural districts spur urban revitalization: Evidence from Louisiana," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 651-673.
    7. Tetsuharu Oba & Douglas Simpson Noonan, 2020. "The Price of Preserving Neighborhoods: The Unequal Impacts of Historic District Designation," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(4), pages 343-355, November.
    8. Qiu, Feng & Tong, Qingmeng, 2021. "A spatial difference-in-differences approach to evaluate the impact of light rail transit on property values," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Jamie Bologna Pavlik & Yang Zhou, 2023. "Are historic districts a backdoor for segregation? Yes and no," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(3), pages 415-434, July.
    10. Diego Zapata Cordoba & John Stanley & Janet Robin Stanley, 2014. "Reducing Social Exclusion in Highly Disadvantaged Districts in Medellín, Colombia, through the Provision of a Cable-Car," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(4), pages 1-13.
    11. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa & Koomson, Isaac & Munyanyi, Musharavati Ephraim, 2023. "Transport poverty and obesity: The mediating roles of social capital and physical activity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 155-166.
    13. Elena Maria MINEA, 2014. "Territorial Attractiveness – A Long-Term Issue For Public Policies," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 58, pages 101-110, September.
    14. Stanley, John K. & Hensher, David A. & Stanley, Janet R. & Vella-Brodrick, Dianne, 2021. "Valuing changes in wellbeing and its relevance for transport policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 16-27.
    15. Utsunomiya, Kiyohito, 2016. "Social capital and local public transportation in Japan," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 434-440.
    16. Anciaes, Paulo & Jones, Peter & Mindell, Jennifer S. & Scholes, Shaun, 2022. "The cost of the wider impacts of road traffic on local communities: 1.6% of Great Britain's GDP," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 266-287.
    17. David Cao & John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2017. "Indicators of Socio-Spatial Transport Disadvantage for Inter-Island Transport Planning in Rural Philippine Communities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 116-131.
    18. Lucy Rossiter & Kai Gu, 2023. "The Impact of Special Character Areas on Property Values and Homeowners’ Experiences: Cases from Auckland, New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Yong Tu & Pei Li & Leiju Qiu, 2017. "Housing search and housing choice in urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(8), pages 1851-1866, June.
    20. Vicki Been & Ingrid Gould Ellen & Michael Gedal & Edward Glaeser & Brian J. McCabe, 2014. "Preserving History or Hindering Growth? The Heterogeneous Effects of Historic Districts on Local Housing Markets in New York City," NBER Working Papers 20446, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:747-766:d:44572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.